Skip to main content
Login
  1. Home
  2. More with More: Investing in the Energy Transition
  3. 8. Research and Innovation Policy for the Energy Transition in the EU
Open Book Publishers

8. Research and Innovation Policy for the Energy Transition in the EU

  • Francesco Pasimeni(author)
  • Willem Klok(author)
  • Floor Alkemade(author)
Chapter of: More with More: Investing in the Energy Transition: 2025 European Public Investment Outlook(pp. 125–142)
  • Export Metadata
  • Metadata
  • Locations
  • Contributors
  • References

Export Metadata

Metadata
Title8. Research and Innovation Policy for the Energy Transition in the EU
ContributorFrancesco Pasimeni(author)
Willem Klok(author)
Floor Alkemade(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0499.08
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0499/chapters/10.11647/obp.0499.08
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
CopyrightFrancesco Pasimeni; Willem Klok; Floor Alkemade
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2025-12-08
Long abstract

The European Union’s energy transition has entered a new phase, where the focus of research and innovation (R&I) policy must shift from advancing individual renewable technologies to enabling their systemic integration. This chapter draws on sustainability transitions literature to analyze the evolving demands on the EU’s energy innovation system, emphasizing the need for coordinated governance, societal engagement, and institutional reform. A systems-based R&I approach is essential to address the complexity of integrating renewables, managing sociotechnical change, and ensuring economic and social sustainability. Special attention is given to the role of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), energy communities, and sustainable finance mechanisms as critical drivers of bottom-up innovation and structural transformation. The chapter also engages with recent EU-level strategic reflections, including competitiveness and innovation agendas, to highlight how climate objectives, economic resilience, and social cohesion are increasingly interconnected. It offers recommendations for policymakers seeking to realign R&I strategies in support of a transformative, inclusive, and competitive European energy transition.

Page rangepp. 125–142
Print length18 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Locations
Landing PageFull text URLPlatform
PDFhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0499/chapters/10.11647/obp.0499.08Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0499.08.pdfFull text URL
HTMLhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0499/chapters/10.11647/obp.0499.08Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0499/ch8.xhtmlFull text URLPublisher Website
Contributors

Francesco Pasimeni

(author)
Assistant Professor in Economics of Technological Change at Eindhoven University of Technology
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4255-2180

Francesco Pasimeni is Assistant Professor in Economics of Technological Change at Eindhoven University of Technology. His research focuses on the economics of green innovation and modelling agent behaviour toward sustainable consumption solutions. Previously, he worked as an Associate Programme Officer at IRENA, a Scientific Policy Analyst at the JRC European Commission, and held positions in the private sector. He holds a BSc and MSc in Industrial Engineering from the University of Salento (Italy), as well as an MSc and PhD in Science and Technology from SPRU, University of Sussex (UK).

Willem Klok

(author)
Doctoral Candidate at Eindhoven University of Technology
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1317-4547

Willem Klok is a Doctoral Candidate in Industrial Engineering and Innovation

Sciences at Eindhoven University of Technology, in the Technology, Innovation, and

Society group. His research examines how the financial system can transform to

support sustainability, rather than undermine it. Taking a transitions perspective, he

explores what kind of systemic change is needed to move beyond short-term, profitdriven incentives and toward a more resilient and responsible alternative. His work

combines conceptual analysis with computational modelling to better understand

pathways for aligning finance with long-term social and ecological goals.

Floor Alkemade

(author)
Full Professor of Economics and Governance of Technological Innovation at Eindhoven University of Technology
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2231-1913

Floor Alkemade is a Full Professor of Economics and Governance of Technological Innovation at Eindhoven University of Technology. Her key areas of expertise include innovation, clean tech, and sustainability. She received an ERC Consolidator grant (2022), a Vidi grant (2014), and a Veni grant (2008) to work on research projects on innovation for sustainability. Floor received her PhD in Agent Based Evolutionary Economics, from TU/e in 2004. Her PhD work was done at the Dutch National Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science (CWI). She holds an MSc in Artificial Intelligence from VU University Amsterdam. Floor is Associate Editor of the Journal of Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.

