Skip to main content
Login
  1. Home
  2. The Field Guide to Mixing Social and Biophysical Methods in Environmental Research
  3. 19. Engaging remote sensing and ethnography to seed alternative landscape stories and scripts
Open Book Publishers

Engaging remote sensing and ethnography to seed alternative landscape stories and scripts

  • Lisa C. Kelley(author)
Chapter of: The Field Guide to Mixing Social and Biophysical Methods in Environmental Research(pp. 377–402)
  • Export Metadata
  • Metadata
  • Locations
  • Contributors
  • References

Export Metadata

Metadata
Title Engaging remote sensing and ethnography to seed alternative landscape stories and scripts
ContributorLisa C. Kelley(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0418.19
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0418/chapters/10.11647/obp.0418.19
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
CopyrightLisa C. Kelley;
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2025-02-25
Long abstract

In this chapter, I draw on experiences studying land and labor transformations in Sulawesi, Indonesia to reflect on practices for integrating remotely sensed (RS) and ethnographic research methods in a critical physical geographical account of socio-environmental relations. I offer three suggestions for going beyond the existing emphasis on eliminating barriers to integration to foster more convivial, generative, and flexible approaches to joining RS and ethnography. The first emphasizes the importance of staying with place and process in developing ‘intuitive’ approaches to integration. The second highlights how attention to the tensions between RS and ethnographic findings can deepen knowledge reflexivity while nuancing or even upending existing research understandings. The third explores how integrative instincts can inform approaches to re-fashioning RS and ethnographic methods, whether this involves more explicitly spatializing ethnographic research or leveraging RS to develop an ethnographically “thick” description of place-based relations.

Page rangepp. 377–402
Print length26 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Locations
Landing PageFull text URLPlatform
PDFhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0418/chapters/10.11647/obp.0418.19Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0418.19.pdfFull text URL
HTMLhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0418/chapters/10.11647/obp.0418.19Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0418/ch19.xhtmlFull text URLPublisher Website
Contributors

