Skip to main content
Login
  1. Home
  2. Uncovering European Private Law
  3. 9. Consumers in European Private Law
Open Book Publishers

9. Consumers in European Private Law

  • Joasia Luzak(author)
Chapter of: Uncovering European Private Law: A Student Handbook(pp. 171–190)
  • Export Metadata
  • Metadata
  • Locations
  • Contributors
  • References

Export Metadata

Metadata
Title9. Consumers in European Private Law
ContributorJoasia Luzak(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0448.09
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0448/chapters/10.11647/obp.0448.09
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
CopyrightJoasia Luzak;
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2025-06-05
Long abstract

This is an introduction for future students of (European) consumer law to its main concepts, such as average and vulnerable consumers, unfairness, and product risks. Upon reading you may expect to start being able to place this research area within the legal architecture of European private law. You are encouraged to think about the impact of selected issues on consumer protection, including such issues as consumer apathy in enforcing rights, digitalisation, and climate change. Throughout, you are given points for reflection to encourage further reading and help with understanding the content.

Page rangepp. 171–190
Print length20 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Locations
Landing PageFull text URLPlatform
PDFhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0448/chapters/10.11647/obp.0448.09Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0448.09.pdfFull text URL
HTMLhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0448/chapters/10.11647/obp.0448.09Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0448/ch9.xhtmlFull text URLPublisher Website
Contributors

Joasia Luzak

(author)
Professor of Private Law at University of Exeter
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3524-7340

Prof. Dr. Joasia Luzak is Professor of Private Law, the Director of the Centre for

European Legal Studies (CELS), and Director of Global Engagement for the Law School

of the University of Exeter. She is also a Guest Associate Professor at the Amsterdam

Centre for Transformative Private Law (ACT) at the University of Amsterdam. At

this university, as of 2015, she was a Deputy Director of the Centre for the Study of

European Contract Law (predecessor of ACT), as well as the Director of the European

Private Law LL.M. program. Her research interests include European consumer law,

contract law, and law on internet and digital markets. See https://experts.exeter.

