Skip to main content
Login
  1. Home
  2. More with More: Investing in the Energy Transition
  3. 10. Investing in Critical Raw Materials for the Clean-Tech Transition in the EU
Open Book Publishers

10. Investing in Critical Raw Materials for the Clean-Tech Transition in the EU

  • Roberto Zoboli(author)
Chapter of: More with More: Investing in the Energy Transition: 2025 European Public Investment Outlook(pp. 157–176)
  • Export Metadata
  • Metadata
  • Locations
  • Contributors
  • References

Export Metadata

Metadata
Title10. Investing in Critical Raw Materials for the Clean-Tech Transition in the EU
ContributorRoberto Zoboli(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0499.10
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0499/chapters/10.11647/obp.0499.10
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
CopyrightRoberto Zoboli
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2025-12-08
Long abstract

The procurement of critical raw materials (CRM) could become a fundamental barrier to the development of clean technology and net-zero manufacturing in the EU, thus endangering the achievement of major objectives of EU self-sufficiency in the climate-energy transition. The EU policy framework includes several measures introduced in 2024 and 2025 to push both clean-tech manufacturing and security of supply of CRM in the framework of the EU Competitiveness Compass and the Clean Industrial Deal of 2025. Criticality of materials has been defined as a combination of “economic importance” and “supply risk”. On the side of “economic importance”, an increasing demand for CRM comes from net-zero energy technologies as well as from digital and military technologies. The EU shows a mixed picture in clean-tech sectors: it holds a leadership position in some areas, while in others it faces a high, and increasing, dependency on imports. Although significant investments are underway to boost manufacturing autonomy, these efforts may struggle to keep pace with rapidly rising demand and intensifying external competition, particularly from China. Therefore, the security of supply of CRM has a key role in providing robustness to EU clean-tech value chains. On the side of the ‘supply risk’, CRM have entered a phase marked by international tensions and conflicts, exposing the EU’s high dependency on exporting countries that can quickly become unreliable. Responses and strategies include diversifying the portfolio of supplier countries, expanding domestic mining within the EU, increasing recycling efforts, and investing in research and innovation. All these approaches face distinct barriers, varying degrees of feasibility, and different implementation timeframes. The first consequence of the 2024 CRM policies has been the approval of forty-seven “strategic projects” within the EU and thirteen outside the EU. It is important that these projects are matched by additional investments in clean-tech manufacturing to keep a balanced development across the whole EU domestic value chain for the energy transition. However, a fundamental uncertainty now surrounds the CRM issue, at both the EU and global scale.

Page rangepp. 157–176
Print length20 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Locations
Landing PageFull text URLPlatform
PDFhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0499/chapters/10.11647/obp.0499.10Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0499.10.pdfFull text URL
HTMLhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0499/chapters/10.11647/obp.0499.10Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0499/ch10.xhtmlFull text URLPublisher Website
Contributors

Roberto Zoboli

(author)
Full Professor of Economic Policy; Research Associate at Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4662-5949

Roberto Zoboli is Full Professor of Economic Policy and teaches “Economic Policies for Resources and the Environment” and “Economics of Natural Resources” at the Università Cattolica del S. Cuore, Milan. At the Cattolica, he has been Vice-rector for Research and Sustainability and Director of ASA—Graduate School on the Environment. In the past, he has been a researcher at Nomisma S.p.A., Cariplo Foundation for Scientific Research, and the Research Office of Montedison S.p.A. For twelve years, Roberto has been Research Director at the National Research Council, where, at present, he is Research Associate at IRCrES—Research Institute on Sustainable Economic Growth. He is Board member of SEEDS, the inter-university centre on “Sustainability, Environmental Economics and Dynamics Studies” that gathers environmental and innovation economists from twelve Italian universities. Roberto has been task leader in FP7 and Horizon 2020 projects, and project leader of about seventy research projects at the international, national, and regional level. Since 2001, he has been Task leader within different Topic Centres of the EEA—European Environment Agency, at present the ETC CE—European Topic Centre on Circular Economy and Resource Use (2022–2026). Roberto is author/co-author of about 170 publications in peer-reviewed journals and edited books, in English and Italian, and about seventy research papers and published research reports in the areas of environmental and resource economics, sustainable development, environmental policy, and the economics of eco-innovation.

