| Title | 12. John Ruskin’s Painting Materials |
|---|---|
| Subtitle | A Quest for Durable Colour between Industry and Nature |
| Contributor | Tea Ghigo(author) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0501.12 |
| Landing page | http://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0501/chapters/10.11647/obp.0501.12 |
| License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
| Copyright | Tea Ghigo |
| Publisher | Open Book Publishers |
| Published on | 2026-05-11 |
| Long abstract | This chapter explores the impact of industrial progress on the artistic practice of John Ruskin, one of the most prominent art critics, cultural commentators and social philosophers of the Victorian era. Throughout his lifetime, Ruskin observed numerous technological advancements and often voiced his scepticism about their consequences. His critiques of industry, progress and other aspects of modernity sometimes earned him a reputation as a nostalgic figure inclined to idealise the past. Drawing on archival and material evidence, this chapter explores Ruskin’s complex relationship with industrial colour manufacture. I |
| Print length | 24 pages |
| Language | English (Original) |
| THEMA |
|
| BISAC |
|
| Keywords |
|
Tea Ghigo is a Lecturer in the History of Art, Materials and Technology at University College London and a Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries of London. She holds a joint PhD in Archaeometry from the University of Rome La Sapienza and the University of Hamburg, and previously worked as a postdoctoral researcher at the Ashmolean Museum, University of Oxford. Her research sits at the intersection of Heritage Science and Technical Art History, focusing on the material culture of Europe and the Mediterranean from Antiquity through the nineteenth century. Grounded in an evidence-based approach inspired by antiquarian traditions, her work combines close material investigation of artefacts with the study of historical texts to interpret the past. Passionate about museum communication, she is committed to expanding the visibility of materials and making techniques in museum narratives—both through her research and in her teaching—ultimately contributing to more inclusive and materially informed histories of art.