Skip to main content
Login
  1. Home
  2. Having Too Much
  3. 9. Sufficiency, Limits, and Multi-Threshold Views
Open Book Publishers

9. Sufficiency, Limits, and Multi-Threshold Views

  • Colin Hickey(author)
Chapter of: Having Too Much: Philosophical Essays on Limitarianism(pp. 219–246)
  • Export Metadata
  • Metadata
  • Locations
  • Contributors
  • References

Export Metadata

Metadata
Title9. Sufficiency, Limits, and Multi-Threshold Views
ContributorColin Hickey(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0338.09
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0338/chapters/10.11647/obp.0338.09
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
CopyrightColin Hickey
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2023-07-06
Long abstract

In this chapter, I intervene on a set of debates in the distributive justice literature to assess the relation between sufficientarianism and limitarianism. In particular, I investigate whether sufficientarians should (or even must) also endorse a limitarian thesis, and similarly whether limitarians should (or even must) also endorse a sufficiency thesis. I argue affirmatively that sufficientarians have very good reasons to also adopt a limitarian thesis, as do limitarians to adopt a sufficientarian thesis. While I entertain some speculative arguments about a necessary conceptual connection between the views, the results are more tentative. So, while it is likely, in principle, possible to affirm one view without the other, doing so is hard to motivate and not advisable. I end the chapter suggesting some reasons why it should actually be less surprising than we might think that our most plausible theories of distributive justice would turn out to be “multi-threshold” views of a certain structure, containing (at least) one sufficientarian threshold and one limitarian threshold.

Page rangepp. 219–246
Print length28 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Locations
Landing PageFull text URLPlatform
PDFhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0338/chapters/10.11647/obp.0338.09Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0338.09.pdfFull text URLPublisher Website
HTMLhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0338/chapters/10.11647/obp.0338.09Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0338/ch9.xhtmlFull text URLPublisher Website
Contributors

Colin Hickey

(author)
Assistant Professor in the Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics at University of Amsterdam
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2275-8130

Colin Hickey is an Assistant Professor at the University of Amsterdam, in the Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics. Previously, he was a postdoctoral research associate at Princeton University in the University Center for Human Values and the High Meadows Environmental Institute, and before that he was a postdoctoral researcher at Utrecht University with the Fair Limits Project. He received his PhD in philosophy from Georgetown University. His work focuses on moral and political philosophy, especially issues of climate justice and responsibility.

