Skip to main content
Login
  1. Home
  2. Performance Research Methods
  3. 15. Autoethnography in Performance Studies: The Performativity of Queer Parenting
Open Book Publishers

15. Autoethnography in Performance Studies: The Performativity of Queer Parenting

  • Fabiola Camuti(author)
  • Annemijn van der Schaar(author)
Chapter of: Performance Research Methods: Interdisciplinary Methods for Theatre, Dance and Performance Studies(pp. 311–334)
  • Export Metadata
  • Metadata
  • Locations
  • Contributors
  • References

Export Metadata

Metadata
Title15. Autoethnography in Performance Studies
SubtitleThe Performativity of Queer Parenting
ContributorFabiola Camuti(author)
Annemijn van der Schaar(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0469.15
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0469/chapters/10.11647/obp.0469.15
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
CopyrightFabiola Camuti; Annemijn van der Schaar;
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2025-10-24
Long abstract

This chapter contributes to the discourse on methodologies in performance studies by examining autoethnography, highlighting its core elements, challenges, and applications.1 This method involves reflexive engagement with personal experiences and ethnographic self-exploration within a socio-cultural context, blending the roles of researcher and subject to uncover insights into personal narratives. The study builds on the work of Carolyn Ellis, Arthur Bochner, Stacy Holman Jones, Heewon Chang, and Tony E. Adams. The chapter includes a case study titled ‘Who’s the real mother: the performativity of queer parenting’. Performativity, in this context, refers to how actions and behaviours shape and reveal identities and social roles. This case study provides insights into the practical application of the method and the use of a theoretical lens to analyse personal experiences. It demonstrates how identity construction, societal expectations, and role negotiations are embedded in queer parenting. Additionally, the chapter discusses a participatory theatre project with formerly incarcerated individuals, showcasing the versatility of autoethnography in diverse and interdisciplinary research settings. By integrating theoretical foundations, case studies, and practical examples, this chapter enhances understanding of autoethnography and its ability to reveal the intricate nature of lived experiences.

Page rangepp. 311–334
Print length24 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Locations
Landing PageFull text URLPlatform
PDFhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0469/chapters/10.11647/obp.0469.15Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0469.15.pdfFull text URL
HTMLhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0469/chapters/10.11647/obp.0469.15Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0469/ch15.xhtmlFull text URLPublisher Website
Contributors

Fabiola Camuti

(author)
Professor of Critical Creative Pedagogies at University of the Arts Utrecht
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1097-2957

Fabiola Camuti (she/her) is Professor of Critical Creative Pedagogies at HKU University of the Arts Utrecht. She has been a visiting researcher and practitioner in various countries and institutions (Italy, France, Denmark, UK, US, NL), as well as a researcher and lecturer at the Departments of Theatre Studies (University of Amsterdam) and Media and Culture (Utrecht University), and at the Professorship Art Education as Critical Tactics (ArtEZ University of the Arts). She conducts research, leads projects, and gives seminars on topics including socially-just pedagogies and pedagogies of care, participatory arts, politics of arts and cultural education, and artistic research. Additionally, she is chair of the HKU Research Ethics Committee and serves as programme leader of Research in Education for the KUO sector (Dutch Association of Universities of Applied Sciences), where she coordinates a national working group aimed at strengthening the knowledge ecosystem and research culture within art universities.

Annemijn van der Schaar

(author)
researcher, guest lecturer, and trained anthropologist currently pursuing a PhD at University of Humanistic Studies
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2787-0842

Annemijn van der Schaar (they/them) is a researcher, guest lecturer, and trained anthropologist currently pursuing a PhD at the University of Humanistic Studies in Utrecht. Situated within mad studies and trans studies, their work draws on lived experience to examine questions of hermeneutical (in)justice for people with psychiatric diagnoses. Their research critically engages with epistemic marginalisation, exploring how knowledge, power, and care intersect. Annemijn uses a range of methodologies, including autoethnography, narrative research, and arts-based approaches, and has conducted research in the field of Disability Studies.

