Skip to main content
  • Pricing
  • Policies
  • Support us
  • Login
Sign up
  1. Home
  2. Imagery of Hate Online
  3. 9. Studying soft hate speech online: Synthesising approaches from multimodality research and argumentation theory
Open Book Publishers

9. Studying soft hate speech online: Synthesising approaches from multimodality research and argumentation theory

  • Dimitris Serafis (author)
  • Janina Wildfeuer (author)
Chapter of: Imagery of Hate Online(pp. 201–220)
  • Export Metadata
  • Metadata
  • Locations
  • Contributors
  • References

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.1
  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
    • EBSCO Host
    • ProQuest Ebrary
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Metadata
Title9. Studying soft hate speech online
SubtitleSynthesising approaches from multimodality research and argumentation theory
ContributorDimitris Serafis (author)
Janina Wildfeuer (author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0447.09
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0447/chapters/10.11647/obp.0447.09
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
CopyrightDimitris Serafis; Janina Wildfeuer;
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2025-05-02
Long abstractIn this chapter, we analyse the reasoning that underlies implicit forms of hate speech in online communication. Focusing particularly on the multimodal complexity of particular news items, we aim to identify soft manifestations of hate speech in visual-verbal combinations. To achieve this aim, we provide an integrative, multi-layered approach that includes analytical tools from both multimodality studies and argumentation theory. This helps us to build a semantic representation of the multimodal artefact, interpreting this semantic representation with regard to the aim of delimiting contextual ambiguity, and, finally, showcasing the argumentative structure of the news item to make the inferential reasoning explicit.
Page rangepp. 201–220
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Locations
Landing PageFull text URLPlatform
PDFhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0447/chapters/10.11647/obp.0447.09Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0447.09.pdfFull text URL
HTMLhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0447/chapters/10.11647/obp.0447.09Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0447/ch9.xhtmlFull text URLPublisher Website
Contributors

Dimitris Serafis

(author)
Assistant Professor at University of Groningen
https://www.rug.nl/staff/d.serafis/?lang=en

Dr Dimitris Serafis is Assistant Professor at the Faculty of Arts / Center for Language and Cognition (CLCG), Department of Communication and Information Studies, at the University of Groningen, The Netherlands. His research interests lie at the intersection of critical discourse studies, social semiotics and multimodality, and argumentation studies, with his current focus being on topics such as racism, hate speech, populism and authoritarianism. He has published internationally on these topics in journals such as Discourse & Communication, Critical Discourse Studies, Journal of Language and Politics, Social Semiotics, Topoi, Informal Logic, Journal of Argumentation in Context. He is the Editor of the CADAAD Journal – Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines as well as sits at the Editorial Board of academic journals such as Argumentation (Springer) and Journal of Argumentation in Context (John Benjamins).

Janina Wildfeuer

(author)
Lecturer / Editor / Program Coordinator at University of Groningen
https://www.rug.nl/staff/j.wildfeuer/?lang=en

Dr Janina Wildfeuer is a multimodalist with a multi-faceted background in linguistics, semiotics, and discourse analysis. She has more than fifteen years of experience in working with visual and audiovisual communication and has built particular expertise in films and audiovisual data, comics, social media and games. In her position at the University of Groningen, Janina teaches classes on multimodality, digital communication, visual and audio-visual analysis, and works as programme coordinator of the Communication and Information Studies Master’s. She is also the Chief Editor of the journal 'Visual Communication', one of the key journals in the field of visual and multimodal communication, and Associate Editor for the speciality section 'Multimodality of Communication' with Frontiers in Communication. Janina has contributed to several edited collections and papers focused on the theoretical and methodological development of multimodality studies. Her work also provides valuable insights into corpus-analytical and empirically oriented projects on various media, including film, comics, and social media.

