Skip to main content
Open Book Publishers

3. Netflix and the shaping of global politics

  • Diane Colman (author)
Chapter of: Digital Humanities in the India Rim: Contemporary Scholarship in Australia and India(pp. 45–66)

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.1
  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Metadata
Title3. Netflix and the shaping of global politics
ContributorDiane Colman (author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0423.03
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0423/chapters/10.11647/obp.0423.03
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
CopyrightDiane Colman
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2024-11-06
Long abstractThis chapter begins by outlining the meaning and importance of soft power in global politics and briefly detailing the consideration of popular culture in the International Relations (IR) discipline. It then provides a detailed description of the research design of the database project, taking account of positivist conventions in qualitative studies by utilising the hybrid methodologies in the Digital Humanities interdisciplinary approach. International Relations as a discipline understands power on a global scale. Such understanding includes the concept of ‘soft power’ and the role of popular culture in projecting and universalising hegemonic state values. In the globalised world of today, the power of individuals often transcends state boundaries. This case study is about Netflix, which, as a global actor, is the leading entertainment streaming service. Netflix has considerable capacity to influence its audiences’ ideas about the world, projecting immense soft power worldwide. Examining the ideological basis of this power is important in understanding world politics. The creation of a comprehensive database that categorises all Netflix Original films according to a carefully selected set of ontologies provides the epistemological tools necessary to suit the needs of IR studies.
Page rangepp. 45–66
Print length22 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Contributors

Diane Colman

(author)
Lecturer in International Relations and Global Politics in the School of Humanities and Communication Arts at Western Sydney University

Dr Diane Colman is a Lecturer in International Relations and Global Politics in the School of Humanities and Communication Arts at Western Sydney University. Her research focuses on the globalisation of ideas on social justice and their culturally sensitive, inclusive application to local challenges. Diane’s interests have concentrated on the Asia-Pacific and include East Timor's struggle with Australia for sovereignty over its seabed and consequent control over the substantial oil and gas resources required for its development. This concern with development led to research on the developmental state, extending internationally influential ideas on the role of the state in socio-economic transformation by applying them to the challenges of culturally distinct Asia-Pacific countries with an emphasis on the sustainable, long-term interests of society in Korea and Papua New Guinea. Applying the conceptual framework of culturally sensitive collective action in a globalised world has led Diane to an interest in the intersection between popular culture and world politics, forging a new multidisciplinary approach to global power.

