Skip to main content
Login
  1. Home
  2. Historiographies of Game Studies
  3. Video or Digital? Exploring the Use of Terminology and Connected Approaches in the History of Game Studies
punctum books

Video or Digital? Exploring the Use of Terminology and Connected Approaches in the History of Game Studies

  • Jasper van Vught(author)
  • Joris Veerbeek (author)
Chapter of: Historiographies of Game Studies: What It Has Been, What It Could Be(pp. 195–225)
  • Export Metadata
  • Metadata
  • Contributors

Export Metadata

Metadata
TitleVideo or Digital?
SubtitleExploring the Use of Terminology and Connected Approaches in the History of Game Studies
ContributorJasper van Vught(author)
Joris Veerbeek (author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.53288/0441.1.09
Landing pagehttps://punctumbooks.com/titles/historiographies-of-game-studies-what-it-has-been-what-it-could-be/
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
CopyrightJasper van Vught and Joris Veerbeek
Publisherpunctum books
Published on2025-07-25
Long abstract In this chapter, we use several computational text analyses methods to map the trends in game studies over the years connected to the use of specific terminology for our object of study (video game, computer game, digital game). Looking into a corpus of all the research articles published from 1999 onwards from a variety of game studies journals, we show how these terms are not just hollow descriptive categories but point to a cognitive reference point of more fitting approaches and points of interest. This becomes apparent in our finding that the term ‘video game’ correlates with scholarship on a variety of representational elements (e.g., ‘queer studies’, ‘game narrative’ and ‘gender studies’) much more so than the terms ‘digital game’ and ‘computer game’ do. It seems the visual emphasis of the prefix ‘video’ is (most likely unconsciously) inviting interest in the visual output of the medium, whereas ‘computer game’ and ‘digital game’ invite interest in its technological and medium-specific aspects. These findings serve as words of warning to be conscious of the terms we use for our object of study and the way in which these terms have and will encourage specific directions of our field.
Page rangepp. 195–225
Print length31 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Contributors

Jasper van Vught

(author)
Assistant Professor of New Media and Games at Utrecht University
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1384-5112

Jasper van Vught (he/him) is Assistant Professor of New Media and Games in the Department of Media and Culture Studies at Utrecht University. His research focuses on game theory and methodology, game ethics, and game history. He is part of the Centre for the Study of Digital Games and Play, has worked within an international research project into the age classification of games and has been involved with the Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision to preserve and canonize Dutch game history. He co-authored the book Videogame Formalism: On Form, Aesthetic Experience and Methodology (Amsterdam University Press, 2023).

Joris Veerbeek

(author)
Lecturer at Utrecht University

Joris Veerbeek (he/him) is Lecturer at the department of Media and Culture studies at Utrecht University and junior researcher at Utrecht Data School. He specializes in computational text analysis for humanities research and conducts research on the dynamics of the public debate on social media and in traditional media, with a specific focus on the role of social institutions.

Export Metadata

UK registered social enterprise and Community Interest Company (CIC).

Company registration 14549556

Metadata

  • By book
  • By publisher
  • GraphQL API
  • Export API

Resources

  • Downloads
  • Videos
  • Merch
  • Presentations
  • Service status

Contact

  • Email
  • Bluesky
  • Mastodon
  • Github

Copyright © 2026 Thoth Open Metadata. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.