References
  1. Alkiviadou, Natalie, 2017. “Regulating hate speech in the EU”. In: Assimakopoulos Stavros et al. (eds), Online Hate Speech in the European Union: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective. Cham: Springer, 6–10.
  2. Assimakopoulos, Stavros, 2020. “Incitement to discriminatory hatred, illocution and perlocution”. Pragmatics and Society, 11 (2), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.18071.ass?locatt=mode:legacy
  3. ―, and Fabienne H. Baider, 2019. “Hate speech in online reactions to news articles in Cyprus and Greece”. In: Maria Chondrogianni, Simon Courtenage, Geoffrey Horrocks, Amalia Arvaniti and Ianthi Tsimpli (eds), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Greek Linguistics. London: University of Westminster, 398–406.
  4. ―, Fabienne H. Baider and Sharon Millar (eds), 2017. Online Hate Speech in the European Union: A Discourse-Analytic Perspective. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72604-5
  5. Baider, Fabienne H. and Maria Constantinou, 2020. “Covert hate speech: A contrastive study of Greek and Greek Cypriot online discussions with an emphasis on irony”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 8 (2), 262–287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00040.bai
  6. ―, Sharon Millar and Stavros Assimakopoulos (eds), 2020. “Hate speech: Definitions, interpretations and practices”. Pragmatics and Society, 11 (2), 171–335. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.11.2?locatt=mode:legacy
  7. Bateman, John and Janina Wildfeuer, 2014. “A multimodal discourse theory of visual narrative”. Journal of Pragmatics, 74, 180–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.10.001
  8. ―, Janina Wildfeuer and Tuomo Hippala, 2017. Multimodality: Foundations, Research and Analysis – A Problem-Oriented Introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110479898
  9. Brindle, Andrew, 2016. The Language of Hate: A Corpus Linguistic Analysis of White Supremacist Language. New York/London: Routledge.
  10. Carvalho, Paula, Danielle Caled, Cláudia Silva, Fernando Batista and Ricardo Ribeiro, 2023. “The expression of hate speech against Afro-descendant, Roma, and LGBTQ+ communities in YouTube comments”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00085.car
  11. Halliday, Michael A. K., 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Arnold.
  12. ―, and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen, 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd edn. London: Arnold.
  13. Hauser, Jakub and Eva Janáčová (eds), 2021. Visual Antisemitism in Central Europe: Imagery of Hatred. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110616415
  14. Jaki, Sylvia, Tom De Smedt, Maja Gwóźdź, Rudresh Panchal, Alexander Rossa and Guy De Pauw, 2019. “Online hatred of women in the Incels.me forum: Linguistic analysis and automatic detection”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 7 (2), 240–268. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00026.jak
  15. KhosraviNik, Majid and Eleonora Esposito, 2018. “Online hate, digital discourse and critique: Exploring digitally-mediated discursive practices of gender-based hostility”. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 14 (1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2018-0003
  16. Kopytowska, Monika, 2017. “Introduction”. In: Monika Kopytowska (ed.), Contemporary Discourses of Hate and Radicalism Across Space and Genres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.93.001ed?locatt=mode:legacy
  17. Kress, Gunther, 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.
  18. ―, and Theo van Leeuwen, 1996. Reading images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
  19. Pflaeging, Jana, Janina Wildfeuer and John A. Bateman (eds), 2021. Empirical Multimodality Research: Methods, Evaluations, Implications. Berlin: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110725001
  20. Pinto, Robert C., 2001. Argument, Inference and Dialectic: Collected Papers on Informal Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  21. Rigotti, Eddo and Sara Greco, 2019. Inference in Argumentation: A Topics-Based Approach to Argument Schemes. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04568-5
  22. Sellars, Andrew, 2016. Defining Hate Speech. Berkman Klein Center Research Publication No. 2016–20. Boston University School of Law. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2882244
  23. Serafis, Dimitris, 2022. “Unveiling the rationale of soft hate speech in multimodal artefacts”. Journal of Language and Discrimination, 6 (2), 321–346. https://doi.org/10.1558/jld.22363
  24. ―, 2023. Authoritarianism on the Front Page: Multimodal Discourse and Argumentation in Times of Multiple Crises in Greece. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.99
  25. ―, and Stavros Assimakopoulos, 2023. “’Let’s send them to desert islands’: Right-wing populist argumentation and hatred against migrants in Greece”. In: Bjørn Hamre and Lisa Villadsen (eds), Islands of Extreme Exclusion. Leiden: Brill, 83–103. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004688520_005
