Skip to main content
Login
  1. Home
  2. The Field Guide to Mixing Social and Biophysical Methods in Environmental Research
  3. 35. Participatory modelling
Open Book Publishers

Participatory modelling

  • Catharina Landström(author)
Chapter of: The Field Guide to Mixing Social and Biophysical Methods in Environmental Research(pp. 521–526)
  • Export Metadata
  • Metadata
  • Locations
  • Contributors
  • References

Export Metadata

Metadata
Title Participatory modelling
ContributorCatharina Landström(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0418.35
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0418/chapters/10.11647/obp.0418.35
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
CopyrightCatharina Landström;
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2025-02-25
Long abstract

Participatory modelling is a type of environmental participation that emphasizes co-production of knowledge. Purposes range from empowering local communities to accessing data that cannot be collected by other means, to impacting environmental management. Procedures vary with lay participant involvement, their backgrounds, numbers and relationships to the processes modelled.

Page rangepp. 521–526
Print length6 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Locations
Landing PageFull text URLPlatform
PDFhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0418/chapters/10.11647/obp.0418.35Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0418.35.pdfFull text URL
HTMLhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0418/chapters/10.11647/obp.0418.35Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0418/ch35.xhtmlFull text URLPublisher Website
Contributors

Catharina Landström

(author)
Associate Professor, Science, Technology and Society at Chalmers University of Technology
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7782-1438
References
  1. Hare, M. 2011. ‘Forms of participatory modelling and its potential for widespread adoption in the water sector’, Environmental Policy and Governance, 21.6, pp. 386–402. This article overviews participatory modelling in water research in relation to water management.
  2. Glicken, J. 2000. ‘Getting stakeholder participation “right”: a discussion of participatory processes and possible pitfalls’, Environmental Science & Policy, 3.6, pp. 305–310.
  3. Voinov, A., K. Jenni, S. Gray, N. Kolagani, P.D. Glynn, P. Bommel, et al. 2018. ‘Tools and methods in participatory modeling: Selecting the right tool for the job’, Environmental Modelling and Software, 109, pp. 232–255. Drawing on extensive experience the authors discuss the pros and cons of different participatory environmental modelling approaches.
  4. Whatmore, S. J. and C. Landström. 2011. ‘Flood-apprentices: an exercise in making things public’, Economy and Society, 40.4, pp. 582–610. This case study details the way in which participatory modelling can impact on local flood management politics.
  5. Gray, S., R. Jordan, A. Crall, G. Newman, C. Hmelo-Silver, J. Huang, W. Novak, D. Mellor, T. Frensley, M. Prysby, and A. Singer. 2017. ‘Combining participatory modelling and citizen science to support volunteer conservation action’, Biological Conservation, 208, pp. 76–86.
  6. Hedelin, B., S. Gray, S. Woehlke, T.K. BenDor, A. Singer, R. Jordan, M. Zellner, P. Giabbanelli, P. Glynn, K. Jenni, and A. Jetter. 2021. ‘What’s left before participatory modeling can fully support real-world environmental planning processes: a case study review’, Environmental Modelling & Software, 143, p. 105073.
  7. Hore, K., J. Gaillard, T. Davies, and R. Kearns. 2021. ‘Participatory research in practice: Understandings of power and embodied methodologies’, New Zealand Geographer, 77.3, pp. 221–229.
  8. Landström, C. 2020. Environmental Participation. Practices Engaging the Public with Science and Governance (Palgrave MacMillan).
  9. Landström, C. 2017. Transdisciplinary Environmental Research: A Practical Approach (Palgrave MacMillan).
  10. Lane, S.N., N.A. Odoni, C. Landström, S.J. Whatmore, N. Ward, and S. Bradley. 2011 ‘Doing flood risk science differently: an experiment in radical scientific method’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 36.1, pp. 15–36.
  11. Reed, M. 2008. ‘Stakeholder participation for environmental management’, Biological Conservation, 141.10, pp. 2417–2431.
  12. Ritzema, H., J. Froebrich, R. Raju, C. Sreenivas, and R. Kselik. 2010. ‘Using participatory modelling to compensate for data scarcity in environmental planning: a case study from India’, Environmental Modelling & Software, 25.11, pp. 1450–1458.
  13. Skarlatidou, A. et al. 2019. ‘The value of stakeholder mapping to enhance co-creation in citizen science initiatives’, Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 4.1, pp. 1–10.
  14. Stave, Krystyna. 2010. ‘Participatory system dynamics modeling for sustainable environmental management: Observations from four cases’, Sustainability, 2.9, pp. 2762–2784.
  15. Whitman, G.P., R. Pain, and D.G. Milledge. 2015. ‘Going with the flow? Using participatory action research in physical geography’, Progress in Physical Geography, 39.5, pp. 622–639.

Export Metadata

UK registered social enterprise and Community Interest Company (CIC).

Company registration 14549556

Metadata

  • By book
  • By publisher
  • GraphQL API
  • Export API

Resources

  • Downloads
  • Videos
  • Merch
  • Presentations
  • Service status

Contact

  • Email
  • Bluesky
  • Mastodon
  • Github

Copyright © 2026 Thoth Open Metadata. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.