References
  1. Ahlström, H., and D. Monciardini (2022) “The Regulatory Dynamics of Sustainable Finance: Paradoxical Success and Limitations of EU Reforms”, J. Bus. Ethics 177, 193–212, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04763-x
  2. Alkemade, F., B. de Bruin, A. El-Feiaz, F. Pasimeni, L. Niamir, and R. Wade (2024), “Social Tipping Dynamics in the Energy System”, Earth System Dynamics 15.2, 485–500,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-485-2024
  3. Anadón, L. D. (2012) “Missions-oriented RD&D Institutions in Energy between 2000 and 2010: A Comparative Analysis of China, the United Kingdom, and the United States”, Research Policy 41.10, 1742–1756, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.015
  4. Aphecetche, T. (2025) Investment Barriers to Sustainable Finance: How to Enable the Transition in G20 Economies, Economic Brief 083. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2765/50647
  5. Avelino, F., J. Grin, B. Pel, and S. Jhagroe (2016) “The Politics of Sustainability Transitions”, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 18.5, 557–567, https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1216782
  6. Bento, N., A. Nunez-Jimenez, and N. Kittner (2025) “Decline Processes in Technological Innovation Systems: Lessons from Energy Technologies”, Research Policy 54.3, 105174, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105174
  7. Bergek, A., S. Jacobsson, B. Carlsson, S. Lindmark, and A. Rickne (2008) “Analyzing the Functional Dynamics of Technological Innovation Systems: A Scheme of Analysis”, Res. Policy 37, 407–429, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003
  8. Burch, S., M. Andrachuk, D. Carey, N. Frantzeskaki, H. Schroeder, N. Mischkowski, and D. Loorbach (2016) “Governing and Accelerating Transformative Entrepreneurship: Exploring the Potential for Small Business Innovation on Urban Sustainability Transitions”, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 22, 26–32, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.04.002
  9. Chatzistamoulou, N., and E. Tyllianakis (2022) “Commitment of European SMEs to Resource Efficiency Actions to Achieve Sustainability Transition. A Feasible Reality or an Elusive Goal?”, Journal of Environmental Management 321, 115937, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115937
  10. Crockett, A. (2011) “What Financial System for the 21st Century”, 26 June, Bank for International Settlements, https://www.bis.org/events/agm2011/sp110626.htm
  11. Crona, B., C. Folke, and V. Galaz (2021) “The Anthropocene Reality of Financial Risk”, One Earth 4, 618–628, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.016
  12. Dasgupta, P., and S. Levin (2023) “Economic Factors Underlying Biodiversity Loss”, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 378, 20220197, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0197
  13. Draghi, M. (2024) The Future of European Competitiveness. Brussels: European Commission, https://commission.europa.eu/topics/eu-competitiveness/draghi-report_en
  14. Dyck, A., K. V. Lins, L. Roth, and H. F. Wagner (2019) “Do Institutional Investors Drive Corporate Social Responsibility? International Evidence”, J. Financ. Econ. 131, 693–714, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.013
  15. Eitan, A., and M. P. Hekkert (2023) “Locked in Transition? Towards a Conceptualization of Path-dependence Lock-ins in the Renewable Energy Landscape”, Energy Research & Social Science 106, 103316, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103316
  16. European Commission (2024) “Overview of Sustainable Finance”, https://finance.ec.europa.eu/sustainable-finance/overview-sustainable-finance_en
  17. European Commission DG FISMA (2018) “Financing a Sustainable European Economy. Final Report 2018 by the High-Level Expert Group on Sustainable Finance”, https://finance.ec.europa.eu/publications/high-level-expert-group-sustainable-finance-hleg_en
  18. European Commission DG RTD, B. Cavicchi, O. Peiffer-Smadja, J. Ravet, and A. Hobza (2023) The Transformative Nature of the European Framework Programme for Research and Innovation—Analysis of Its Evolution between 2002–2023. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/73000
  19. European Commission DG RTD, K. Richardson, A. Renda, F. Alkemade, R. Walz, et al. (2024) Embedding Anticipatory Governance in Europe’s Transitions. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777/3778181
  20. European Commission JRC, S. Schwaag-Serger, L. Soete, and J. Stierna (2024) Scientific Report—For an Innovative, Sustainable and Fair Economy in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/0336180
  21. European Innovation Council (2025) “EIC Board Calls for National and Regional Synergies to Boost Deep Tech Innovation”, European Innovation Council and SMEs Executive Agency, 12 May, https://eic.ec.europa.eu/news/eic-board-calls-national-and-regional-synergies-boost-deep-tech-innovation-2025-05-12_en
  22. Eurostat (2024) “Digitalisation in Europe—2024 Edition”, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/interactive-publications/digitalisation-2024
