Skip to main content
Login
  1. Home
  2. Uncovering European Private Law
  3. 4. Positive Integration: Harmonisation of National Law through Directives and Regulations
Open Book Publishers

4. Positive Integration: Harmonisation of National Law through Directives and Regulations

  • Marco Loos(author)
Chapter of: Uncovering European Private Law: A Student Handbook(pp. 65–88)
  • Export Metadata
  • Metadata
  • Locations
  • Contributors
  • References

Export Metadata

Metadata
Title4. Positive Integration
SubtitleHarmonisation of National Law through Directives and Regulations
ContributorMarco Loos(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0448.04
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0448/chapters/10.11647/obp.0448.04
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
CopyrightMarco B. M. Loos;
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2025-06-05
Long abstract

This chapter discusses ‘positive integration’ (i.e. the EU promulgating legislation in the form of directives and regulations to create a common market for its Member States) and its impact on the national private laws of EU Member States. The chapter discusses the differences between regulations and directives, highlighting advantages and disadvantages of both. Whilst regulations and so-called ‘maximum harmonisation’ directives seem to harmonise the laws of the Member States, they can be difficult to fit into the national legal system, threatening the latter’s coherence. Minimum harmonisation directives, on the other hand, seem easier to fit in, but in practice this is not always the case.

Furthermore, it is questioned whether positive integration is actually helping to create an internal market—other factors, such as language or physical distance might be bigger obstacles than different legal regimes. At the same time, an online market is emerging, and the EU has perhaps a better case for harmonisation of private law applying there. The chapter also touches upon other pressing questions, including: should only consumers be protected as weaker parties or should small business be regarded as in need of special protection as well? And should the EU maintain its focus on sales or also harmonise service contract law, especially in light of the call for a more sustainable private law and the upcoming servitisation?

Page rangepp. 65–88
Print length24 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Locations
Landing PageFull text URLPlatform
PDFhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0448/chapters/10.11647/obp.0448.04Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0448.04.pdfFull text URL
HTMLhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0448/chapters/10.11647/obp.0448.04Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0448/ch4.xhtmlFull text URLPublisher Website
Contributors

Marco Loos

(author)
Professor of Private Law at University of Amsterdam
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1374-4661

Prof. Dr. Marco B. M. Loos is Professor of Private Law, in particular of European

consumer law, at the Amsterdam Law School and ACT. He studied Law at the

University of Amsterdam (1987–1993) and subsequently wrote his Ph.D. thesis at

Utrecht University (1993–1998). From 1997 to 2001 he worked as a lecturer at Tilburg

University. He has worked at the University of Amsterdam since 2002, and since 2005

as a Full Professor. In addition, he currently is a member of the Board of Governors

of the Consumentenbond (since 2015) and of the Stichting Voortgezet Onderwijs

Amsterdam-Zuid (a combination of three schools of secondary education in

Amsterdam, since 2021), and of the Stichting toetsing verzekeraars (since 2022; from

2018–2022 he was a member of the Stichting’s Board). Furthermore, he is a member of

the Dutch Social-Economic Council’s Commission on Consumer Affairs (Commissie

voor Consumenten-aangelegenheden, Sociaal-Economische Raad, since 2022) and of

the Board of the Ius Commune Research School (since 2023, third term). He is also

a Deputy Judge at the Court of Appeal of ’s Hertogenbosch (since 2015). Previously,

he has been a member of several bodies for alternative dispute resolution. Loos

specialises in European and Dutch contract law and European and Dutch consumer

law. He publishes regularly on subjects of European consumer law, including standard

contract terms, digital content, consumer sales, and enforcement of consumer law. See

