Skip to main content
  • Pricing
  • Policies
  • Support us
  • Login
Sign up
  1. Home
  2. Imagery of Hate Online
  3. 5. Same tools, different target: Countering hate speech with memes
Open Book Publishers

5. Same tools, different target: Countering hate speech with memes

  • Carmen Aguilera-Carnerero (author)
  • Matthias J. Becker(author)
  • Marcus Scheiber(author)
Chapter of: Imagery of Hate Online(pp. 79–106)
  • Export Metadata
  • Metadata
  • Locations
  • Contributors
  • References

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.1
  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
    • EBSCO Host
    • ProQuest Ebrary
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Metadata
Title5. Same tools, different target
SubtitleCountering hate speech with memes
ContributorCarmen Aguilera-Carnerero (author)
Matthias J. Becker(author)
Marcus Scheiber(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0447.05
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0447/chapters/10.11647/obp.0447.05
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
CopyrightCarmen Aguilera-Carnerero; Matthias J. Becker; Marcus Scheiber;
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2025-05-02
Long abstractWhile memes, as communication practices, are inherently pluralistic and designed to express diverse opinions, they can also be used to propagate hateful ideologies. This is largely due to their strategic dissemination within moderate milieus of the digital public sphere (Ebner 2023). As a result, memes can act as catalysts for harmful ideas, contributing to the normalisation of hate (Schulze et al. 2022: 42). However, the same mechanisms that enable the spread of hate speech can be repurposed by digital actors to promote counter-speech and resist this normalisation. This chapter explores the multimodal communication strategies used in counter-speech memes, with a particular focus on their role in combating Islamophobia.
Page rangepp. 79–106
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Locations
Landing PageFull text URLPlatform
PDFhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0447/chapters/10.11647/obp.0447.05Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0447.05.pdfFull text URL
HTMLhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0447/chapters/10.11647/obp.0447.05Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0447/ch5.xhtmlFull text URLPublisher Website
Contributors

Carmen Aguilera-Carnerero

(author)
Lecturer at Universidad de Granada
https://www.ugr.es/en/staff/maria-carmen-aguilera-carnerero

Dr Carmen Aguilera-Carnerero obtained her degree and Ph.D. at the department of English and German Philology at the University of Granada, Spain, where she currently teaches. Her post-doctoral research focused on the study of extreme speech online, especially on CyberIslamophobia, the online discourse of the post-war ethnic conflict in Sri Lanka, the cyberhetoric of the far-right, the semiotics of terrorism and the communicative force of graffiti. She authored the Spanish section of the European Islamophobia report in 2016, 2017, and 2018. She has been a guest speaker at the University of Munich, Charles II University in Prague, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore in Milan, at the European Foundation of Arab Studies, Casa Árabe in Madrid and the European Parliament, among others. She has spoken on her research topics for different national and international media.

Matthias J. Becker

(author)
Postdoc Researcher at University of Cambridge
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2847-4542

Dr Matthias J. Becker is a linguist specialising in pragmatics, cognitive linguistics, (critical) discourse analysis, and social media studies, with a particular emphasis on researching prejudice and hatred. He studied linguistics, philosophy, and literature at Freie Universität Berlin and has contributed to several research projects focusing on the use of language in political and media campaigns. For over twelve years, his research has focused on the analysis of implicit hate speech—often normalised within mainstream political discourse—and the underlying conditions that enable its emergence. Matthias is the creator and lead of the Decoding Antisemitism research project and Postdoc Researcher at the University of Cambridge and Technische Universität Berlin.

Marcus Scheiber

(author)
PhD Researcher at University of Vechta
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1714-2015

Marcus Scheiber is a discourse semiotician specialising in critical discourse analysis, internet linguistics, multimodal research and antisemitism research. He started his academic career at the Universities of Heidelberg and Bern, and as a visiting researcher and lecturer at the University of Mumbai. He received his MA from the University of Heidelberg in 2018 with a thesis about internet memes. He is currently working on a Ph.D. project at the University of Vechta and the University of Vienna, in which he is investigating how the communication format of memes is used for antisemitic communication strategies in the digital sphere.

