Skip to main content
Login
  1. Home
  2. Historiographies of Game Studies
  3. Anthropology, Play Studies, and the Entanglements of Game Studies: Two Roads Diverged in an Ivory Wood
punctum books

Anthropology, Play Studies, and the Entanglements of Game Studies: Two Roads Diverged in an Ivory Wood

  • Laya Liebeseller(author)
  • Josh Rivers(author)
Chapter of: Historiographies of Game Studies: What It Has Been, What It Could Be(pp. 411–430)
  • Export Metadata
  • Metadata
  • Contributors

Export Metadata

Metadata
TitleAnthropology, Play Studies, and the Entanglements of Game Studies
SubtitleTwo Roads Diverged in an Ivory Wood
ContributorLaya Liebeseller(author)
Josh Rivers(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.53288/0441.1.19
Landing pagehttps://punctumbooks.com/titles/historiographies-of-game-studies-what-it-has-been-what-it-could-be/
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
CopyrightLaya Liebeseller and Josh Rivers
Publisherpunctum books
Published on2025-07-25
Long abstract Game Studies is a robust interdisciplinary field that has succeeded in incorporating myriad methodological and theoretical positionalities, yet there remain voices from the discipline’s past and its margins that go unheard or forgotten. In this article, we trace the history of The Association of the Study of Play (TASP), originally founded in 1973 as The Association of the Anthropological Study of Play (TAASP), and its entanglement with, as well as disentanglement from, the broader discipline of Anthropology in order to highlight the social mess à la John Law that is involved in the institutionalization of a set of research interests and thereby ‘legitimization’ of a field. In doing so, we speak to the inherent pitfalls involved in demarcating a discipline’s boundaries while challenging Game Studies scholars to consider the entanglements of their field. This tracing of the entanglements between TASP, Anthropology, Game Studies, and Play Studies aims to serve as a reminder that no discipline is immune from losing sight of its past and no field ought to forego searching the annals of its own history, both for what has been lost or purposefully ignored.
Page rangepp. 411–430
Print length20 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Contributors

Laya Liebeseller

(author)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1637-9759

Laya Liebeseller (they/any) is a play scholar, game designer, and anthropologist. Their current design work focuses on imagining queer futures and horror in its relation to current social dynamics. In their academic work they study play during pandemic times. Since 2013, they have worked with live-action roleplay communities, tabletop roleplaying communities, and most recently alternate reality game communities. Their ongoing dissertation research details analog game communities, their abrupt transition online in 2020, and the continuing ramifications.

Josh Rivers

(author)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0729-5043

Josh Rivers (he/him) holds a PhD in Anthropology from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, at the time of publication, is a Research Manager at Xbox. His research interests reside at the nexus of queer theory, institutions, and video games. Past projects include his dissertation work, an ethnographic exploration of how the Icelandic cultural context of CCP Games impacted the manner in which the corporation architects ethics into the fabric of their massively-multiplayer online game, EVE Online, as well as an ethnographic analysis of queer community-making in Final Fantasy XIV.

Export Metadata

UK registered social enterprise and Community Interest Company (CIC).

Company registration 14549556

Metadata

  • By book
  • By publisher
  • GraphQL API
  • Export API

Resources

  • Downloads
  • Videos
  • Merch
  • Presentations
  • Service status

Contact

  • Email
  • Bluesky
  • Mastodon
  • Github

Copyright © 2026 Thoth Open Metadata. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.