Skip to main content
Open Book Publishers

8. Why Do We Do What We Do? Analysing the Evolutionary Function of Reproductive Behaviour

Chapter of: Human Evolutionary Demography(pp. 197–210)

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.1
  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Metadata
Title8. Why Do We Do What We Do?
SubtitleAnalysing the Evolutionary Function of Reproductive Behaviour
ContributorRuth Mace(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0251.08
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0251/chapters/10.11647/obp.0251.08
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
CopyrightRuth Mace
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2024-06-14
Long abstractHere I describe the reasoning behind dividing explanations for the evolution of behaviour into four different levels of explanation, two relating to proximate explanations relating to mechanism and development, and two ultimate explanations relating to evolutionary history and function. I outline the basic methods we can use to attempt to test functional hypotheses about the evolution of behaviour. I note that in natural populations, we often find ourselves studying proximate mechanisms even if our central interest is evolutionary function. I conclude that a distinction between proximate and ultimate explanations for behaviour can be a useful heuristic tool in many situations, even if in some real world studies of human behaviour, this distinction is sometimes blurred.
Page rangepp. 197–210
Print length14 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Contributors

Ruth Mace

(author)
Professor of Evolutionary Anthropology at University College London
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6137-7739
https://www.ucl.ac.uk/anthropology/people/academic-and-teaching-staff/ruth-mace

Ruth Mace studies human behavioural ecology and cultural evolution. Her PhD was in animal behavioural ecology at the Dept of Zoology at Oxford University and she then moved to London to study human behaviour. She is now Professor of Evolutionary Anthropology in the Dept of Anthropology at UCL, where she has supervised over 25 PhD students. She has worked on human reproductive decisions, the evolution of menopause, cooperation, matrilineal and other kinship systems and cultural phylogenetics. She is founding Editor-in-Chief of the journal Evolutionary Human Sciences.