ac.uk/25252-joasia-luzak

References
  1. Bar-Gill, O., Seduction by Contract (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012), https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199663361.001.0001
  2. Ben-Shahar, O., and O. Bar-Gill, ‘Regulatory Techniques in Consumer Protection: A Critique of European Consumer Contract Law’, Common Market Law Review 50 (2013), 109–126, https://doi-org.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.54648/cola2013039
  3. Ben-Shahar, O., and C. E. Schneider, More Than You Wanted to Know (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2014)
  4. Benöhr, I., ‘Consumer Dispute Resolution after The Lisbon Treaty: Collective Actions and Alternative Procedures’, Journal of Consumer Policy 36 (2013), 87–110, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-012-9202-0
  5. BEUC, ‘Why the EU Needs to Improve Its Product Safety Law’, BEUC (26 August 2020)
  6. Bol, N., et al., ‘Vulnerability in a Tracked Society: Combining Tracking and Survey Data to Understand who gets Targeted with what Content’, New Media and Society 22 (2020), 1996–2017, https://doi-org.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/1461444820924631
  7. CLICKON, ‘How Crucial is a Consumer’s Self-Concept in Advertising’, CLICKON (13 August 2019), https://news.clickon.co/how-crucial-is-a-consumers-self-concept-in-advertising
  8. Commission Communication, ‘Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL’, COM (2022) 143 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52022PC0143
  9. Duivenvoorde, B., The Consumer Benchmarks in the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (Cham: Springer, 2015), https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-319–13924–1
  10. Duivenvoorde, B., ‘The Upcoming Changes in the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive: A Better Deal for Consumers?’, Journal of European Common Market Law 6 (2019), 219–228
  11. European Commission, ‘A European Green Deal’, European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/european-green-deal_en
  12. European Commission, ‘Screening of Websites for “Greenwashing”: Half of Green Claims Lack Evidence’, European Commission (28 January 2021) https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_269
  13. European Council, ‘Digital Single Market for Europe’, European Council, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/digital-single-market/
  14. Fineman, M. A., ‘The Vulnerable Subject: Anchoring Equality in the Human Condition’, Yale Journal of Law and Feminism 20 (2008), 1–23
  15. Frenken, K., and J. Schor, ‘Putting the Sharing Economy into Perspective’, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 23 (2017), 3–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.01.003
  16. Fritze, M. P., et al., ‘From Goods to Services Consumption: A Social Network Analysis on Sharing Economy and Servitization Research’, Journal of Service Management Research 2 (2018), 3–16, http://10.15358/2511-8676-2018-3-3
  17. Furnell, S., and A. Phippen, ‘Online Privacy: A Matter of Policy’, Computer Fraud and Security 8 (2012), 12–18, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-3723(12)70083-0
  18. Helberger, N., et al., ‘EU Consumer Protection 2.0. Structural Asymmetries in Digital Consumer Markets’, BEUC Study (March 2021), https://www.beuc.eu/sites/default/files/publications/beuc-x-2021-018_eu_consumer_protection_2.0.pdf
  19. Helleringer, G., and A.-L. Sibony, ‘European Consumer Protection through the Behavorial Lens’, The Columbia Journal of European Law 23 (2017), 607–646
  20. Hodges, C., ‘Mass Collective Redress: Consumer ADR and Regulatory Techniques’, European Review of Private Law 5 (2015), 829–874, https://doi-org.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.54648/erpl2015050
  21. Hodges, C., and S. Voet, Delivering Collective Redress: New Technologies (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2018)
  22. Howells, G., ‘The Relationship between Product Liability and Product Safety—Understanding a Necessary Element in European Product Liability through a Comparison with the US Position’, Washburn Law Journal 39 (2000), 305–346
  23. Howells, G., H.-W. Micklitz and T. Wilhelmsson, ‘Towards a Better Understanding of Unfair Commercial Practices’, International Journal of Law and Management 51 (2009), 69–90, https://doi-org.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.1108/17542430910947103
  24. Kessler, F., ‘Contracts of Adhesion: Some Thoughts about Freedom of Contract’, Columbia Law Review 43 (1943), 629–642
  25. Lessig, L., Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy (London: Penguin, 2008)
  26. Loos, M., ‘Art. 70–71: Incorporation and Making Available of Standard Contract Terms’, in A. Colombi Ciacchi (ed.), Contents and Effects of Contracts—Lessons to Learn from the Common European Sales Law (Cham: Springer, 2016), pp. 179–202, https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-319–28074–5
  27. Loos, M., and J. Luzak, ‘Wanted: A Bigger Stick. On Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts with Online Service Providers’, Journal of Consumer Policy 2016.1 (2016), 63–90, https://doi-org.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/s10603-015-9303-7
  28. Luth, H., Behavioural Economics in Consumer Policy (Brussels: Intersentia, 2010)
  29. Luzak, J., ‘The ADR Directive: Designed to Fail? A Hole-Ridden Stairway to Consumer Justice’, European Review of Private Law 24.1 (2016), 81–101, https://doi-org.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.54648/erpl2016005
  30. Luzak, J., ‘A Broken Notion: Impact of Modern Technologies on Product Liability’, European Journal of Risk Regulation 11.3 (2020), 630–649, https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2020.13
  31. Luzak, J., ‘Protecting Consumers against Their Poison: Defects in Digital Content and Digital Services’, in S. Martinelli, C. Poncibo, and P. Perri (eds.), EU Product Liability: Platforms, Internet of Things, and Artificial Intelligence (Routledge, 2025, forthcoming)
  32. Luzak, J., ‘The Steady Creep of an Average Consumer as a Reference Consumer in the Assessment of the Transparent Provision of Mandatory Information’, Tijdschrift voor Consumentenrecht en handelspraktijken 5 (2020), 265–274
  33. Luzak, J., ‘Vulnerable Travellers in the Digital Age’, Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 3 (2016), 130–135
  34. Luzak, J., ‘Who Calls the Tune? Stock Taking of Behavioural Consumer Protection in Europe’, in H.-W. Micklitz, A.-L. Sibony, and F. Esposito (eds), Research Methods in Consumer Law (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018), pp. 239–275, https://doi-org.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.4337/9781785366611.00013