References
  1. Axelsen, David and Lasse Nielsen. 2015. Sufficiency as Freedom from Duress, Journal of Political Philosophy, 23 (4), 406–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12048
  2. Barry, Brian. 1989. Theories of Justice. Hemel-Hempstead: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
  3. Benbaji, Yitzak. 2005. The Doctrine of Sufficiency: A Defence, Utilitas, 17(3), 310–332. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820805001676
  4. Benbaji, Yitzak. 2006. Sufficiency or Priority? European Journal of Philosophy, 14(3), 327–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2006.00228.x
  5. Carey, Brian. 2020. Provisional Sufficientarianism: Distributive Feasibility in Non‐ideal Theory, The Journal of Value Inquiry, 54, 589–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-020-09732-7
  6. Casal, Paula. 2007. Why Sufficiency Is Not Enough, Ethics, 117, 296–326. https://doi.org/10.1086/510692
  7. Christiano, Thomas. 2012. Money in Politics. In: David Estlund (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 241–257.
  8. Crisp, Roger. 2003a. Equality, Priority, and Compassion, Ethics, 113(4), 745–763. https://doi.org/10.1086/373954
  9. Crisp, Roger. 2003b. Egalitarianism and Compassion, Ethics, 114(1), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1086/377088
  10. Frankfurt, Harry. 1987. Equality as a Moral Ideal, Ethics, 98, 21–43. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2381290
  11. Gough, Ian. 2017. Recomposing Consumption: Defining Necessities for Sustainable and Equitable Well-being, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 375 (Issue 2095): 20160379. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0379
  12. Hickey, Colin. 2021. Climate Change, Distributive Justice, and “Pre-Institutional” Limits on Resource Appropriation, European Journal of Philosophy, 29(1), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12569
  13. Hope, Simon. 2010. The Circumstances of Justice, Hume Studies, 36(2), 125–148. http://doi.org/10.1353/hms.2010.0015
  14. Hume, David. 2000. A Treatise of Human Nature (Ed. David Fate Norton and Mary J. Norton). New York: Oxford University Press.
  15. Hume, David. 1998. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals (Ed. Tom L. Beauchamp). New York: Oxford University Press.
  16. Huseby, Robert. 2010. Sufficiency: Restated and Defended, The Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (2), 178–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00338.x
  17. Huseby, Robert. 2020. Sufficiency and the Threshold Question, The Journal of Ethics, 24, 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-020-09321-7
  18. Huseby, Robert. 2022. The Limits of Limitarianism, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 30(2), 230–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12274
  19. Millward-Hopkins, Joel. 2022. Inequality can double the energy required to secure universal decent living, Nature Communications, 13, 5028. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32729-8
  20. Nielsen, Lasse. 2019. Sufficiency and Satiable Values, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 36(5), 800–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12364
  21. Nussbaum, Martha. 2006. Frontiers of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
  22. O’Neill, Daniel, et al. 2018. A good life for all within planetary boundaries. Nature Sustainability, 1, 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4
  23. Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  24. Raworth, Kate. 2017. Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist. London: Random House.
  25. Robeyns, Ingrid. 2017. Having Too Much. In: J. Knight & M. Schwartzberg (Eds). NOMOS LVI: Wealth. Yearbook of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy. New York: New York University Press, pp. 1–44.
  26. Robeyns, Ingrid. 2019. What, If Anything, Is Wrong with Extreme Wealth? Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 20 (3), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2019.1633734
  27. Robeyns, Ingrid. 2022. Why Limitarianism? The Journal of Political Philosophy, 30(2), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12275
  28. Shields, Liam. 2012. The Prospects for Sufficientarianism, Utilitas, 14, 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820811000392
  29. Shields, Liam. 2016. Just Enough: Sufficiency as a Demand of Justice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  30. Tebble, A. J. 2020. On the Circumstances of Justice, European Journal of Political Theory, 19(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885116664191
  31. Temkin, Larry. 2003. Egalitarianism Defended, Ethics, 113(4), 764–782. https://doi.org/10.1086/373955
  32. Timmer, Dick. 2021a. Limitarianism: Pattern, Principle, or Presumption? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 38(5), 760–773. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12502
  33. Timmer, Dick. 2021b. Thresholds in Distributive Justice, Utilitas, 33(4), 422–441. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820821000194
  34. Timmer, Dick. 2022. Justice, Thresholds, and the Three Claims of Sufficientarianism, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 30(3), 298–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12258
  35. Vanderschraaf, Peter. 2006. The Circumstances of Justice. Politics, Philosophy & Economics 5(3), 321–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X06068303
  36. Volacu, Alexandru and Adelin Dumitru. 2019. Assessing Non-intrinsic Limitarianism, Philosophia, 47, 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-018-9966-9
  37. Wiedmann, Thomas, et al. 2020. Scientists’ warning on affluence, Nature Communications, 11, 3107. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y
  38. Zwarthoed, Danielle. 2018. Autonomy-Based Reasons for Limitarianism, Ethical Theory Moral Practice, 21, 1181–1204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-018-9958-7

Export Metadata

UK registered social enterprise and Community Interest Company (CIC).

Company registration 14549556

Metadata

  • By book
  • By publisher
  • GraphQL API
  • Export API

Resources

  • Downloads
  • Videos
  • Merch
  • Presentations
  • Service status

Contact

  • Email
  • Bluesky
  • Mastodon
  • Github

Copyright © 2026 Thoth Open Metadata. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.