  23. Favino, R., N. Conte, A. De Maleville, E. Garcia Monreal, E. Montanari, A. Paganini, M. Sangiorgi, and C. Sfalagkiaris, C. (2025) Emerging Risks and Opportunities for EU Internal Security Stemming from New Technologies. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/9617320
  24. Fawcett, T., and S. Hampton (2020) “Why and How Energy Efficiency Policy Should Address SMEs”, Energy Policy 140, 111337, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111337
  25. Foster, J. B. (2001) “Ecology Against Capitalism”, Mon. Rev. 53, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.14452/MR-053-05-2001-09_1
  26. Gallagher, K. S., A. Grübler, L. Kuhl, G. Nemet, and C. Wilson (2012) “The Energy Technology Innovation System”, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 37.1, 137–162, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-060311-133915
  27. Geels, F. W., T. Schwanen, S. Sorrell, K. Jenkins, and B. K. Sovacool (2018) “Reducing Energy Demand through Low Carbon Innovation: A Sociotechnical Transitions Perspective and Thirteen Research Debates’, Energy Research & Social Science 40, 23–35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.003
  28. González Martínez, C. I. (2021) “Overview of Global and European Institutional Sustainable Finance Initiatives”, Banco de Espana Article 30, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3937147
  29. GSIA—Global Sustainable Investment Alliance (2022) Global Sustainable Investment Review 2022, https://www.gsi-alliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/GSIA-Report-2022.pdf
  30. Haanyika, C. M. (2006) “Rural Electrification Policy and Institutional Linkages”, Energy Policy 34.17, 2977–2993, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.05.008
  31. Hafner, S., A. Jones, A. Anger-Kraavi, and J. Pohl (2020) “Closing the Green Finance Gap—A Systems Perspective”, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 34, 26–60, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.11.007
  32. Hargreaves, T., S. Hielscher, G. Seyfang, and A. Smith (2013) “Grassroots Innovations in Community Energy: The Role of Intermediaries in Niche Development”, Global Environmental Change 23.5, 868–880, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.008
  33. Hervás-Oliver, J. L., M. D. Parrilli, A. Rodríguez-Pose, and F. Sempere-Ripoll (2021) “The Rivers of SME Innovation in the Regions of the EU”, Research Policy 50.9, 104316, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104316
  34. Hirsh, R. F., and B. K. Sovacool (2013) “Wind Turbines and Invisible Technology: Unarticulated Reasons for Local Opposition to Wind Energy”, Technology and Culture 54.4, 705–734, https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/tech.2013.0131
  35. Hoicka, C. E., J. Lowitzsch, M. C. Brisbois, A. Kumar, and L. R. Camargo (2021) “Implementing a Just Renewable Energy Transition: Policy Advice for Transposing the New European Rules for Renewable Energy Communities”, Energy Policy 156, 112435, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112435
  36. IEA (2023) World Energy Outlook 2023. Paris: IEA, https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2023
  37. IEA (2024a) Renewables 2024. Paris: IEA, https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2024
  38. IEA (2024b) World Energy Outlook 2024. Paris: IEA, https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2024
  39. IMF—International Monetary Fund (2022) Crisis Upon Crisis. Washington, DC: IMF, https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/ar/2022/
  40. IPCC (2022) Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, R. Slade, A. Al Khourdajie, R. van Diemen, D. McCollum, M. Pathak, S. Some, P. Vyas, R. Fradera, M. Belkacemi, A. Hasija, G. Lisboa, S. Luz, J. Malley, (eds.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157926
  41. IRENA (2024) World Energy Transitions Outlook 2024: 1.5°C Pathway. Abu Dhabi: IRENA, https://www.irena.org/-/media/Files/IRENA/Agency/Publication/2024/Nov/IRENA_World_energy_transitions_outlook_2024.pdf
  42. Jäger, J., and L. Schmidt (2020) “Global Green Finance and Sustainability: Insights for Progressive Strategies”, J. Für Entwicklungspolitik 36, 4–30, https://doi.org/10.20446/JEP-2414-3197-36-4-4
  43. Jenkins, K., B. K. Sovacool, and D. McCauley (2018) “Humanizing Sociotechnical Transitions through Energy Justice: An Ethical Framework for Global Transformative Change”, Energy Policy 117, 66–74, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.036
  44. Kern, F., K. S. Rogge, and M. Howlett (2019) “Policy Mixes for Sustainability Transitions: New Approaches and Insights through Bridging Innovation and Policy Studies”, Research Policy 48.10, 103832, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103832
  45. Kim, Y. J., and C. Wilson (2019) “Analysing Future Change in the EU’s Energy Innovation System”, Energy Strategy Reviews 24, 279–299, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.04.012
  46. Kitchens, C., and P. Fishback (2015) “Flip the Switch: The Impact of the Rural Electrification Administration 1935–1940”, The Journal of Economic History 75.4, 1161–1195.
