| Title | On productivism |
|---|---|
| Contributor | Dani Rodrik (author) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.31389/lsepress.tlc.c |
| Landing page | https://doi.org/10.31389/lsepress.tlc.c |
| License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
| Copyright | Author(s) |
| Publisher | LSE Press |
| Published on | 2025-10-16 |
| Short abstract | ‘Productivism’ refers to an approach that prioritises the dissemination of productive economic opportunities throughout the entire economy and segments of the labour force. It differs from what has come to be called ‘neoliberalism’ by assigning governments and civil society significant roles in achieving this goal. Productivism puts less faith in markets and is suspicious of large corporations. It emphasises production and investment over finance and the revitalisation of local communities over globalisation. It also departs from the Keynesian welfare state by focusing less on redistribution, social transfers, and macroeconomic management, and more on creating economic opportunity by working on the supply side of the economy to create good, productive jobs for everyone. This chapter relates the contemporary labour market problems of advanced economies to the dualism literature in economic development, which focuses on the divergence between ‘modern’ and ‘traditional’ segments within poor economies. It then highlights the nature of the new challenges and why established models of economic growth and Keynesian social welfare need to be updated. It describes new modes of industrial policy required to deal with these challenges and questions whether our governments are up to it. It also discusses how the elements of this new strategy are drawing support from both sides of the political spectrum. This chapter includes responses to Dani Rodrik by Jean Pisani-Ferry and Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas. |
| Long abstract | ‘Productivism’ refers to an approach that prioritises the dissemination of productive economic opportunities throughout the entire economy and segments of the labour force. It differs from what has come to be called ‘neoliberalism’ by assigning governments and civil society significant roles in achieving this goal. Productivism puts less faith in markets and is suspicious of large corporations. It emphasises production and investment over finance and the revitalisation of local communities over globalisation. It also departs from the Keynesian welfare state by focusing less on redistribution, social transfers, and macroeconomic management, and more on creating economic opportunity by working on the supply side of the economy to create good, productive jobs for everyone. This chapter relates the contemporary labour market problems of advanced economies to the dualism literature in economic development, which focuses on the divergence between ‘modern’ and ‘traditional’ segments within poor economies. It then highlights the nature of the new challenges and why established models of economic growth and Keynesian social welfare need to be updated. It describes new modes of industrial policy required to deal with these challenges and questions whether our governments are up to it. It also discusses how the elements of this new strategy are drawing support from both sides of the political spectrum. This chapter includes responses to Dani Rodrik by Jean Pisani-Ferry and Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas. |
| Language | English (Original) |
| THEMA |
|
| BISAC |
|
| LCC |
|
| Keywords |
|
Dani Rodrik is Ford Foundation Professor of International Political Economy at the HKS. He has published widely in the areas of economic development, international economics, and political economy. His current research focuses on employment and economic growth, in both developing and advanced economies. He is the recipient of numerous awards, including the inaugural Albert O. Hirschman Prize of the Social Science Research Council (SSRC) and the Princess of Asturias Award for Social Sciences. Rodrik is Co-Director of the Reimagining the Economy Program at the HKS ABOUT THE EDITORS AND CONTRIBUTORS xxxIII and of the Economics for Inclusive Prosperity network. He was President of the IEA during 2021–23 and helped found the IEA’s Women in Leadership in Economics initiative. His most recent books are Combating Inequality: Rethinking Government’s Role (2021, edited with Olivier Blanchard) and Straight Talk on Trade: Ideas for a Sane World Economy (2017). He is also the author of Economics Rules: The Rights and Wrongs of the Dismal Science (2015), The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy (2011) and One Economics, Many Recipes: Globalization, Institutions, and Economic Growth (2007).
Jean Pisani-Ferry is a Senior Fellow at Bruegel, the European think tank, and a Non-Resident Senior Fellow at the Peterson Institute (Washington, DC). He sits on the supervisory board of the French Caisse des Dépôts and serves as non-executive chair of I4CE, the French Institute for Climate Economics. He served from 2013 to 2016 as Commissioner-General of France Stratégie, the ideas lab of the French government.
Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas is the Economic Counsellor and the Director of Research of the IMF. He is on leave from UC, Berkeley where he is the S.K. and Angela Chan Professor of Global Management in the Department of Economics and at the Haas School of Business. He was the editor-in-chief of the IMF Economic Review from its creation in 2009 to 2016, the managing editor of the Journal of International Economics between 2017 and 2019, and a co-editor of the American Economic Review between 2019 and 2022. He is on leave from the National Bureau of Economic Research, where he was director of the International Finance and Macroeconomics programme, a Research Fellow with the Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) London and a Fellow of the Econometric Society. He is the laureate of the 2007 Bernácer Prize for best European economist working in macroeconomics and finance under the age of 40, and of the 2008 Prix du Meilleur Jeune Économiste for best French economist under the age of 40. He attended École Polytechnique and received his PhD in Economics in 1996 from MIT