Skip to main content
Login
  1. Home
  2. The Field Guide to Mixing Social and Biophysical Methods in Environmental Research
  3. 14. The interface between hydrological modelling and political ecology
Open Book Publishers

The interface between hydrological modelling and political ecology

  • Maria Rusca(author)
  • Maurizio Mazzoleni(author)
Chapter of: The Field Guide to Mixing Social and Biophysical Methods in Environmental Research(pp. 247–278)
  • Export Metadata
  • Metadata
  • Locations
  • Contributors
  • References

Export Metadata

Metadata
Title The interface between hydrological modelling and political ecology
ContributorMaria Rusca(author)
Maurizio Mazzoleni(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0418.14
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0418/chapters/10.11647/obp.0418.14
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
CopyrightMaria Rusca; Maurizio Mazzoleni;
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2025-02-25
Long abstract

This chapter considers the potential of models to work as a boundary object between the hydrological sciences and political ecology. First, we discuss how political ecology and science and technology studies have critiqued mainstream perspectives on science as neutral, and shielded from political influences and power dynamics. In response to this critique, we propose two alternative approaches to hydrological modelling, showing how methods can be mixed in ways that make modelling potentially more democratic, reflexive and situated. The first approach concerns participatory modelling and its potential to redistribute power and ‘expertise’ across different knowledge holders. The second concerns an engagement with political ecology to develop models that are more attuned to the role of power in shaping water-related development challenges and the uneven outcomes thereof. We conclude that power-sensitive modelling has the potential to generate insights to enable more just water policies and actions.

Page rangepp. 247–278
Print length32 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Locations
Landing PageFull text URLPlatform
PDFhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0418/chapters/10.11647/obp.0418.14Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0418.14.pdfFull text URL
HTMLhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0418/chapters/10.11647/obp.0418.14Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0418/ch14.xhtmlFull text URLPublisher Website
Contributors

Maria Rusca

(author)
Senior Lecturer in Global Development at University of Manchester
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4513-3213