  47. Klok, W. (2025) “The Limits of Sustainable Finance: A Systems Framework for Evaluating Transformative Change”, https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=5316711
  48. Krause, K., and D. Battenfeld (2019) “Coming Out of the Niche? Social Banking in Germany: An Empirical Analysis of Consumer Characteristics and Market Size”, J. Bus. Ethics 155, 889–911, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3491-9
  49. Lagoarde-Segot, T. (2019) “Sustainable Finance: A Critical Realist Perspective”, Res. Int. Bus. Finance 47, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.04.010
  50. Lauber, V., and S. Jacobsson (2016) “The Politics and Economics of Constructing, Contesting and Restricting Socio-political Space for Renewables—The German Renewable Energy Act”, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 18, 147–163, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.06.005
  51. Lee, N., H. Sameen, and M. Cowling (2015) “Access to Finance for Innovative SMEs since the Financial Crisis”, Research Policy 44.2, 370–380, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.09.008
  52. Lindberg, M. B., J. Markard, and A. D. Andersen (2019) “Policies, Actors and Sustainability Transition Pathways: A Study of the EU’s Energy Policy Mix”, Research Policy 48.10, 103668, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.09.003
  53. Markard, J., and B. Truffer (2006) “Innovation Processes in Large Technical Systems: Market Liberalization as a Driver for Radical Change?”, Research Policy 35.5, 609–625, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.008
  54. Masini, A., and E. Menichetti (2013) “Investment Decisions in the Renewable Energy Sector: An Analysis of Non-financial Drivers”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80.3, 510–524, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.08.003
  55. Mazzucato, M., and G. Semieniuk (2018) “Financing Renewable Energy: Who Is Financing What and Why It Matters”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 127, 8–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.021
  56. Moallemi, E. A., and S. Malekpour (2018), “A Participatory Exploratory Modelling Approach for Long-term Planning in Energy Transitions”, Energy Research & Social Science 35, 205–216, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.022
  57. Naidoo, C. P. (2020) “Relating Financial Systems to Sustainability Transitions: Challenges, Demands and Design Features”, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 36, 270–290, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.10.004
  58. NGFS—Network for Greening the Financial System (2019) A Call for Action: Climate Change as a Source of Financial Risk, https://www.ngfs.net/system/files/import/ngfs/medias/documents/ngfs_first_comprehensive_report_-_17042019_0.pdf
  59. OECD (2022) Global Outlook on Financing for Sustainable Development 2023. Paris: OECD, https://doi.org/10.1787/fcbe6ce9-en
  60. OECD (2024), “Framework for Anticipatory Governance of Emerging Technologies”, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers 165. Paris: OECD, https://doi.org/10.1787/0248ead5-en
  61. Pástor, L., R. F. Stambaugh, and L. A. Taylor (2022) “Dissecting Green Returns”, J. Financ. Econ. 146, 403–424, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2022.07.007
  62. Peters, J., M. Harsdorff, and F. Ziegler (2009) “Rural Electrification: Accelerating Impacts with Complementary Services”, Energy for Sustainable Development 13.1, 38–42, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2009.01.004
  63. Peuckert, J., and F. Kern (2023) “How User Innovation Communities Contribute to Sustainability Transitions. An Exploration of Three Online Communities”, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 49, 100785, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2023.100785
  64. Pietsch, A., and D. Salakhova (2022) “Pricing of Green Bonds: Drivers and Dynamics of the Greenium”, ECB Working Paper 2022/2728, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4227559
  65. Pyrgou, A., A. Kylili, and P. A. Fokaides (2016) “The Future of the Feed-in Tariff (FiT) Scheme in Europe: The Case of Photovoltaics”, Energy Policy 95, 94–102, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.048
  66. Radicic, D., and G. Pugh (2017) “R&D Programmes, Policy Mix, and the ‘European Paradox’: Evidence from European SMEs”, Science and Public Policy 44.4, 497–512, https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw077
  67. Raven, R., and B. Walrave (2020) “Overcoming Transformational Failures through Policy Mixes in the Dynamics of Technological Innovation Systems”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change 153, 119297, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.008
  68. Raworth, K. (2018) Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think like a 21st Century Economist. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
  69. Reuters (2022) “Dutch Pension Giant ABP Set to Sell Laggards as Sharpens Climate Focus”, 23 December, Reuters, https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/dutch-pension-giant-abp-overhaul-portfolio-sustainability-drive-2022-12-23/