Lisa C. Kelley

(author)
Assistant Professor of Geography and Environmental Sciences at University of Colorado Denver
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6638-4017
References
  1. Adey, P. 2010. Aerial Life: Spaces, Mobilities, Affects (John Wiley and Sons).
  2. Arce-Nazario, J.A. 2016. ‘Translating land-use science to a museum exhibit’, Journal of Land Use Science, 11, pp. 417–428.
  3. Archer, M. 2021. ‘Imagining impact in global supply chains: Data-driven sustainability and the production of surveillable space’, Surveillance and Society, 19, pp. 282–298.
  4. Belgiu, M. and L. Drăguţ. 2016. ‘Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions’, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 114, pp. 24–31.
  5. Bennett, M.M., J.K. Chen, L.F. Alvarez León, and C.J. Gleason. 2022. ‘The politics of pixels: A review and agenda for critical remote sensing’, Progress in Human Geography, 46, pp. 729–752.
  6. Bennett, M.M. and H.O. Faxon. 2021. ‘Uneven frontiers: Exposing the geopolitics of Myanmar’s borderlands with critical remote sensing’, ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 13, p. 1158.
  7. Biermann, C. and Gibbes, C., Chapter 4, this volume. ‘Mixed methods in tension: lessons for and from the research process’.
  8. Braun, A.C., this volume. ‘(Critical) Satellite remote sensing’.
  9. Braun, A.C. 2021. ‘More accurate less meaningful? A critical physical geographer’s reflection on interpreting remote sensing land-use analyses’, Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 45, pp. 706–735.
  10. Bryan, J. 2021. ‘Mapping resources: Mapping as method for critical resource geographies’, in The Routledge Handbook of Critical Resource Geography, ed. by M. Himley, E. Havice, and G. Valdivia (Routledge), pp. 441–452.
  11. Bunge, W. 1979. ‘Perspective on theoretical geography’, Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 69, pp. 169–174.
  12. Clough, Y., J. Barkmann, J. Juhrbandt, M. Kessler, T.C. Wanger, A. Anshary, D. Buchori, D. Cicuzza, K. Darras, D.D. Putra, et al. 2011. ‘Combining high biodiversity with high yields in tropical agroforests’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, pp. 8311–8316.
  13. Clough, Y., H. Faust, and T. Tscharntke. 2009. ‘Cacao boom and bust: sustainability of agroforests and opportunities for biodiversity conservation’, Conservation Letters, 2, pp. 197–205.
  14. Dean, J. 2021. Effects of State Enclosures and Industrial Concessions on Land Cover Change in Indonesia (University of Hawai’i at Manoa).
  15. Elden, S. 2013. ‘Secure the volume: Vertical geopolitics and the depth of power’, Political Geography, 34, pp. 35–51.
  16. Elwood, S. 2006. ‘Critical issues in participatory GIS: Deconstructions, reconstructions, and new research directions’, Transactions in GIS, 10, pp. 693–708.
  17. Erasmi, S., A. Twele, M. Ardiansyah, A. Malik, and M. Kappas. 2004. ‘Mapping deforestation and land cover conversion at the rainforest margin in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia’, EARSeL EProceedings, 3, pp. 388–397.
  18. Fairhead, J. and M. Leach. 1996. Misreading the African Landscape: Society and Ecology in a Forest-Savanna Mosaic (Cambridge University Press).
  19. Ferring, D. and H. Hausermann. 2019. ‘The political ecology of landscape change, malaria, and cumulative vulnerability in central Ghana’s gold mining country’, Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109, pp. 1074–1091.
  20. Fowler, J.M. and J. Gray. 1988. Rangeland Economics in the Arid West (Department of Agricultural Economics and Agricultural Business).
  21. Fujikane, C. 2021. Mapping Abundance for a Planetary Future: Kanaka Maoli and Critical Settler Cartographies in Hawai’i (Duke University Press).
  22. Gleason, C.J. and A.N. Hamdan. 2017. ‘Crossing the (watershed) divide: satellite data and the changing politics of international river basins’, The Geographical Journal, 183, pp. 2–15.
  23. Goldstein, J. and E. Nost. 2022. The Nature of Data: Infrastructures, Environments, Politics (University of Nebraska Press).
  24. Gorelick, N., M. Hancher, M. Dixon, S. Ilyushchenko, D. Thau, and R. Moore. 2017. ‘Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone’, Remote Sensing of Environment, 202, pp. 18–27.
  25. Graham, S. 2004. ‘Vertical geopolitics: Baghdad and after’, Antipode, 36, pp. 12–23.
  26. Hansen, M.C. and T.R. Loveland. 2012. ‘A review of large area monitoring of land cover change using Landsat data’, Remote Sensing of Environment, 122, pp. 66–74.
  27. Harvey, D. and D. Haraway. 1995. ‘Nature, politics, and possibilities: a debate and discussion with David Harvey and Donna Haraway’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 13, pp. 507–527.
  28. Havice, E., L. Campbell, and A. Boustany. 2022. ‘New data technologies and the politics of scale in environmental management: Tracking Atlantic Bluefin tuna’, Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 112, pp. 1–21.
  29. Hind, S. and S. Lammes. 2016. ‘Digital mapping as double-tap: Cartographic modes, calculations and failures’, Global Discourse, 6, pp. 79–97.
  30. Johnston, R.J. 1986. ‘Four fixations and the quest for unity in geography’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 11.4, pp. 449–453.
  31. Kelley, L.C. 2018. ‘The politics of uneven smallholder cacao expansion: A critical physical geography of agricultural transformation in Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia’, Geoforum, 97, pp. 22–34.
  32. Kelley, L.C., S.G. Evans, and M.D. Potts. 2017. ‘Richer histories for more relevant policies: 42 years of tree cover loss and gain in Southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia’, Global Change Biology, 23, pp. 830–839.
  33. Kitchin, R., J. Gleeson, and M. Dodge. 2013. ‘Unfolding mapping practices: a new epistemology for cartography’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38, pp. 480–496.