References
  1. Adams, Tony E. 2008. “A Review of Narrative Ethics.” Qualitative Inquiry 14 (2) (March): 175–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800407304
  2. Adams, Tony E., Carolyn Ellis, and Stacy Holman Jones. 2022. Handbook of Autoethnography. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429431760
  3. Adams, Tony E., Stacy Holman Jones, and Carolyn Ellis. 2015. Autoethnography: Understanding Qualitative Research. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12111
  4. Anderson, Leon. 2006. “Analytic Autoethnography.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 35 (4): 373–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912416052804
  5. Basharat, Tahira, and Muhammad Awais Shaukat. 2019. “A Critical Analysis of Some Ideals of Postmodernism in Various Fields of Knowledge and Morality.” Journal of Islamic Thought and Civilization 9 (2): 112–26. https://doi.org/10.32350/jitc
  6. Butler, Judith. 1988. “Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory.” Theatre Journal 40 (4): 519–31. https://doi.org/10.2307/3207893
  7. Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.
  8. Camuti, Fabiola. 2020 “Performative Approaches to the Cultural Policy Field.” In Situated Knowing, Epistemic Perspectives on Performance, edited by Ewa Bal and Mateusz Chaberski, 104–17. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367809584-8
  9. Camuti, Fabiola. 2022. “Critical Tactics in Participatory Art.” In Powertools for Young Artists: Artistic Strategies for Equality, edited by Isis Freitas Vale Germano, Fabiola Camuti, Els Cornelis, Catelijne de Muijnck and Aude Mgba. APRIA Platform.
  10. Chang, Heewon. 2008. Autoethnography as Method. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315433370
  11. Chang, Heewon. 2022. “Individual and Collaborative Autoethnography for Social Science Research.” In Handbook of Autoethnography, edited by Tony E. Adams, Carolyn Ellis and Stacy Holman Jones, 53–66. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429431760-6
  12. Church, Kathryn. 1995. Forbidden Narratives: Critical Autobiography as Social Science. Routledge.
  13. Denzin, Norman Kent, and Yvonna Sessions Lincoln. 2005. “Preface.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Norman K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, IX–XIX. Sage.
  14. Ellis, Carolyn. 2004. The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel about Autoethnography. AltaMira Press.
  15. Ellis, Carolyn, and Arthur P. Bochner. 2000. “Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as Subject.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by Norman Kent Denzin and Yvonna Sessions Lincoln, 733–68. Sage.
  16. Ellis, Carolyn, Tony E. Adams, and Arthur P. Bochner. 2011. “Autoethnography: An Overview.” Historical Social Research 36 (4): 273–90. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.36.2011.4.273-290
  17. Guba, Egon G., and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 1989. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Sage Publications.
  18. Johnson-Bailey, Juanita. 2021. “A Scholarly Journey to Autoethnography: A Way to Understand, Survive and Resist.” In Handbook of Research Methods on Gender and Management, edited by Valerie Stead, Carole Elliot, and Sharon Mavin, 10–24. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788977937.00008
  19. Lapadat, Judith C. 2017. “Ethics in Autoethnography and Collaborative Autoethnography.” Qualitative Inquiry 23 (8): 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417704462
  20. McAvinchey, Caoimhe. 2011. Theatre & Prison. Palgrave Macmillan.
  21. McKenzie, Lara. 2022. “Parenthood: Beyond Maternity and Paternity.” Feminist Anthropology 3 (2): 299–306, https://doi.org/10.1002/fea2.12105
  22. Parker, Andrew, and Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, eds. 1996. Performativity and Performance. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203699928
  23. Saldaña, Johnny. 2016. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage Publications.
  24. Sale, Alessandro, ed. 2016. Environmental Experience and Plasticity of the Developing Brain. Wiley Blackwell.
  25. Sparkes, Andrew. 2022. “When Judgment Calls: Making Sense of Criteria for Evaluating Different Forms of Autoethnography.” In Handbook of Autoethnography, edited by Tony E. Adams, Carolyn Ellis, and Stacy Holman Jones, 263–76. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429431760-25
  26. Tullis, Jillian A. 2022. “Self and Others: Ethics in Autoethnographic Research.” In Handbook of Autoethnography, edited by Tony E. Adams, Carolyn Ellis, and Stacy Holman Jones, 101–13. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429431760-10
  27. Van Praag, Henriette, Gerd Kempermann, and Fred H. Gage. 2000. “Neural Consequences of Environmental Enrichment.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 1 (3): 191–98. https://doi.org/10.1038/35044558

Export Metadata

UK registered social enterprise and Community Interest Company (CIC).

Company registration 14549556

Metadata

  • By book
  • By publisher
  • GraphQL API
  • Export API

Resources

  • Downloads
  • Videos
  • Merch
  • Presentations
  • Service status

Contact

  • Email
  • Bluesky
  • Mastodon
  • Github

Copyright © 2026 Thoth Open Metadata. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.