References
  1. Aberle, D. F. 1961. ‘Matrilineal descent in cross-cultural perspective’, Matrilineal Kinship, ed. by D. M. Schneider and K. Gough (Berkeley: University of California Press), pp. 655–727.
  2. Anderies, J. M. 1996. ‘An adaptive model for predicting !kung reproductive performance: A stochastic dynamic programming approach’, Ethology and Sociobiology, 17.4: pp. 221–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(96)00037-4
  3. Blurton-Jones, N. 1986. ‘Bushman birth spacing – a test for optimal interbirth intervals’, Ethology and Sociobiology, 7.2: pp. 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(86)90002-6
  4. Chagnon, N. and W. Irons. 1979. Evolutionary Biology and Human Social Behaviour (North Scituate, Massachusettts: Duxbury Press).
  5. Engelhardt, S. C., P. Bergeron, A. Gagnon, L. Dillon and F. Pelletier. 2019. ‘Using Geographic Distance as a Potential Proxy for Help in the Assessment of the Grandmother Hypothesis’, Current Biology, 29.4: pp. 651–56.e653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.027
  6. Gibson, M. A. and R. Mace. 2006. ‘An energy-saving development initiative increases birth rate and childhood malnutrition in rural Ethiopia’, Plos Medicine, 3.4, pp. 476–84. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030087
  7. Grosjean, P. and R. C. Brooks. 2017. “Persistent effect of sex ratios on relationship quality and life satisfaction’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372.1729: pp. 20160315. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0315
  8. Gustafsson, L. 1994. ‘Infectious disease, reproductive effort and the cost of reproduction in birds’, Philosphical Transactions of the Royal Society London Series B, 346.1317: pp. 323–31. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1994.0149
  9. Harcourt, A. H., P. H. Harvey, S. G. Larson and R. V. Short. 1981. ‘Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates’, Nature, 293.5827: pp. 55–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/293055a0
  10. Hawkes, K., J. F. O’Connell, N. G. Blurton-Jones, H. Alvarez and E. L. Charnov. 1998. ‘Grandmothering, menopause and the evolution of human life histories’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95.3: pp. 1336–39. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.95.3.1336
  11. Hesketh, T. and Z. W. Xing. 2006. ‘Abnormal sex ratios in human populations: Causes and consequences’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103.36: pp. 13271–13275. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0602203103
  12. Holden, C. J. and R. Mace. 2003. ‘Spread of cattle led to the loss of matrilineal descent in Africa: a coevolutionary analysis’, Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 270.1532: pp. 2425–33. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2535
  13. Houston, A. I., C. W. Clark, J. McNamara and M. Mangel. 1988. ‘Dynamic models in behavioural and evolutionary ecology’, Nature, 332.6159: pp. 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/332029a0
  14. Huelsenbeck, J. P., F. Ronquist, R. Nielsen and J. P. Bollback. 2001. ‘Bayesian Inference of Phylogeny and Its Impact on Evolutionary Biology’, Science, 294.5550: pp. 2310–14. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1065889
  15. Ji, T., X.-D. Zheng, Q.-Q. He, J.-J. Wu, R. Mace and Y. Tao. 2016. ‘Kinship as a frequency dependent strategy’, Royal Society Open Science, 3.2: pp. 150632. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150632
  16. Johnstone, R. A. and M. A. Cant. 2010. ‘The evolution of menopause in cetaceans and humans: the role of demography’, Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 277.1701: pp. 3765–71. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0988
  17. Kim, P. S., J. E. Coxworth and K. Hawkes. 2012. ‘Increased longevity evolves from grandmothering’, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279.1749: pp. 4880–84. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.1751
  18. Krebs, J. R. and N. B. Davies. 1993. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology, Third Edition (Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific Publications).
  19. Lack, D. 1954. ‘The evolution of reproductive rates’, in Evolution as a Process, ed. by J. S. Huxley, A. C. Hardy and E. B. Ford (London: Allen and Unwin), pp. 143–56.
  20. Lahdenpera, M., V. Lummaa, S. Helle, M. Tremblay and A. F. Russell, 2004. ‘Fitness benefits of prolonged post-reproductive lifespan in women’, Nature, 428.6979: pp. 178–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02367
  21. Laland, K. N. and G. R. Brown. 2002. Sense and Nonsense. Evolutionary Perspectives on Human Behaviour (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
  22. Laland, K. N., K. Sterelny, J. Odling-Smee, W. Hoppitt and T. Uller. 2011. ‘Cause and Effect in Biology Revisited: Is Mayr’s Proximate-Ultimate Dichotomy Still Useful?, Science, 334.6062: pp. 1512–16. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210879
  23. Liu, J., C. Duan and V. Lummaa. 2017. ‘Parent-offspring conflict over family size in current China’, American Journal of Human Biology, 29.3. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.22946
  24. Lummaa, V., T. Vuorisalo, R. G. Barr and L. Lehtonen. 1998. ‘Why Cry? Adaptive Significance of Intensive Crying in Human Infants’, Evolution and Human Behavior, 19.3: pp. 193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1090-5138(98)00014-2
  25. Mace, R. 1998. ‘The co-evolution of human fertility and wealth inheritance strategies’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 353.1367: pp. 389–97. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1998.0217