Maurizio Mazzoleni

(author)
Assistant Professor at Vrije University Amsterdam
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0913-9370
References
  1. Addor, N. and L.A. Melsen. 2019. ‘Legacy, rather than adequacy, drives the selection of hydrological models’, Water Resources Research, 55.1, pp. 378–390. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018wr022958 
  2. Adger, W.N. 2006. ‘Vulnerability’, Global Environmental Change, 16.3, pp. 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006 
  3. Arnstein, S.R. 1969. ‘A ladder of citizen participation’, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35.4, pp. 216–224.
  4. Bakker, K., and G. Bridge. 2006. ‘Material worlds? Resource geographies and the matter of nature’, Progress in Human Geography, 30.1, pp. 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132506ph588oa 
  5. Basco-Carrera, L., A. Warren, E. van Beek, A. Jonoski, and A. Giardino. 2017. ‘Collaborative modelling or participatory modelling? A framework for water resources management’, Environmental Modelling and Software, 91, pp. 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.014 
  6. Beck, M., and T. Krueger. 2016. ‘The epistemic, ethical, and political dimensions of uncertainty in integrated assessment modeling’, WIREs Climate Change, 7.5, pp. 627–645. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.415 
  7. Boelens, R., J. Hoogesteger, E. Swyngedouw, J. Vos, and P. Wester. 2016. ‘Hydrosocial territories: a political ecology perspective’, Water international, 41(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2016.1134898 
  8. Bolin, B. 2007. ‘Race, class, ethnicity, and disaster vulnerability’, in Handbook of Disaster Research, ed. by H. Rodríguez, E.L. Quarantelli, and R.R. Dynes (Springer), pp. 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_7 
  9. Bouleau, G. 2014. ‘The co-production of science and waterscapes: the case of the Seine and the Rhône Rivers, France’, Geoforum, 57, pp. 248–257.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.01.009 
  10. Budds, J. 2009. ‘Contested H2O: Science, policy and politics in water resources management in Chile’, Geoforum, 40.3, pp. 418–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.12.008 
  11. Bullard, R.D. and B. Wright. 2009. ‘Race, place and the environment in post-Katrina New Orleans’, in Race, Place and Environmental Justice after Hurricane Katrina: Struggles to Reclaim, Rebuild and Revitalize New Orleans and the Gulf Coast, ed. by R.D. Bullard and B. Wright (Routledge), pp. 19–48. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429497858-1 
  12. Castree, N. 2015. ‘Changing the Anthropo(s)cene: Geographers, global environmental change and the politics of knowledge’, Dialogues in Human Geography, 5.3, pp. 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820615613216 
  13. Castro, J. E. 2007. ‘Water governance in the twentieth-first century’, Ambiente y Sociedade, 10, pp. 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1414-753x2007000200007 
  14. Collard, R.-C., L.M. Harris, N. Heynen, and L. Mehta. 2018. ‘The antinomies of nature and space.’ Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 1, no. 1–2 (2018): 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848618777162
  15. Collins, T.W. 2009. ‘The production of unequal risk in hazardscapes: An explanatory frame applied to disaster at the US–Mexico border’, Geoforum, 40.4, pp. 589–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.04.009 
  16. Collins, T.W. 2010. ‘Marginalization, facilitation, and the production of unequal risk: the 2006 Paso del Norte floods’, Antipode, 42.2, pp. 258–288.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00755.x 
  17. Cornwall, A. 2008. ‘Unpacking “participation”: Models, meanings and practices’, Community Development Journal, 43.3, pp. 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsn010 
  18. Cousins, J.J. and J.P. Newell. 2015. ‘A political–industrial ecology of water supply infrastructure for Los Angeles’, Geoforum, 58, pp. 38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.10.011 
  19. Cretney, R. 2019. ‘“An opportunity to hope and dream”: Disaster politics and the emergence of possibility through community-led recovery’, Antipode, 51.2, pp. 497–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12431 
  20. Cutter, S.L., B.J. Boruff, and W.L. Shirley. 2003. ‘Social vulnerability to environmental hazards’, Social Science Quarterly, 84.2, pp. 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8402002 
  21. Demeritt, D. 2001. ‘The construction of global warming and the politics of science’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91.2, pp. 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00245 
  22. Di Baldassarre, G., A. Viglione, G. Carr, L. Kuil, J.L. Salinas, and G. Blöschl. 2013. ‘Socio-hydrology: Conceptualising human-flood interactions’, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17.8, pp. 3295–3303. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3295-2013 
  23. Di Baldassarre, G., M. Sivapalan, M. Rusca, C. Cudennec, M. Garcia, H. Kreibich, and S. Pande. 2019. ‘Sociohydrology: Scientific challenges in addressing the sustainable development goals’, Water Resources Research, 55.8, pp. 6327–6355. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018wr023901 
  24. Donaldson, A., S. Lane, N. Ward, and S. Whatmore. 2013. ‘Overflowing with issues: Following the political trajectories of flooding’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31.4, pp. 603–618.  https://doi.org/10.1068/c11230 
