Skip to main content
Login
  1. Home
  2. Uncovering European Private Law
  3. 3. Negative Integration, European Private Law, and the Government’s Role in the Marketplace
Open Book Publishers

3. Negative Integration, European Private Law, and the Government’s Role in the Marketplace

  • Jaap Baaij (author)
Chapter of: Uncovering European Private Law: A Student Handbook(pp. 45–64)
  • Export Metadata
  • Metadata
  • Locations
  • Contributors
  • References

Export Metadata

Metadata
Title3. Negative Integration, European Private Law, and the Government’s Role in the Marketplace
ContributorJaap Baaij (author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0448.03
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0448/chapters/10.11647/obp.0448.03
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
CopyrightJaap Baaij;
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2025-06-05
Long abstract

On the surface, the deregulatory character of Europe’s initial use of negative legal integration in the 1950s appears to have little bearing on today’s positive integration of consumer rights protection through European private law (EPL). This chapter argues to the contrary. On closer inspection, EPL is cut from the same political cloth as negative European integration. The reason is that both negative and positive legal integration permit the use of contract law as a tool of private market regulation for the sake of societal wealth maximisation. The chapter concludes, therefore, that describing, supporting, or criticising the current state or trajectory of EPL should consider these utilitarian underpinnings related to the government’s regulatory role in the marketplace.

Page rangepp. 45–64
Print length20 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Locations
Landing PageFull text URLPlatform
PDFhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0448/chapters/10.11647/obp.0448.03Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0448.03.pdfFull text URL
HTMLhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0448/chapters/10.11647/obp.0448.03Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0448/ch3.xhtmlFull text URLPublisher Website
Contributors

Jaap Baaij

(author)
Associate Professor at Utrecht University

Dr. Jaap Baaij is an Associate Professor at the Montaigne Centre for Rule of Law

and Administration of Justice and the Molengraaff Institute for Private Law of the

University of Utrecht. His interdisciplinary research concentrates on the state’s

utilisation of contract law and civil procedural law to advance—or curb—privatemarket

lawmaking through alternative dispute resolution. At this interface of public

and private governance, he combines doctrinal analyses with empirical research,

political theory, language philosophy, and comparative law to take on themes related

to contract interpretation, cross-border commercial transactions and arbitration,

corporate social responsibility, and transnational legal theory. He obtained his Ph.D.

cum laude at the University of Amsterdam, at the Centre for the Study of European

Contract Law (CSECL), the predecessor of ACT. He also obtained a J.D. from Yale Law