  26. Mace, R. 2005. ‘On the use of phylogenetic comparative methods to test co-evolutionary hypotheses across cultures’, The Evolution of Cultural Diversity: A Phylogenetic Approach, ed. by R. Mace, C. J. Holden and S. J. Shennan (London and Walnut Creek, USA: Left Coast Press), pp. 199–205.
  27. Mace, R. 2014. ‘Human behavioural ecology and its evil twin’, Behavioural ecology, 25.3: pp. 443–49. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru069
  28. Mace, R., C. Holden and S. J. Shennan, (eds.). 2005. The Evolution of Cultural Diversity: A Phylogenetic Approach (University College London and Walnut Creek, USA: Left Coast Press).
  29. Mace, R. and F. M. Jordan. 2005. ‘The evolution of human sex ratio at birth: a biocultural analysis’, The Evolution of Cultural Diversity: A Phylogenetic Approach, ed. by R. Mace, C. J. Holden and S. J. Shennan (London and Walnut Creek, USA: Left Coast Press), pp. 207–16.
  30. Mace, R. and M. Pagel. 1994. ‘The comparative method in anthropology’, Current Anthropology, 35.5: pp. 549–64. https://doi.org/10.1086/204317
  31. Mayr, E. 1961. ‘Cause and Effect in Biology’, Science, 134.3489: pp. 1501–06. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.134.3489.1501
  32. Murdock, G. P. 1967. Ethnographic Atlas (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).
  33. Nichols, H. J., L. Zecherle and K. Arbuckle, 2016. ‘Patterns of philopatry and longevity contribute to the evolution of post-reproductive lifespan in mammals’, Biology Letters, 12.2: 20150992. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2015.0992
  34. Pagel, M. 1994. ‘Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies – a general-method for the comparative-analysis of discrete characters’, Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 255.1342: pp. 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1994.0006
  35. Pagel, M. 1999. ‘Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution’, Nature, 401.6756: pp. 877–84. https://doi.org/10.1038/44766
  36. Pagel, M. 2009. ‘Human language as a culturally transmitted replicator’, Nature Reviews Genetics, 10.6: pp. 405–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2560
  37. Pagel, M. and A. Meade. 2006. ‘Bayesian analysis of correlated evolution of discrete characters by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo’, American Naturalist, 167.6: pp. 808–25. https://doi.org/10.1086/503444
  38. Pagel, M., A. Meade and D. Barker. 2004. ‘Bayesian estimation of ancestral character states on phylogenies’, Systematic Biology, 53.5: pp. 673–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150490522232
  39. Pennington, R. 1992. ‘Did food increase fertility? Evaluation of Kung and Herero history’, Human Biology, 64.4: pp. 497–521. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41464305
  40. Roff, D. A. 1992. The Evolution of Life Histories (New York: Chapman and Hall).
  41. Schacht, R., K. L. Kramer, T. Székely and P. M. Kappeler. 2017. ‘Adult sex ratios and reproductive strategies: a critical re-examination of sex differences in human and animal societies’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372.1729: pp. 20160309. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0309
  42. Sear, R., F. Steele, I. A. McGregor and R. Mace. 2002. ‘The effects of kin on child mortality in rural Gambia’, Demography, 39.1: pp. 43–63. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2002.0010
  43. Snopkowski, K., C. Moya and R. Sear. 2014. ‘A test of the intergenerational conflict model in Indonesia shows no evidence of earlier menopause in female-dispersing groups’, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281.1788: pp. 20140580. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.0580
  44. Strassmann, B. I. 2011. ‘Cooperation and competition in a cliff-dwelling people’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108.Supplement 2: pp. 10894–10901. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100306108
  45. Thomas, M. G., D. P. Shanley, A. I. Houston, J. M. McNamara, R. Mace and T. B. L. Kirkwood. 2015. ‘A dynamic framework for the study of optimal birth intervals reveals the importance of sibling competition and mortality risks’, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 28.4: pp. 885–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12613
  46. Thouzeau, V. and M. Raymond. 2017. ‘Emergence and maintenance of menopause in humans: A game theory model’, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 430.Supplement C: pp. 229–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2017.07.019
  47. Tinbergen, N. 1963. ‘On aims and methods of ethology’, Z. Tierpsychol, 20.4: pp. 410–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1963.tb01161.x
  48. Úbeda, F., H. Ohtsuki and A. Gardner. 2014. ‘Ecology drives intragenomic conflict over menopause’, Ecology Letters, 17.2: pp. 165–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12208
  49. Uggla, C. and R. Mace. 2017. ‘Adult sex ratio and social status predict mating and parenting strategies in Northern Ireland’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 372.1729: pp. 20160318. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0318
  50. West, S. A., C. El Mouden and A. Gardner. 2011. ‘Sixteen common misconceptions about the evolution of cooperation in humans’, Evolution and Human Behavior, 32.4: pp. 231–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.08.001
  51. Wilson, E. O. 1980. Sociobiology. The Abridged Version (Harvard, Massachussetts: Belknap & Harvard University Press).
  52. Yang, Y., M. Arnot and R. Mace. 2019. ‘Current ecology, not ancestral dispersal patterns, influences menopause symptom severity’, Ecology and Evolution (in press).