  25. Donovan, A. 2017. ‘Geopower: Reflections on the critical geography of disasters’, Progress in Human Geography, 41.1, pp. 44–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515627020 
  26. Dreyer, M. and O. Renn. 2011. ‘Participatory approaches to modelling for improved learning and decision‐making in natural resource governance: an editorial’, in Environmental Policy and Governance, pp. 379–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.584 
  27. Enarson, E. 1998. ‘Through women’s eyes: A gendered research agenda for disaster social science’, Disasters, 22.2, pp. 157–173.
  28. Falconi, S.M. and R.N. Palmer. 2017. ‘An interdisciplinary framework for participatory modeling design and evaluation—What makes models effective participatory decision tools?’, Water Resources Research, 53.2, pp. 1625–1645. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016wr019373 
  29. Forsyth, T. 2004. Critical Political Ecology: The Politics of Environmental Science (Routledge). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203017562
  30. Forsyth, T. 2011. ‘Politicizing environmental explanations: What can political ecology learn from sociology and philosophy of science?’, in Knowing Nature: Conversations at the Intersection of Political Ecology and Science Studies, ed. by M.J. Goldman, P. Nadasdy, and M.D. Turner (University of Chicago Press), pp. 31–46. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226301440.001.0001 
  31. Gandy, M. 2022. ‘Urban political ecology: a critical reconfiguration’, Progress in Human Geography, 46.1, pp. 21–43.  https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325211040553 
  32. Gawronski, V.T. and R.S. Olson. 2013. ‘Disasters as crisis triggers for critical junctures? The 1976 Guatemala case’, Latin American Politics and Society, 55.2, pp. 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2013.00196.x 
  33. Goldman, M.J., Nadasdy, P., and M.D. Turner. 2019. Knowing Nature: Conversations at the Intersection of Political Ecology and Science Studies (University of Chicago Press). https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226301440.001.0001 
  34. Hamideh, S. and J. Rongerude. 2018. ‘Social vulnerability and participation in disaster recovery decisions: Public housing in Galveston after Hurricane Ike’, Natural Hazards, 93.3, pp. 1629–1648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3371-3 
  35. Haraway, D. 1988. ‘Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective’, Feminist Studies, 14.3, pp. 575–599.
  36. Harris, D.M. 2022. ‘The trouble with modeling the human into the future climate’, GeoHumanities, 8.2, pp. 382–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566x.2022.2043764 
  37. Harvey, D. 2012. Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution (Verso). https://doi.org/10.4067/s0250-71612014000100013 
  38. Hoque, S.F., C.H. Quinn, and S.M. Sallu. 2017. ‘Resilience, political ecology, and well-being: An interdisciplinary approach to understanding social-ecological change in coastal Bangladesh’, Ecology and Society, 22.2, p. 45. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-09422-220245 
  39. Jasanoff, S. 2010. ‘A new climate for society’, Theory, Culture and Society, 27.2–3, pp. 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839456668-021 
  40. Keegan, C. 2020. ‘“Black Workers Matter”: Black labor geographies and uneven redevelopment in post-Katrina New Orleans’, Urban Geography, 42.3, pp. 340-359. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2020.1712121 
  41. Kimmelman, M. 2017. ‘Lessons from Hurricane Harvey: Houston’s struggle is America’s tale’, New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/Interactive/2017/11/11/Climate/Houston-Flooding-Climate.html
  42. King, L. and M. Tadaki. 2018. ‘A framework for understanding the politics of science (Core Tenet# 2)’, in The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Physical Geography, ed. by R. Lave, C. Biermann, and S.N. Lane (Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 67–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71461-5_4 
  43. Klein, N. 2007. The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism (Macmillan).
  44. Krueger, T., Chapter 26, this volume. ‘Environmental modelling’.
  45. Landström, C., Chapter 35, this volume. ‘Participatory modelling’.
  46. Landström, C., S.J. Whatmore, S.N. Lane, N.A. Odoni, N. Ward, and S. Bradley. 2011. ‘Coproducing flood risk knowledge: Redistributing expertise in critical “participatory modelling”’, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 43.7, pp. 1617–1633.  https://doi.org/10.1068/a43482 
  47. Lane, S.N. 2014. ‘Acting, predicting and intervening in a socio-hydrological world’, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18.3, pp. 927–952. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-927-2014 
  48. Lane, S.N., Chapter 24, this volume. ‘Case studies’.
  49. Lane, S.N., Chapter 30, this volume. ‘Hydraulic modelling’.
  50. Lane, S.N., N. Odoni, C. Landström, S.J. Whatmore, N. Ward, and S. Bradley. 2011a. ‘Doing flood risk science differently: an experiment in radical scientific method’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36.1, pp. 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2010.00410.x 
  51. Lane, S.N., C. Landström, and S.J. Whatmore. 2011b. ‘Imagining flood futures: Risk assessment and management in practice’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369.1942, pp. 1784–1806. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0346 