References
  1. Baccianti, C. (2022) “The Public Spending Needs of Reaching the EU’s Climate Targets”, in F. Cerniglia and F. Saraceno (eds), Greening Europe: 2022 European Public Investment Outlook. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, pp. 107–128, https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0328.08
  2. Bruegel (2025) “European Clean Tech Tracker”, https://www.bruegel.org/dataset/european-clean-tech-tracker
  3. Carrara, S., S. Bobba, D. Blagoeva, P. Alves Dias, A. Cavalli, K. Georgitzikis, M. Grohol, A. Itul, T. Kuzov, C. Latunussa, L. Lyons, G. Malano, T. Maury, A. Prior Arce, J. Somers, T. Telsnig, C. Veeh, D. Wittmer, C. Black, D. Pennington, and M. Christou (2023) Supply Chain Analysis and Material Demand Forecast in Strategic Technologies and Sectors in the EU—A Foresight Study. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, https://doi.org/10.2760/386650
  4. D’Amato, A., A. Pronti, S. Paleari, G. Romaldi, S. Speck, S. Tagliapietra, and R. Zoboli (2024) Investment Needs and Gaps for the Sustainability Transition in Europe: Rethinking the European Green Deal as an EU Industrial Strategy. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency, https://www.eionet.europa.eu/etcs/etc-ce/products/etc-ce-report-2024-8-investment-needs-and-gaps-for-the-sustainability-transition-in-europe-rethinking-the-european-green-deal-as-an-eu-industrial-strategy
  5. Di Francesco, E., R. S. Gilli, P. Jensen, S. Manoochehri, G. Marin, A. Specker, S. Tagliapietra, and R. Zoboli (2024) Environmental Impact of Material Supply Chain Disruptions. Copenhagen: EEA, https://www.eionet.europa.eu/etcs/etc-ce/products/etc-ce-report-2024-3-environmental-impact-of-material-supply-chain-disruptionsl
  6. EEA—European Environment Agency (2023) Investments in the Sustainability Transition: Leveraging Green Industrial Policy against Emerging Constraints. Copenhagen: EEA, https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/investments-into-the-sustainability-transition
  7. EIB (2025) Investment Report 2024/2025: Innovation, Integration and Simplification in Europe. Luxembourg: European Investment Bank, https://www.eib.org/en/publications/20240354-investment-report-2024
  8. European Commission (2023) Study on the Critical Raw Materials for the EU 2023. Brussels: European Commission, https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/57318397-fdd4-11ed-a05c-01aa75ed71a1
  9. European Commission (2024a) The Future of European Competitiveness Part A | A Competitiveness Strategy for Europe (Draghi’s Report). Brussels: European Commission, https://commission.europa.eu/topics/eu-competitiveness/draghi-report_en#paragraph_47059
  10. European Commission (2024b) “Regulation (EU) 2024/1735 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on Establishing a Framework of Measures for Strengthening Europe’s Net-zero Technology Manufacturing Ecosystem and Amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 (Text with EEA Relevance),” https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/industry/sustainability/net-zero-industry-act_en
  11. European Commission (2024c) “Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024 Establishing a Framework for Ensuring a Secure and Sustainable Supply of Critical Raw Materials and Amending Regulations (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1724 and (EU) 2019/1020 (Text with EEA Relevance)”, https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/raw-materials/areas-specific-interest/critical-raw-materials_en
  12. European Commission (2025a) “A Competitiveness Compass for the EU, Brussels, 29.1.2025”, COM(2025) 30 final, https://commission.europa.eu/topics/eu-competitiveness/competitiveness-compass_en
  13. European Commission (2025b) “The Clean Industrial Deal: A Joint Roadmap for Competitiveness and Decarbonization”, Brussels, 26.2.2025”, COM(2025) 85 final, https://commission.europa.eu/topics/eu-competitiveness/clean-industrial-deal_en
  14. European Commission (2025c) “Commission Selects 47 Strategic Projects to Secure and Diversify Access to Raw Materials in the EU”, 25 March, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_25_864
  15. European Commission (2025d) “Commission Selects 13 Strategic Projects in Third Countries to Secure Access to Raw Materials and to Support Local Value Creation”, 4 June, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_25_1419
  16. European Parliament (2024) “The Role of Research and Innovation in Ensuring a Safe and Sustainable Supply of Critical Raw Materials in the EU”, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/stoa/en/document/EPRS_STU(2024)762848
  17. Greenland (2025) “Greenland Mineral Resources Strategy 2025–2029. A Sustainable Mineral Resources Sector”, https://naalakkersuisut.gl/-/media/nyheder/2025/01/3101_ny_raastofstrategi/eng_greenland-mineral-resources-strategy-2025-2029.pdf
  18. IEA (2021) Net Zero by 2050. A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector. Paris: IEA, https://www.iea.org/reports/net-zero-by-2050
  19. IEA (2024) Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2024. Paris: IEA, https://www.iea.org/reports/global-critical-minerals-outlook-2024
  20. IEA (2025) Energy Technology Perspectives 2024. Paris: IEA, https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-technology-perspectives-2024
  21. IRENA (2023) Geopolitics of the Energy Transition: Critical Materials. Abu Dabhi: IRENA, https://www.irena.org/Publications/2023/Jul/Geopolitics-of-the-Energy-Transition-Critical-Materials
  22. Le Mouel, M., and N. Poitiers (2023) Why Europe’s Critical Raw Materials Strategy Has to Be International: In Ensuring Supplies of Critical Raw Materials, the European Union Cannot Rely on Domestic Measures Alone. Brussels: Bruegel, https://www.bruegel.org/analysis/why-europes-critical-raw-materials-strategy-has-be-international
  23. Specker A., S. Manoochehri, R. Gilli, G. Marin, R. Zoboli, P. Nuss, E. Pohjalainen, and P. Jensen (2025) Environmental Impact of Material’s Supply Chain Disruption. The Cases of Aluminium and Lithium. Copenhagen: EEA—European Environment Agency, https://www.eionet.europa.eu/etcs/etc-ce/products/etc-ce-report-2025-5-environmental-impact-of-materials-supply-chain-disruption-the-cases-of-aluminium-and-lithium
  24. World Bank (2025) “Commodity Markets”, https://www.worldbank.org/en/research/commodity-markets

Export Metadata

UK registered social enterprise and Community Interest Company (CIC).

Company registration 14549556

Metadata

  • By book
  • By publisher
  • GraphQL API
  • Export API

Resources

  • Downloads
  • Videos
  • Merch
  • Presentations
  • Service status

Contact

  • Email
  • Bluesky
  • Mastodon
  • Github

Copyright © 2026 Thoth Open Metadata. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.