  34. Kwan, M.-P. 2016. ‘Algorithmic geographies: Big data, algorithmic uncertainty, and the production of geographic knowledge’, Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106, pp. 274–282.
  35. Kwan, M.-P. 2002. ‘Feminist visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research’, Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 92, pp. 645–661.
  36. Lane, S.N. 2017. ‘Slow science, the geographical expedition, and critical physical geography’, Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes, 61, pp. 84–101.
  37. Lave, R., C. Biermann, S.N. Lane. 2018. ‘Introducing critical physical geography’, in The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Physical Geography, ed. by R. Lave, C. Biermann, and S.N. Lane. (Springer), pp. 3–21.
  38. Lave, R., M.W. Wilson, E.S. Barron, C. Biermann, M.A. Carey, C.S. Duvall, L. Johnson, K.M. Lane, N. McClintock, D. Munroe, et al. 2014. ‘Intervention: Critical physical geography’, Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes, 58, pp. 1–10.
  39. Liboiron, M. 2021. Pollution is Colonialism (Duke University Press).
  40. Lukas, M.C. 2014. ‘Eroding battlefields: Land degradation in Java reconsidered’, Geoforum, 56, pp. 87–100.
  41. Nagel, G.W., E.M.L. de Moraes Novo, and M. Kampel. 2020. ‘Nanosatellites applied to optical Earth observation: a review’, Revista Ambiente e Água, 15.
  42. Nost, E. and J.E. Goldstein. 2022. ‘A political ecology of data’, Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 5, pp. 3–17.
  43. Öberg, G., L. Fortmann, and T. Gray. 2013. ‹Is interdisciplinary research a mashup?›, IRES Working Paper Series, 2013.2.
  44. Ogden, L.A. 2011. Swamplife: People, Gators, and Mangroves Entangled in the Everglades (University of Minnesota Press).
  45. Pattison, I. and S.N. Lane. 2012. ‘The link between land-use management and fluvial flood risk: a chaotic conception?’, Progress in Physical Geography, 36, pp. 72–92.
  46. Peluso, N.L. and P. Vandergeest. 2001. ‘Genealogies of the political forest and customary rights in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand’, J. Asian Studies, 60, pp. 761–812.
  47. Planet | Homepage. n.d. Planet, https://www.planet.com/
  48. Robbins, P. 2015. ‘The trickster science’, in The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology, ed. by P. Robbins (Routledge), pp. 89–101.
  49. Robbins, P. and T. Maddock. 2000. ‘Interrogating land cover categories: metaphor and method in remote sensing’, Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 27, pp. 295–309.
  50. Rothe, D. 2017. ‘Seeing like a satellite: Remote sensing and the ontological politics of environmental security’, Security Dialogue, 48, pp. 334–353.
  51. Ruf, F., G. Schroth, et al. 2004. ‘Chocolate forests and monocultures: a historical review of cocoa growing and its conflicting role in tropical deforestation and forest conservation’, in Agroforestry and Biodiversity Conservation in Tropical Landscapes, ed. by G. Schroth, G.A.B. Fonseca, C.A. Harvey, C. Gascon, H. Vasconcelos, and A.M.N. Izac (Island Press), pp. 107–134.
  52. Ruf, F. and C. Yoddang. 1999. ‘The impact of the economic crisis on Indonesia’s cocoa sector’, ACIAR Indonesia Research Project.
  53. Sayre, N.F. 2004. ‘The need for qualitative research to understand ranch management’, Journal of Range Management, 57, pp. 668–674.
  54. Schuurman, N. and G. Pratt. 2002. ‘Care of the subject: Feminism and critiques of GIS’, Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, 9, pp. 291–299.
  55. Silvey, R. and V. Lawson. 1999. ‘Placing the Migrant’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89, pp. 121–132.
  56. Slater, C. 2003. Fire in El Dorado, or Images of Tropical Nature and their Practical Effects (Duke University Press).
  57. Steffan-Dewenter, I., M. Kessler, J. Barkmann, M.M. Bos, D. Buchori, S. Erasmi, H. Faust, G. Gerold, K. Glenk, S.R. Gradstein, et al. 2007. ‘Tradeoffs between income, biodiversity, and ecosystem functioning during tropical rainforest conversion and agroforestry intensification’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, pp. 4973–4978.
  58. TallBear, K. 2014. ‘Standing with and speaking as faith: a feminist-indigenous approach to inquiry’, Journal of Research Practice, 10, p. N17.
  59. Turner, M.D. 2003. ‘Methodological reflections on the use of remote sensing and geographic information science in human ecological research’, Human Ecology, 31, pp. 255–279.
  60. Woodcock, C.E., R. Allen, M. Anderson, A. Belward, R. Bindschadler, W. Cohen, F. Gao, S.N. Goward, D. Helder, E. Helmer, et al. 2008. ‘Free access to Landsat imagery’, Science, 320, p. 1011.
  61. Yang, L., J. Driscol, S. Sarigai, Q. Wu, H. Chen, and C.D. Lippitt. 2022. ‘Google Earth engine and artificial intelligence (AI): a comprehensive review’, Remote Sensing, 14.
  62. Zhu, A. and N.L. Peluso. 2021. ‘From gold to rosewood: Agrarian change, high-value resources, and the flexible frontier-makers of the twenty-first century’, in The Routledge Handbook of Critical Resource Geography, ed. by M. Himley, E. Havice, G. Valdivia (Routledge), pp. 345–357.
  63. Zhu, Z., M.A. Wulder, D.P. Roy, C.E. Woodcock, M.C. Hansen, V.C. Radeloff, S.P. Healey, C. Schaaf, P. Hostert, P. Strobl, J.-F. Pekel, L. Lymburner, N. Pahlevan, and T.A. Scambos. 2019. ‘Benefits of the free and open Landsat data policy’, Remote Sensing of Environment, 224, pp. 382–385.

Export Metadata

UK registered social enterprise and Community Interest Company (CIC).

Company registration 14549556

Metadata

  • By book
  • By publisher
  • GraphQL API
  • Export API

Resources

  • Downloads
  • Videos
  • Merch
  • Presentations
  • Service status

Contact

  • Email
  • Bluesky
  • Mastodon
  • Github

Copyright © 2026 Thoth Open Metadata. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.