punctum books
Postcard Telepathy
- Nicholas Royle (author)
Chapter of: Going Postcard: The Letter(s) of Jacques Derrida(pp. 65–67)
Export Metadata
- ONIX 3.1Cannot generate record: No publications supplied
- ONIX 3.0
- ThothCannot generate record: No publications supplied
- Project MUSECannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
- OAPENCannot generate record: Missing PDF URL
- JSTORCannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
- Google BooksCannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
- OverDriveCannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
- Thoth
- ONIX 2.1
- EBSCO HostCannot generate record: No PDF or EPUB URL
- ProQuest EbraryCannot generate record: No PDF or EPUB URL
- EBSCO Host
- CSV
- JSON
- OCLC KBART
- BibTeX
- CrossRef DOI depositCannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
- MARC 21 RecordCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
- MARC 21 MarkupCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
- MARC 21 XMLCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Title | Postcard Telepathy |
---|---|
Contributor | Nicholas Royle (author) |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.21983/P3.0171.1.05 |
Landing page | https://punctumbooks.com/titles/going-postcard-the-letters-of-jacques-derrida/ |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
Copyright | Royle, Nicholas |
Publisher | punctum books |
Published on | 2017-05-15 |
Long abstract | How construe commentary on a postcard that is specifically figured as “a pictorial performative which never ends” (PC, 98/108) — especially if it must reckon, at the same time, with that fragmentary phantom supplement published later as “Telepathy”1? I have been trying to read a bit of one of your post-cards, one of several dated 6 June 1977 (I note in passing that my own record of that day reveals that I too was in Oxford, and in the evening went to watch Yellow Submarine— Oxford can be a lonely place on a Monday night):What is going on under Socrates’ leg, do you recognize this object? It plunges under the waves made by the veils around the plump buttocks, you see the rounded double, improb-able enough, it plunges straight down, rigid, like the nose of a stingray, to electrocute the old man and analyze him under narcosis. You know that they were both very interested in this paralyzing animal. Would it make him write by paralyz-ing him? All of this, that I do not know or do not yet want to see, also comes back from the bottom of the waters of my memory, a bit as if I had drawn or engraved the scene, from the day that, in an Algiers lycée no doubt, I first heard of those two. Do people (I am not speaking of “philosophers” or of those who read Plato) realize to what extent this old couple has invaded our most private domesticity, mixing themselves up in everything, taking their part of everything, and mak-ing us attend for centuries their colossal and indefatigable anaparalyses? (PC, 18/23) |
Page range | pp. 65–67 |
Print length | 3 pages |
Language | English (Original) |
Contributors