References
  1. Aguilera-Carnerero, Carmen and Abdul-Halik Azeez, 2016. “‘Islamonausea, not Islamophobia’: the many faces of cyberhate speech”. Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research, 9 (1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1386/jammr.9.1.21_1
  2. ―, and Megara Tegal, 2023. “Multimodal Islamophobia. Gendered Stereotypes in memes”. Journal of Muslim and Media Research, 16 (2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1386/jammr_00063_1
  3. Akbarzadeh, Shahram and Bianca J. Smith, 2005. The Representation of Islam and Muslims in the Media (The Age and Herald Newspapers). Melbourne: Monash University.
  4. Allport, Gordon W., 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.
  5. Assimakopoulos, Stavros, 2020. “Incitement to discriminatory hatred, illocution and perlocution”. Pragmatics & Society, 11 (2), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.18071.ass?locatt=mode:legacy
  6. Askanius, Tina, 2021. “On Frogs, Monkeys, and Execution Memes: Exploring the Humour-Hate Nexus at the Intersection of Neo-Nazi and Alt-Right Movements in Sweden”. Television & New Media, 22, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420982234
  7. Awan, Imran, 2012. “‘I’m a Muslim not an Extremist’: How the prevent strategy has constructed a ‘Suspect Community’”. Politics & Policy, 40 (6), 1158–1185.
  8. Baider, Fabienne, 2023. “Accountability Issues, Online Covert Hate Speech, and the Efficacy of Counter‐Speech”. Politics and Governance, 11 (2), 249–260, https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i2.6465
  9. ―, and Maria Constantinou, 2020. “Covert hate speech: A contrastive study of Greek and Greek Cypriot online discussions with an emphasis on irony”. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 8 (2), 262–287, https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.00040.bai
  10. ―, Sarah Millar and Stavros Assimakopoulos, 2020. “Introduction: Defining, performing and countering hate speech”. Pragmatics & Society, 11 (2), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.11.2.01bai
  11. Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos and Tony McEnery, 2013. “Sketching Muslims: A corpus driven analysis of representations around the word ‘Muslim’ in the British press 1998–2009”. Applied Linguistics, 34 (3), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams048
  12. Becker, Matthias J., Hagen Troschke, Matthew Bolton and Alexis Chapelan (eds), 2024. Decoding Antisemitism: A Guide to Identifying Antisemitism Online. Cham/London: Springer Nature/Palgrave Macmillan, https://link.springer.com/book/9783031492372
  13. Benesch, Susan, 2016. “Considerations for Successful Counterspeech”. Dangerous Speech Project. https://dangerousspeech.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Considerations-for-Successful-Counterspeech.pdf
  14. Billig, Michael, 2001. “Humour and hatred: The racist jokes of the Ku Klux Klan”. Discourse & Society, 12, 267–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926501012003001
  15. Bogerts, Lisa and Maik Fielitz, 2019. “‘Do you Want Meme War?’ Understanding the Visual memes of the German Far Right”. In: Maik Fielitz and Nick Thurston (eds), Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right. Online Actions and Offline Consequences in Europe and the US. Bielefeld: Transcript, 137–154.
  16. Breitenbach, Patrick, 2015. “Memes. Das Web als kultureller Nährboden“. In: Patrick Breitenbach, Christian Stiegler, and Thomas Zorbach (eds), New Media Culture. Mediale Phänomene der Netzkultur. Bielefeld: Transcript, 29–49.
  17. Brontsema, Rhiannon, 2004. “A Queer Revolution: Reconceptualizing the Debate Over Linguistic Reclamation”. Colorado Research in Linguistics, 17 (1), 1–15.
  18. Brown, Andrew, 2017. “What Is Hate Speech? Part 1: The Myth of Hate”. Law and Philosophy, 36 (4), 419–468.
  19. ―, 2018. “What Is So Special About Online (as Compared to Offline) Hate Speech?” Ethnicities, 18 (3), 297–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968177098
  20. CERD (United Nations, International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination), 2013. General Recommendation No. 35: Combating Racist Hate Speech. https://www.refworld.org/legal/general/cerd/2013/en/101142
  21. Council of Europe, 1997. Council of Europe’s Committee of Ministers’ Recommendation No. R (97) 20, of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on “Hate Speech”. https://rm.coe.int/1680505d5b