References
  1. Barthes, R. (2009). Mythologies. Vintage Classics.
  2. Bruner, S. (2019). I’m so bored with the canon: Removing the qualifier “popular” from our cultures. The Popular Culture Studies Journal 7(1), 6–16.
  3. Cox, R. (1983). Gramsci, hegemony and International Relations: An essay in method, Millennium 12(2), 162–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298830120020701
  4. Furman D.J. & Musgrave, P. (2017). Synthetic experiences: How popular culture matters for images of International Relations. International Studies Quarterly 61, 503–516. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx053
  5. Demianyk, G. (2017, February 12). Ken Loach damns government over child refugees after ‘I Daniel Blake’ BAFTA Win. Huffington Post UK. https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/ken-loach-bafta-child-refugees-i-daniel-blake_uk_58a0d95ae4b094a129ec2a20
  6. Dittmer, J. (2005). Captain America’s empire: Reflections on identity, popular culture and geopolitics. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95 (3), 626–643. https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00478.x
  7. Dittmer, J. (2010). Popular Culture, Geopolitics and Identity. Rowman and Littlefield.
  8. Edensor, T. (2002). National Identity, Popular Culture and Everyday Life, Berg. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003086178
  9. Galloway, A. (2006). Gaming: Essays on Algorithmic Culture. University of Minnesota Press.
  10. Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. Basic Books.
  11. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Lawrence and Wishart.
  12. Grayson, K., Davies, M., & Philpott, S. (2009). Pop goes IR? Researching the popular culture-world politics continuum. Politics 29(3), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2009.01351.x
  13. Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. Sage Publications & Open University.
  14. Hallinan, B., & Striphas, T. (2016). Recommended for you: The Netflix Prize and the production of algorithmic culture. New Media and Society 18(1), 17–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814538646
  15. Hartley, J. (1994). The Politics of Pictures. Psychology Press.
  16. Jenner, M. (2018). Netflix and the Re-invention of Television. Palgrave MacMillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94316-9
  17. Khalil, J., & Zayani, M. (2020). De-territorialized digital capitalism and the predicament of the nation-state: Netflix in Arabia. Media, Culture and Society, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720932505
  18. King, G., Keohane, R., & Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press.
  19. Landau, N. (2016). TV Outside the Box: Trailblazing in the Digital Television Revolution. Focal Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315694481
  20. Moore, K. (2022). Netflix Original Now Make Up 50% of Overall US Library.What’s On Netflix. whats-on-netflix.com
  21. Netflix. (2023). ‘About’. https://about.netflix.com/en
  22. Nexon, D., & Neuman, I. (Eds). (2006). Harry Potter and International Relations. Rowman and Littlefield.
  23. Nye, J. (1990). Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power. Basic Books.
  24. Nye, J. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Public Affairs. https://doi.org/10.2307/1148580
  25. Nye, J. (2011). The Future of Power. Public Affairs.
  26. Nye, J. (2017). Soft power: The origins and political progress of a concept. Palgrave Communications 3, 17008. https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2017.8
  27. Onuf, N. (1989). World of Our Making: Rule and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. University of South Carolina Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203096710
  28. Pajkovic, N. (2022). Algorithms and taste-making: Exposing the Netflix recommender system’s operational logics. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565211014464
  29. Philpott, S. (2010). Is anyone watching? War, cinema and bearing witness. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 23(2), 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571003735378
  30. Reinherd, C.L. (2019). Introduction: Why popular culture matters. The Popular Culture Studies Journal 7(1), 1–5.
  31. Reus-Smith, C. (1999). The Moral Purpose of the State. Princeton University Press.
  32. Shepherd, L. (2019). Authors and authenticity: Knowledge, representation and research in contemporary world politics. In C. Hamilton and L. Shepherd (Eds). Understanding Popular Culture and World Politics in the Digital Age. Routledge.
  33. Slavin, K. (2011). How algorithms shape our world. TEDGlobal. http://www.ted.com/ talks/kevin_slavin_how_algorithms_shape_our_world.html
  34. Smith, S. (2000). The discipline of International Relations: Still an American social science? British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2(3), 374–402.
  35. Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform Capitalism. Polity Press.
  36. Striphas, T. (2012). What is an algorithm? Culture Digitally. http://culturedigitally. org/2012/02/what-is-an-algorithm/
  37. Wasko, J., & Meehan, E. (Eds). (2019). A Companion to Television. (2e). Wiley-Blackwell.
  38. Weber, C. (2005). International Relations Theory: A Critical Introduction. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008644
  39. Weldes, J. (2001). Globalisation is science fiction. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 30. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298010300030201
  40. Weldes, J. (2006). High politics and low data: Globalization discourses and popular culture. In D. Yanow & P. Schwartz-Shea (Eds). Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. (pp. 176–186). M.E. Sharpe.
  41. Weldes, J. (Ed.). (2003). To Seek Out New Worlds: Exploring Links between Science Fiction and World Politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
  42. Weldes, J., & Rowley, C. (Eds). (2015). So, how does popular culture relate to global politics? E-International Relations. https://www.e-ir.info/2015/04/29/so-how-does-popular-culture-relate-to-world-politics/
  43. Wendt, A. (1992). Social Theory of International Relations. Cambridge University Press.
  44. Wu, T. (2013). Netflix’s war on mass culture. The New Republic. https://newrepublic.com/article/115687/netflixs-war-mass-culture
  45. Wu, T. (2015, January 27). Netflix’s secret special algorithm is a human. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/hollywoods-big-data-big-deal
  46. Zahran, G., & Ramos, L. (2010). From hegemony to soft power: Implications of a conceptual change. In I. Pamar & M. Cox (Eds). Soft Power and US Foreign Policy: Theoretical, Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Taylor and Francis.
  47. Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Profile Books.