| Title | Running with Derrida |
|---|---|
| Contributor | James E. Burt(author) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.21983/P3.0171.1.13 |
| Landing page | https://punctumbooks.com/titles/going-postcard-the-letters-of-jacques-derrida/ |
| License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
| Copyright | Burt, James E. |
| Publisher | punctum books |
| Published on | 2017-05-15 |
| Long abstract | The exact difference between running and jogging is not estab-lished in the Oxford English Dictionary, which merely defines jogging as “to run at a gentle pace (esp. as part of a ‘keep-fit’ schedule).” When someone is referred to as a jogger the re-sponse will often be to correct this, to assert that they are, in fact, a runner, the activities treated as distinct despite one being a form of the other. The narrator of the “Envois” is aware of this distinction, saying that they “cannot bear that I run,” preferring him to jog. Running is privileged over jogging.It’s not speed that separates running from jogging. There is something awkward about the motion of a jogger, expressed through its homonymic associations, jogging someone’s pen for example. Jogging is more restrained than running, often part of a schedule, something programmed and therefore predictable. Certain people prefer the narrator to jog because it “never goes very far” — a runner’s reach is greater than a jogger’s. Indeed, jogging is “only a training,” not an activity in itself, preparation to provide some wind, “the strength to live what I risk with you.” |
| Page range | pp. 179–183 |
| Print length | 5 pages |
| Language | English (Original) |