  35. Luzak, J., and M. Junuzović, ‘Blurred Lines: Between Formal and Substantive Transparency in Consumer Credit Contracts’, Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 8 (2019), 97–107
  36. Mak, V., ‘The Myth of the “Empowered Consumer”—Lessons from Financial Literacy Studies’, Zeitschrift für Europäisches Unternehmens- und Verbraucherrecht (euvr) 1 (2012), 254–263
  37. Mak, V., ‘Standards of Protection: In Search of the ‘Average Consumer’ of EU Law in the Proposal for a Consumer Rights Directive’, European Review of Private Law 19.1 (2011), 25–42, https://doi-org.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.54648/erpl2011003
  38. Mak, V., and E. Terryn, ‘Circular Economy and Consumer Protection: The Consumer as a Citizen and the Limits of Empowerment Through Consumer Law’, Journal of Consumer Policy 43 (2020), 227–248, https://doi-org.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/s10603-019-09435-y
  39. McDonald, A. M., and L. F. Cranor, ‘The Cost of Reading Privacy Policies’, A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society 4 (2008), 540–565
  40. Micklitz, H.-W., and N. Reich, ‘AGB-Recht und UWG—(endlich) ein Ende des Kästchendenkens nach Pereničova und Invitel?’, Europäisches Wirtschafts- und Steuerrecht 23 (2012), 257–264
  41. Micklitz, H.-W., and G. Saumier, Enforcement and Effectiveness of Consumer Law (Cham: Springer, 2018), https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-319–78431–1
  42. Ní Choisdealbha, A., and P. D. Lunn, ‘Green and Simple: Disclosures on Eco-labels Interact with Situational Constraints in Consumer Choice’, Journal of Consumer Policy 43 (2020), 699–722, https://doi-org.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/s10603-020-09465-x
  43. Norwegian Consumer Council, ‘You Can Log Out, But You Can Never Leave’, Forbrukerraadet (14 January 2021), https://storage02.forbrukerradet.no/media/2021/01/2021-01-14-you-can-log-out-but-you-can-never-leave-final.pdf
  44. Pavillon, C., ‘Private Enforcement as a Deterrence Tool: A Blind Spot in the Omnibus-Directive’, European Review of Private Law 27 (2019), 2397–1328, https://doi-org.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.54648/erpl2019072
  45. Rossi, A., et al., ‘When Design Met Law: Design Patterns for Information Transparency’, Droit de la consummation 122 (2019), 79–121
  46. Roth, W.-H., ‘Transposing ‘Pointillist’ EC Guidelines into Systematic National Codes—Problems and Consequences’, European Review of Private Law 6 (2002), 761–776, https://doi-org.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.54648/5114788
  47. Schebesta, H., and K. Purnhagen, ‘Island or Ocean: Empirical Evidence on the Average Consumer Concept in the UCPD’, European Review of Private Law 28.2 (2020), 293–310, https://doi-org.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.54648/erpl2020015
  48. Seizov, O., A. J. Wulf, and J. Luzak, ‘The Transparent Trap: A Multidisciplinary Perspective on the Design of Transparent Online Disclosures in the EU’, Journal of Consumer Policy 42 (2019), 149–173, https://doi-org.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/s10603-018-9393-0
  49. Straetmans, G., Information Obligations and Disinformation of Consumers (Cham: Springer, 2019), https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3-030–18054–6
  50. Straetmans, G., ‘Misleading Practices, the Consumer Information Model and Consumer Protection’, Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 5 (2016), 199–210
  51. Steennot, R., ‘Public and Private Enforcement in the Field of Unfair Contract Terms’, European Review of Private Law 23 (2015), 589–614, https://doi-org.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.54648/erpl2015039
  52. Sunstein, C., Free Markets and Social Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press 1997), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195102727.001.0001
  53. Talesh, S., ‘How Dispute Resolution System Design Matters: An Organizational Analysis of Dispute Resolution Structures and Consumer Lemon Laws’, Law and Society Review 46 (2012), 463–496, https://doi-org.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00503.x
  54. Terryn, E., ‘Consumers, by Definition, Include Us All… But Not for Every Transaction’, European Review of Private Law 24 (2016), 271–286, https://doi-org.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.54648/erpl2016017
  55. Terryn, E., ‘A Right to Repair? Towards Sustainable Remedies in Consumer Law’, European Review of Private Law 27 (2019), 851–873, https://doi-org.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.54648/erpl2019044
  56. Twigg-Flesner, C., ‘Guiding Principles for Updating the Product Liability Directive for the Digital Age’, ELI Innovation Paper Series (January 2021), https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract=3770796
  57. Ullrich, C., ‘New Approach Meets New Economy: Enforcing EU Product Safety in E-Commerce’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 26 (2019), 558–584, https://doi-org.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.1177/1023263X1985
  58. UNCTAD, ‘How Covid-19 Triggered the Digital and E-Commerce Turning Point’, UNCTAD (15 March 2021), https://unctad.org/news/how-covid-19-triggered-digital-and-e-commerce-turning-point
  59. Van den Bergh, R., ‘Should Consumer Protection Law Be Publicly Enforced?’, in W. van Boom and M. Loos (eds), Collective Enforcement of Consumer Law (Groningen: Europe Law Publishing, 2007), pp. 179–203
  60. Van Duin, J. M. L., and C. Leone, ‘The Real (New) Deal: Levelling the Odds for Consumer-Litigants: On the Need for Modernization. Part II’, European Review of Private Law 27 (2019), 1227–1250, https://doi-org.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.54648/erpl2019069
  61. Vries, S. de, ‘Consumer Protection and the EU Single Market Rules—The Search for the “Paradigm Consumer”’, Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 4 (2012), 228–242
  62. Wagner, W., and W. Walker, Incomprehensible! (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2019), https://doi-org.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.1017/9781139051774
  63. Weber, F., ‘Is ADR the Superior Mechanism for Consumer Contractual Disputes?—an Assessment of Incentivizing Effects of the ADR Directive’, Journal of Consumer Policy 38 (2015), 265–285, https://doi-org.uoelibrary.idm.oclc.org/10.1007/s10603-015-9291-7

Export Metadata

UK registered social enterprise and Community Interest Company (CIC).

Company registration 14549556

Metadata

  • By book
  • By publisher
  • GraphQL API
  • Export API

Resources

  • Downloads
  • Videos
  • Merch
  • Presentations
  • Service status

Contact

  • Email
  • Bluesky
  • Mastodon
  • Github

Copyright © 2026 Thoth Open Metadata. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.