  52. Law, J. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research (Psychology Press).
  53. Lemos, M.C. 2008. ‘Whose water is it anyway? Water management, knowledge and equity in Northeast Brazil’, in Water, Place, and Equity, ed. by J.M. Whiteley, H.Ingram, and R.W. Perry (MIT Press), pp. 249–270. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262232715.003.0009 
  54. Loftus, A., H. March, and T.F. Purcell. 2019. ‘The political economy of water infrastructure: an introduction to financialization’, WIREs Water, 6.1, p. e1326.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1326 
  55. Luft, R.E. 2009. ‘Beyond disaster exceptionalism: Social movement developments in New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina’, American Quarterly, 61.3, pp. 499–527. https://doi.org/10.1353/aq.2009.a317270 
  56. Makarigakis, A.K., and B.E. Jimenez-Cisneros. 2019. ‘UNESCO’s contribution to face global water challenges’, Water, 11.2, p. 388. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020388 
  57. Mazzoleni, M., L. Alfonso, J. Chacon-Hurtado, and D. Solomatine. 2015. ‘Assimilating uncertain, dynamic and intermittent streamflow observations in hydrological models’, Advances in Water Resources, 83, pp. 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.07.004 
  58. Mazzoleni, M., V.O. Odongo, E. Mondino, and G. Di Baldassarre. 2021. ‘Water management, hydrological extremes, and society: Modeling interactions and phenomena’, Ecology and Society, 26.4.  https://doi.org/10.5751/es-12643-260404 
  59. McClintock, N. 2015. ‘A critical physical geography of urban soil contamination’, Geoforum, 65, pp. 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.07.010 
  60. McLaren, D. and N. Markusson. 2020. ‘The co-evolution of technological promises, modelling, policies and climate change targets’, Nature Climate Change, 10.5, pp. 392–397. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0740-1 
  61. Meadows, D.H., 1999. Leverage points: Places to intervene in a system. https://donellameadows.org/archives/leverage-points-places-to-intervene-in-a-system/
  62. Melsen, L., Chapter 31, this volume. ‘Hydrological modelling’.
  63. Moore, J.W. 2017. ‘The Capitalocene, Part I: on the nature and origins of our ecological crisis’, The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44.3, pp. 594–630.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1235036 
  64. Olson, R.S. and V.T. Gawronski. 2003. ‘Disasters as critical junctures? Managua, Nicaragua 1972 and Mexico City 1985’, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 21.1, pp. 3–35.  https://doi.org/10.1177/028072700302100101 
  65. Pelling, M. and K. Dill. 2010. ‘Disaster politics: Tipping points for change in the adaptation of sociopolitical regimes’, Progress in Human Geography, 34.1, pp. 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132509105004 
  66. Perreault, T., G. Bridge, and J. McCarthy. 2015. The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology (Routledge).
  67. Pratt, G. 2009. ‘Positionality’, in The Dictionary of Human Geography, ed. by A. Rogers, N. Castree, and R. Kitchin (Oxford University Press), pp. 556–557.
  68. Ravera, F., K. Hubacek, M. Reed, and D. Tarrasón. 2011. ‘Learning from experiences in adaptive action research: A critical comparison of two case studies applying participatory scenario development and modelling approaches’, Environmental Policy and Governance, 21.6, pp. 433–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.585 
  69. Rozario, K. 2019. The Culture of Calamity: Disaster and the Making of Modern America. (University of Chicago Press).  https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226230214.001.0001 
  70. Rubiano Rivadeneira, N. and W. Carton. 2022. ‘(In)justice in modelled climate futures: A review of integrated assessment modelling critiques through a justice lens’, Energy Research and Social Science, 92, 102781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102781 
  71. Rusca, M., A.S. Boakye-Ansah, A. Loftus, G. Ferrero, and P. Van Der Zaag. 2017. ‘An interdisciplinary political ecology of drinking water quality. Exploring socio-ecological inequalities in Lilongwe’s water supply network’, Geoforum, 84, pp. 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.06.013 
  72. Rusca, M. and F. Cleaver. 2022. ‘Unpacking everyday urbanism: Practices and the making of (un) even urban waterscapes’, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, e1581. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1581 
  73. Rusca, M. and G. Di Baldassarre. 2019. ‘Interdisciplinary critical geographies of water: Capturing the mutual shaping of society and hydrological flows’, Water, 11.10, p. 1973. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11101973 
  74. Rusca, M., N.J. Gulamussen, J. Weststrate, E.I. Nguluve, E.M. Salvador, P. Paron, and G. Ferrero. 2021. ‘The urban metabolism of waterborne diseases: Variegated citizenship, (waste) water flows, and climatic variability in Maputo, Mozambique’, Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 112.4, pp. 1159–1178. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2021.1956875 
  75. Rusca, M., G. Messori, and G. Di Baldassarre. 2021. ‘Scenarios of human responses to unprecedented social‐environmental extreme events’, Earth’s Future, 9.4. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020ef001911 