https://www.uva.nl/profiel/l/o/m.b.m.loos/m.b.m.loos.html

References
  1. Artz, M., ‘Die “vollständige Harmonisierung” des Europäischen Verbraucherprivatrechts’, Zeitschrift für Gemeinschaftsprivatrecht 6.4 (2009), 171–177
  2. Barendrecht, M., et al., Principles of European Law on Service Contracts (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007)
  3. Bonell, M. J., ‘The CISG, European Contract Law and the Development of a World Contract Law’, American Journal of Comparative Law 56 (2008), 1–28, https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2007.0001
  4. Commission Communication, ‘GREEN PAPER on the Review of the Consumer Aquis’, COM (2006) 744 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2006:0744:FIN:en:PDF
  5. Commission Communication, ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Certain Aspects Concerning Contracts for the Online and Other Distance Sales of Goods’, COM (2015) 635 final, https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/HIS/?uri=celex:52015PC0635
  6. European Commission, ‘July Infringement Package: Key Decisions’, European Commission (2 July 2022), https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/INF_20_1212
  7. European Commission, ‘A Services Economy that Works for Europeans: Questions and Answers’, European Commission (10 January 2017), https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_17_11
  8. Faure, M., ‘Towards a Maximum Harmonization of Consumer Contract Law?’, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 15 (2008), 433–445, https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263x0801500401
  9. Giliker, P., ‘The Draft Common Frame of Reference and European Contract Law: Moving from the “Academic” to the “Political”’, in J. Devenney and M. Kenny (eds), The Transformation of European Private Law (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 23–44, https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139870559.004
  10. Gsell, B., and H. M. Schellhase, ‘Vollharmonisiertes Verbraucherkreditrecht—ein Vorbild für die weitere europäische Angleichung des Verbrauchervertragsrechts?’, JuristenZeitung 64 (2009), 20–29
  11. Hondius, E. H., ‘The Proposal for a European Directive on Consumer Rights: A Step Forward’, European Review of Private Law 18 (2010), 103–127, https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2010005
  12. Klijnsma, J. G., Contract Law as Fairness. A Rawlsian Perspective on the Position of SMEs in European Contract Law (doctoral thesis, University of Amsterdam, 2014), https://pure.uva.nl/ws/files/2071551/142288_thesis.pdf
  13. Loos, M. B. M., ‘Full Harmonisation as a Regulatory Concept and its Consequences for the National Legal Orders. The Example of the Consumer Rights Directive‘, in M. Stürner (ed.), Vollharmonisierung im Europäischen Verbraucherrecht? (Munich: Sellier European Law Publisher, 2010), pp. 47–98
  14. Loos, M. B. M., ‘Not Good but Certainly Content. The Proposals for European Harmonisation of Online and Distance Selling of Goods and the Supply of Digital Content’, in I. Claeys and E. Terryn (eds), Digital Contents & Distance Sales. New Developments at EU Level (Cambridge, UK: Intersentia, 2017), pp. 3–53, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780686035.002
  15. Loos, M. B. M., ‘One Day I’ll Fly Away… Voucher Schemes for Cancelled Package Travel Contracts After the Outbreak of the Covid-19 Pandemic’, Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 10 (2021), 122–124
  16. Loos, M. B. M., ‘Service Contracts’, in A. S. Hartkamp et al. (eds), Towards a European Civil Code, 4th edn (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2010), pp. 757–785
  17. Low, G., ‘The (Ir)relevance of Harmonization and Legal Diversity to European Contract Law: A Perspective from Psychology’, European Review of Private Law 18 (2010), 285–305, https://doi.org/10.54648/erpl2010018
  18. Mak, V., and E. Terryn, ‘Circular Economy and Consumer Protection: The Consumer as a Citizen and the Limits of Empowerment through Consumer Law’, Journal of Consumer Policy 43 (2020), 227–248, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-019-09435-y
  19. Micklitz, H.-W., ‘The Targeted Full Harmonisation Approach: Looking Behind the Curtain’, in G. Howells and R. Schulze (eds), Modernising and Harmonising Consumer Contract Law (Munich: Sellier European Law Publisher 2009), pp. 47–86, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783866538603.2.47
  20. Osiejewicz, J., ‘The Opt-out-Clause of Article 114 TFEU: Remarks on the Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2013—Republic of Poland v. European Commission (CaseT-370/11)’, Studia IURIDICA AUCTORITATE Universitatis Pecs PUBLICATA 154 (2016), 161–177
  21. Reich, N., ‘Von der Minimal- zur Voll- zur “Halbharmonisierung”. Ein europäisches Privatrechtsdrama in fünf Akten’, Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht 1 (2010), 7–39
  22. Rott, P. ‘Minimum Harmonization for the Completion of the Internal Market? The Example of Consumer Sales Law’, Common Market Law Review 50 (2003), 1107–1135, https://doi.org/10.54648/cola2003053
  23. Schauer, M., ‘Contract Law of the Services Directive’, European Review of Contract Law 4 (2008), 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1515/ercl.4.1.1
  24. Sieburgh, C. H., Mr. C. Assers Handleiding tot de beoefening van het Nederlands Burgerlijk Recht. 6. Verbintenissenrecht. Deel IV. De verbintenis uit de wet, 15th edn (Deventer: Wolters Kluwer, 2019)
  25. Twigg-Flesner, C., European Union Private Law (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2010), https://doi.org/10.1017/cco9780511777714
  26. Ulfbeck, V., and O. Hansen, ‘Sustainability Clauses in an Unsustainable Contract Law?’, European Review of Contract Law 16 (2020), 186–205, https://doi.org/10.1515/ercl-2020-0010
  27. von Bar, Chr., et al. (eds), Principles, Definitions and Model Rules of European Private Law. Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR) (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), https://doi.org/10.1515/9783866537279.131
  28. Wilhelmsson, T., ‘The Abuse of the ‘‘Confident Consumer’’ as a Justification for EC Consumer Law’, Journal of Consumer Policy 27 (2004), 317–337, https://doi.org/10.1023/b:copo.0000040517.34781.7d

Export Metadata

UK registered social enterprise and Community Interest Company (CIC).

Company registration 14549556

Metadata

  • By book
  • By publisher
  • GraphQL API
  • Export API

Resources

  • Downloads
  • Videos
  • Merch
  • Presentations
  • Service status

Contact

  • Email
  • Bluesky
  • Mastodon
  • Github

Copyright © 2026 Thoth Open Metadata. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.