  70. Schot, J., L. Kanger, and G. Verbong (2016) “The Roles of Users in Shaping Transitions to New Energy Systems”, Nature Energy 1.5, 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.54
  71. Schot, J., and W. E. Steinmueller (2018) “Three Frames for Innovation Policy: R&D, Systems of Innovation and Transformative Change”, Research Policy 47.9, 1554–1567, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
  72. Schleich, J., A. Durand, and H. Brugger (2021) “How Effective Are EU Minimum Energy Performance Standards and Energy Labels for Cold Appliances?”, Energy Policy 149, 112069, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112069
  73. Seyfang, G., and A. Haxeltine (2012) “Growing Grassroots Innovations: Exploring the Role of Community-based Initiatives in Governing Sustainable Energy Transitions”, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 30.3, 381-400, https://doi.org/10.1068/c10222
  74. Seto, K. C., S. J. Davis, R. B. Mitchell, E. C. Stokes, G. Unruh, and D. Urge-Vorsatz (2016) “Carbon Lock-in: Types, Causes, and Policy Implications”, Annual Review of Environment and Resources 41.1, 425–452, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934
  75. Sisodia, A., and G. C. Maheshwari (2023) “Exploring Sustainable Finance: A Review and Future Research Agenda”, Vision, https://doi.org/10.1177/09722629231209177
  76. Sovacool, B. K., D. J. Hess, S. Amir, F. W. Geels, R. Hirsh, L. R. Medina, C. Miller, C. A. Palavicino, R. Phadke, M. Ryghaug et al. (2020) “Sociotechnical Agendas: Reviewing Future Directions for Energy and Climate Research”, Energy Research & Social Science 70, 101617, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101617
  77. Starks, L. T. (2023) “Presidential Address: Sustainable Finance and ESG Issues—Value versus Values”, The Journal of Finance 78.4, 1837–1872, https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13255
  78. Testa, G., R. Compano, A. Correia, and E. Rückert (2022) In Search of EU Unicorns—What Do We Know about Them. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC127712
  79. UN—United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (2024) Report of the Inter-Agency Task Force on Financing for Development 2024. Financing for Sustainable Development Report: Financing for Development at a Crossroads. New Yor: United Nations Publications, https://doi.org/10.18356/9789213588635
  80. UNEP—United Nations Environment Programme (2022) Emissions Gap Report 2022: The Closing Window — Climate Crisis Calls for Rapid Transformation of Societies. Nairobi: UNEP, https://www.unep.org/emissions-gap-report-2022
  81. UNEP—United Nations Environment Programme (2023a) Emissions Gap Report 2023: Broken Record—Temperatures Hit New Highs, Yet World Fails to Cut Emissions (Again). Nairobi: UNEP, https://doi.org/10.59117/20.500.11822/43922
  82. UNEP—United Nations Environment Programme (2023b) Responsible Banking: Towards Real-world Impact. Geneva: UN, https://www.unepfi.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/PRB-Second-Progress-Report-2023.pdf
  83. Unruh, G. C. (2000) “Understanding Carbon Lock-in”, Energy Policy 28.12, 817–830, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7
  84. Vezzoni, R. (2023) “Green Growth for Whom, How and Why? The REPowerEU Plan and the Inconsistencies of European Union Energy Policy”, Energy Research & Social Science 101, 103134, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103134
  85. Voulvoulis, N., T. Giakoumis, C. Hunt, V. Kioupi, N. Petrou, I. Souliotis, and C. Vaghela et al. (2022) “Systems Thinking as a Paradigm Shift for Sustainability Transformation”, Global Environmental Change 75, 102544, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102544
  86. Weber, O., and S. Remer (eds) (2014) Social Banks and the Future of Sustainable Finance. London and New York: Routledge.
  87. Weber, K. M., and H. Rohracher (2012) “Legitimizing Research, Technology and Innovation Policies for Transformative Change: Combining Insights from Innovation Systems and Multi-level Perspective in a Comprehensive ‘Failures’ Framework”, Research Policy 41.6, 1037–1047, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015
  88. Woolthuis, R. K., M. Lankhuizen, and V. Gilsing (2005) “A System Failure Framework for Innovation Policy Design”, Technovation 25.6, 609–619, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002
  89. Yan, S., F. Ferraro, and J. Almandoz (2019) “The Rise of Socially Responsible Investment Funds: The Paradoxical Role of the Financial Logic”, Adm. Sci. Q. 64, 466–501, https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839218773324

Export Metadata

UK registered social enterprise and Community Interest Company (CIC).

Company registration 14549556

Metadata

  • By book
  • By publisher
  • GraphQL API
  • Export API

Resources

  • Downloads
  • Videos
  • Merch
  • Presentations
  • Service status

Contact

  • Email
  • Bluesky
  • Mastodon
  • Github

Copyright © 2026 Thoth Open Metadata. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.