School. See https://www.uu.nl/staff/CJWBaaij

References
  1. Armstrong, K. A., ‘Governing Goods: Content and Context’, in A. Arnull and D. Chalmers (eds), The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law, 1st edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 508–536, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199672646.001.0001
  2. Azoulai, L., ‘The Complex Weave of Harmonisation’, in A. Arnull and D. Chalmers (eds), The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law, 1st edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 589–611, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199672646.001.0001
  3. Bagchi, A., ‘Distributive Justice and Contract’, in G. Klass et al. (eds), Philosophical Foundations of Contract Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014), pp. 193–212, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198713012.001.0001
  4. Bagchi, A., ‘Distributive Injustice and Private Law’, Hastings Law Journal 60 (2008), 105–149
  5. Benson, P., Justice in Transactions: A Theory of Contract Law (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2019), https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2524z3h.13
  6. Barnett, R. E., ‘A Consent Theory of Contract’, Columbia Law Review 86 (1986), 269–321 (pp. 277–278), doi:10.2307/1122705
  7. Barnard, C., ‘The Construction of the Internal Market’, in D. M. Patterson and A. Södersten (eds), A Companion to European Union Law and International Law (Malden: Wiley Blackwell, 2016), pp. 195–204.
  8. Blauberger, M., ‘From Negative to Positive Integration: European State Aid Control Through Soft and Hard Law’, MPIfG Discussion Paper 08.4 (2008), https://ssrn.com/abstract=1660981
  9. Bix, B., Contract Law. Rules, Theory, and Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139024877
  10. Commission Communication, ‘Better Governance of the Single Market’, COM (2012) 259 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2012:0259:FIN:EN:PDF
  11. Commission Communication, ‘Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on European Contract Law’, COM (2001) 398 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2001:0398:FIN:EN:PDF,
  12. Commission Communication, ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council—A More Coherent European Contract Law—An Action Plan’, COM (2003) 68 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=oj:JOC_2003_063_R_0001_01
  13. Commission Communication, ‘GREEN PAPER FROM THE COMMISSION: On Policy Options for Progress Towards a European Contract Law for Consumers and Businesses’, COM (2010) 348 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0348:FIN:en:PDF
  14. Commission Communication, ‘A New Deal for Consumers (Green Paper)’, COM (2018) 138 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52018DC0183
  15. Commission Communication, ‘Single Market Act II Together for New Growth’, COM (2012) 573 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52012DC0573
  16. Commission Communication, ‘Towards a Single Market Act for a Highly Competitive Social Market Economy 50 Proposals for Improving our Work, Business and Exchanges with One Another’, COM (2010) 609 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52010DC0608
  17. Comparato, G., H.-W. Micklitz, and Y. Svetiev, ‘The Regulatory Character of European Private Law’, in C. Twigg-Flesner (ed.), Research Handbook on EU Consumer and Contract Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016), pp. 35–67, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782547372.00009
  18. Dagan, H., and M. Heller, The Choice Theory of Contracts (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017), https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316477045
  19. Fuller, L. L., ‘Considerations and Form’, Columbia Law Review 41 (1941), 799–824, https://doi.org/10.2307/1117840
  20. Hartkamp, A., et al. (eds), Cases, Materials, and Text on European Law and Private Law (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2017).
  21. Hesselink, M. W., ‘Contract Theory in EU Contract Law’, in C. Twigg-Flesner (ed.), Research Handbook on EU Consumer and Contract Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016), pp. 508–534, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782547372.00031
  22. Johnston, A., EC Regulation of Corporate Governance (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2009), https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770753
  23. Kronman, A. T., ‘Wealth Maximization as a Normative Principle’, The Journal of Legal Studies 9 (1980), 227–229, https://doi.org/10.1086/467637
  24. Maduro, M. P., and P. C. Sousa, ‘The Free Movement of Goods’, in D. M. Patterson and A. Södersten (eds), A Companion to European Union Law and International Law (Malden: Wiley Blackwell 2016), pp. 205–216
  25. Majone, G., Dilemmas of European Integration: The Ambiguities and Pitfalls of Integration by Stealth (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), https://doi.org/10.1093/0199274304.001.0001
  26. Mak, C., ‘Free Movement and Contract Law’, in C. Twigg-Flesner (ed.), Research Handbook on EU Consumer and Contract Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016), pp. 182–196, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782547372.00015
  27. Markovits, D., ‘Making and Keeping Contracts’, Virginia Law Review 92 (2006), 1325–1332
  28. Micklitz, H.-W., ‘On the Intellectual History of Freedom of Contract and Regulation’, Penn State Journal of Law and International Affairs 4 (2015), 1–32
  29. Oman, N. B., ‘The Failure of Economic Interpretations of the Law of Contract Damages’, Washington and Lee Law Review 64 (2007), pp. 829–875
  30. Pinder, J., ‘Positive Integration and Negative Integration: Some Problems of Economic Union in the EEC’, World Today 24 (1968), 88–110
  31. Posner, R. A., ‘The Ethical and Political Basis of the Efficiency Norm in Common Law Adjudication’, Hofstra Law Review 8 (1980), 487–507
  32. Posner, R. A., ‘Utilitarianism, Economics, and Legal Theory’, The Journal of Legal Studies 8 (1979), 103–140
  33. Raz, J., The Morality of Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988), https://doi.org/10.1093/0198248075.001.0001
  34. Rosenfeld, M., ‘Contract and Justice: The Relation between Classical Contract Law and Social Contract Theory’, Iowa Law Review 70 (1985), 769–900
  35. Scharpf, F. W., ‘Balancing Positive and Negative Integration: The Regulatory Options for Europe’, MPIfG Working Paper 97.8 (1997), http://hdl.handle.net/10419/41672
  36. Scharpf, F. W., Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).
  37. Scharpf, F. W., ‘Negative and Positive Integration in the Political Economy of European Welfare State’, in M. G. Marks, F. W. Scharpf, P. C. Schmitter, and W. Streeck (eds), Governance in the European Union (London: SAGE Publications, 1996), pp. 15–39, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446279328.n2
  38. Schütze, R., European Union Law, 2nd edn (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 2018), https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108555913
  39. Schwartz, A., and R. E. Scott, ‘Contract Theory and the Limits of Contract Law’, Yale Law Review 113 (2003), 541–619, https://doi.org/10.2307/3657531
  40. Smith, A. S., Contract Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004)
  41. Spaventa, E., ‘The Free Movement of Workers in the Twenty-first Century’, in A. Arnull and D. Chalmers (eds), The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law, 1st edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 456–476, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199672646.013.20
  42. Tinbergen, J., International Economic Integration, 2nd edn (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1954)
  43. Unberatth, H., and A. Johnston, ‘The Double-Headed Approach of the ECJ Concerning Consumer Protection’, Common Market Law Review 44.5 (2007), 1237–1284
  44. Walker, N., ‘The Philosophy of European Union Law’, in A. Arnull and D. Chalmers (eds), The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law, 1st edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 3–27, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199672646.013.2
  45. Weatherill, S., The Internal Market as a Legal Concept, 1st edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017), https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198794806.001.0001
  46. Weinrib, E. J., ‘Corrective Justice in a Nutshell’, The University of Toronto Law Journal 52 (2002), 349–356
  47. Zipursky, B. C., ‘Philosophy of Private Law’, in J. L. Colman et al. (eds), The Oxford University Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 623–630, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270972.013.0016

Export Metadata

UK registered social enterprise and Community Interest Company (CIC).

Company registration 14549556

Metadata

  • By book
  • By publisher
  • GraphQL API
  • Export API

Resources

  • Downloads
  • Videos
  • Merch
  • Presentations
  • Service status

Contact

  • Email
  • Bluesky
  • Mastodon
  • Github

Copyright © 2026 Thoth Open Metadata. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.