The Oslo Accords and the Amici Curiae Proceedings before the ICC: The Findings of the ICJ Advisory Opinion

Mohamed M. El Zeidy (author)

Export Metadata

Raw

Metadata
Title	The Oslo Accords and the Amici Curiae Proceedings before the ICC
Subtitle	The Findings of the ICJ Advisory Opinion
Contributor	Mohamed M. El Zeidy (author)
DOI	https://doi.org/10.59704/399ba3adad41768f
Landing page	https://verfassungsblog.de/the-findings-of-the-icj-advisory-opinion-on-the-oslo-accords-and-the-amici-curiae-proceedings-before-the-icc-in-the-situation-of-palestine/
License	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Publisher	Verfassungsblog
Published on	2025-09-09
Long abstract	This article focuses on the legal findings of the ICJ concerning the Oslo II Accord, and argues in favour of its relevance in deciding the jurisdictional question raised by the UK before the International Criminal Court (ICC). It also addresses whether invoking this question through a procedure of an amicus curiae during the warrant of arrest stage fits neatly within the ICC’s procedural regime, and it concludes that it does not.
Language	English (Original)

This article focuses on the legal findings of the ICJ concerning the Oslo II Accord, and argues in favour of its relevance in deciding the jurisdictional question raised by the UK before the International Criminal Court (ICC). It also addresses whether invoking this question through a procedure of an amicus curiae during the warrant of arrest stage fits neatly within the ICC’s procedural regime, and it concludes that it does not.