  26. ―, and Salomi Boukala, 2023. “Subtle hate speech and the recontextualisation of antisemitism online: Analysing argumentation on Facebook”. In: Eleonora Esposito and Majid KhosraviNik (eds), Discourse in the Digital Age. London: Routledge, 143–167. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003300786-10
  27. ―, Sara Greco, Chiara Pollaroli and Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria, 2020a. “Towards an integrated argumentative approach to multimodal critical discourse analysis: Evidence from the portrayal of refugees and immigrants in Greek newspapers”. Critical Discourse Studies, 17 (5), 545–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1701509
  28. ―, Sara Greco, Chiara Pollaroli and Chiara Jermini-Martinez Soria, 2020b. “Multimodal arguments in the mainstream press: Illustrating portrayals of migration”. OSSA12 Conference 2019, 1–14.
  29. ―, Irina Diana Madroane and Theodor Lalér, 2024. “Critical reconstructions of populist multimodal argumentation: Illustrations from right-wing parties’ Facebook posts on the Russo-Ukrainian refugee issue”. Journal of Argumentation in Context 13 (2), 232–259. https://doi.org/10.1075/jaic.00029.ser?locatt=mode:legacy
  30. ―, Carlo Raimondo, Stavros Assimakopoulos, Sara Greco and Andrea Rocci, 2021. “Argumentative dynamics in representations of migrants and refugees: Evidence from the Italian press during the ‘refugee crisis’”. Discourse & Communication, 15 (5), 559–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211017706
  31. ―, and Assimakis Tseronis, 2023. “The front page as a canvas for multimodal argumentation: Brexit in the Greek press”. Frontiers in Communication, 8, 1230632. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1230632
  32. ―, Franco Zappettini and Stavros Assimakopoulos, 2023. “The institutionalization of hatred politics in the Mediterranean: Studying corpora of online news portals during the European ‘refugee crisis’”. Topoi, 42 (2), 651–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-023-09890-w
  33. Soral, Wiktor, Michał Bilewicz and Mikołaj Winiewski, 2017. “Exposure to hate speech increases prejudice through desentization”. Aggressive Behavior, 44, 136–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21737
  34. Stöckl, Hartmut, 2024. “Fresh perspectives on multimodal argument reconstruction”. Frontiers in Communication. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1366182
  35. ―, and Jana Pflaeging, 2022. “Multimodal coherence revisited: Notes on the move from theory to data in annotating print advertisements”. Frontiers in Communication, 7, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.900994
  36. United Nations (2019). United Nations strategy and plan of action on hate speech. https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/advising-and-mobilizing/Action_plan_on_hate_speech_EN.pdf
  37. van Eemeren, Frans H., 2018. Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95381-6
  38. van Leeuwen, Theo, 2008. Discourse and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  39. Waldron, Jeremy, 2012. The Harm in Hate Speech. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  40. Way, Lyndon and Dimitris Serafis, 2023. “Scroll culture and authoritarian populism: How Turkish and Greek online news aggravate ‘refugee crisis’ tensions”. Critical Discourse Studies, 20 (6), 643–664. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2022.2156568
  41. Wildfeuer, Janina, 2014. Film Discourse Interpretation. Towards a New Paradigm for Multimodal Film Analysis. London: Routledge.
  42. ―, 2018. “It’s all about logics?! Analyzing the rhetorical structure of multimodal filmic text”. Semiotica, 220, 95–121. https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0139
  43. ―, and Chiara Pollaroli, 2017. “Seeing the untold. Multimodal argumentation in movie trailers”. In: Tseronis Assimakis and Charles Forceville (eds), Multimodal Argumentation and Rhetoric in Media Genres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 189–215. https://doi.org/10.1075/aic.14.08wil?locatt=mode:legacy
  44. ―, and Chiara Pollaroli, 2018. “When Context Changes: The Need for a Dynamic Notion of Context in Multimodal Argumentation”. International Review of Pragmatics, 10(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-01002003
  45. ―, and Dušan Stamenković, 2021. “An empirical multimodal approach to open-world video games”. In: Jana Pflaeging, Janina Wildfeuer and John A. Bateman (eds), Empirical Multimodality Research: Methods, Evaluations, Implications. Berlin: De Gruyter, 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110725001-011

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.1
  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
    • EBSCO Host
    • ProQuest Ebrary
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters

UK registered social enterprise and Community Interest Company (CIC).

Company registration 14549556

Metadata

  • By book
  • By publisher
  • GraphQL API
  • Export API

Thoth

  • About Us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Service status

Contact

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Mastodon
  • Github

Copyright © 2025 Thoth Open Metadata. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.