  76. Rusca, M., E. Savelli, G. Di Baldassarre, A. Biza, and G. Messori. 2023. ‘Unprecedented droughts are expected to exacerbate urban inequalities in Southern Africa’, Nature Climate Change, 13.1, pp. 98–105.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01546-8 
  77. Savelli, E., M. Mazzoleni, G. Di Baldassarre, H. Cloke, and M. Rusca. 2023. ‘Urban water crises driven by elites’ unsustainable consumption’, Nature Sustainability, 6, pp. 929–940. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-023-01100-0 
  78. Savelli, E., M. Rusca, H. Cloke, T.J. Flügel, A. Karriem, and G. Di Baldassarre. 2022. ‘All dried up: The materiality of drought in Ladismith, South Africa’, Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-1991 
  79. Schwartz, K., M. Tutusaus Luque, M. Rusca, and R. Ahlers. 2015. ‘(In) formality: The meshwork of water service provisioning’, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 2.1, pp. 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1056 
  80. Shaw, I.G.R. 2012. ‘Towards an evental geography’, Progress in Human Geography, 36.5, pp. 613–627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511435002 
  81. Simandan, D. 2019. ‘Revisiting positionality and the thesis of situated knowledge’, Dialogues in Human Geography, 9.2, pp. 129–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820619850013 
  82. Simon, G.L. 2014. ‘Vulnerability-in-production: A spatial history of nature, affluence, and fire in Oakland, California’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104.6, pp. 1199–1221.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2014.941736 
  83. Sivapalan, M., H.H.G. Savenije, and G. Blöschl. 2012. ‘Socio-hydrology: A new science of people and water’, Hydrological Processes, 26.8, pp. 1270–1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8426 
  84. Solomatine, D.P. and T. Wagener. 2011. ‘Hydrological modelling’, in The Science of Hydrology. Treatise on Water Science, ed. by P.A. Wilderer (Elsevier), pp. 435–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-53199-5.00044-0 
  85. Srinivasan, V., E.F. Lambin, S.M. Gorelick, B.H. Thompson, and S. Rozelle. 2012. ‘The nature and causes of the global water crisis: Syndromes from a meta-analysis of coupled human-water studies’, Water Resources Research, 48.10, pp. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011wr011087 
  86. Sultana, F. 2020. ‘Embodied intersectionalities of urban citizenship: Water, infrastructure, and gender in the global South’, Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 110.5, pp. 1407–1424. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1715193 
  87. Sultana, F. 2022. ‘The unbearable heaviness of climate coloniality’, Political Geography, 99, 102638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102638 
  88. Swyngedouw, E. 1997. ‘Power, nature, and the city. The conquest of water and the political ecology of urbanization in Guayaquil, Ecuador: 1880–1990’, Environment and Planning A, 29.2, pp. 311–332.
  89. Swyngedouw, E. 2004. Social Power and the Urbanization of Water: Flows of Power. (Oxford University Press). ://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198233916.001.0001 
  90. ter Horst, R., Alba, R., Vos, J., Rusca, M., Godinez-Madrigal, J., Babel, L. V.,. .. & Krueger, T. (2023). Making a case for power-sensitive water modelling: a literature review. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 2023, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-28-4157-2024
  91. Turner, M.D. 2011. ‘Production of environmental knowledge: Scientists, complex natures, and the question of agency’, in Knowing Nature: Conversations at the Intersection of Political Ecology and Science Studies, ed. by M.J. Goldman, P. Nadasdy, and M.D. Turner (University of Chicago Press), pp. 25–29.  https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226301440.001.0001 
  92. Walker, P.A. 2005. ‘Political ecology: Where is the ecology?’, Progress in Human Geography, 29.1, pp. 73–82. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132505ph530pr 
  93. Webler, T., S. Tuler, and T. Dietz. 2011. ‘Modellers’ and outreach professionals’ views on the role of models in watershed management’, Environmental Policy and Governance, 21.6, pp. 472–486.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.587 
  94. Whatmore, S.J. and C. Landström. 2011. ‘Flood apprentices: an exercise in making things public’, Economy and Society, 40.4, pp. 582–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2011.602540 
  95. Wu, P., N. Christidis, and P. Stott. 2013. ‘Anthropogenic impact on Earth’s hydrological cycle’, Nature Climate Change, 3.9, pp. 807–810. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1932 
  96. Yates, J.S., L.M. Harris, and N.J. Wilson. 2017. ‘Multiple ontologies of water: Politics, conflict and implications for governance’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35.5, pp. 797–815. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775817700395 
  97. Zwarteveen, M., J.S. Kemerink-Seyoum, M. Kooy, J. Evers, T.A. Guerrero, B. Batubara, and A. Wesselink. 2017. ‘Engaging with the politics of water governance’, WIREs Water, 4.6, e1245. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1245 

Export Metadata

UK registered social enterprise and Community Interest Company (CIC).

Company registration 14549556

Metadata

  • By book
  • By publisher
  • GraphQL API
  • Export API

Resources

  • Downloads
  • Videos
  • Merch
  • Presentations
  • Service status

Contact

  • Email
  • Bluesky
  • Mastodon
  • Github

Copyright © 2026 Thoth Open Metadata. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.