  22. Crawford, Blyth, 2020. “The Influence of Memes in Far-Right Radicalisation”. CARR webpage.
  23. Dahinden, Urs, Carmen Koch, Vinzenz Wyss and Guido Keek, 2011. ”Representation of Islam and Christianity In the Swiss Media”. Journal of Empirical Theology, 24 (2), 197–208. https:// doi.org/10.1163/157092511X603983
  24. Davidson, Thomas, Dan Warmsley, Michael Macy and Ingmar Weber, 2017. “Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Language”. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Web and Social Media. Palo Alto: AAAI Press, 512–515. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14955
  25. Ebner, Julia, 2023. Going Mainstream: How Extremists Are Taking Over. London: Bonnier Books.
  26. ECRI (European Commission Against Racism and Intolerance), 2016. General Policy Recommendation No. 15 on Combating Hate Speech. https://www.coe.int/en/web/european-commission-against-racism-and-intolerance/recommendation-no.15
  27. Erikson, Erik H., 1968. Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: Norton & Company.
  28. Ermida, Isabel (ed.), 2023. Hate Speech in Social Media: Linguistic Approaches. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38248-2
  29. Farokhi, Zeinab, 2021. “Cyber Homo Sacer: A Critical Analysis of Cyber Islamophobiain the Wake of the Muslim Ban”. Islamophobia Studies Journal, 6 (1), 14–32.
  30. Felder, Ekkehard, 2006. „Semantische Kämpfe in Wissensdomänen. Eine Einführung in Benennungs- Bedeutungs- und Sachverhaltsfixierungs-Konkurrenzen“. In: Ekkehard Felder (ed.), Semantische Kämpfe. Macht und Sprache in den Wissenschaften. Berlin: De Gruyter, 13–46.
  31. Fielitz, Maik and Nick Thurston (eds), 2019. Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right. Online Actions and Offline Consequences in Europe and the US. Bielefeld: Transcript.
  32. Gal, Noam, 2019. “Ironic humour on social media as participatory boundary work”. New Media & Society, 21, 729–749. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444818805719
  33. Garland, Joshua, Keyan Ghazi-Zahedi, Jean-Gabriel Young, Laurent Hébert-Dufresne and Mirta Galesic, 2022. “Impact and dynamics of hate and counter speech online”. EPJ Data Science, 11, Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-021-00314-6
  34. Guillén-Nieto, Victoria, 2023. Hate Speech: Linguistic Perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter.
  35. Gray, Jonathan, Jeffrey P. Jones, and Ethan Thompson, 2009. “The state of satire, the satire of state”. In: Jonathan Gray, Jeffrey P. Jones and Ethan Thompson (eds), Satire TV: Politics and Comedy in the Post-Network Era. New York: New York University Press, 3–36.
  36. Greene, Viveka S., 2019. “’Deplorable’ satire: Alt-right memes, white genocide tweets, and redpilling normies”. Studies in American Humor, 5 (1), 31–69.
  37. Grundlingh, Lezandra, 2017. “Memes as speech acts”. Social Semiotics, 28 (2), 147–168.
  38. Hakoköngäs, Eemeli, Otto Halmesvaara and Inari Sakki, 2020. “Persuasion through bitter humour: Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Rhetoric in Internet Memes of Two far-right groups in Finland”. Social Media & Society, 6 (2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120921575
  39. Hangartner, Dominik, Gloria Gennaro, Sary Alasiri and Nicholas Bahrich, 2021. “Empathy-based counterspeech can reduce racist hate speech in a social media field experiment”. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 14; 118 (50), e2116310118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2116310118
  40. Henzell-Thomas, Jeremy. 2001. The Language of Islamophobia. Paper presented at the “Exploring Islamophobia” Conference at The University of Westminster School of Law, London, 29 September.
  41. Iedema, Rick, 2003. “Multimodality, resemiotization: extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice”. Visual Communication, 2 (1), 29–57.
  42. INACH (International Network Against Cyber Hate), 2024. “What is cyber hate and why do we want to counter it”. https://www.inach.net/cyber-hate-definitions
  43. Jakobson, Roman, 1960. “Linguistics and Poetics”. In: Thomas A. Sebeok (ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge: MIT Press, 350–377.
  44. Kelman, Herbert C., 1961. “Processes of Opinion Change”. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25 (1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1086/266996
  45. Klug, Nina-Maria, 2023. “Verstehen auf den ersten Blick – oder doch nicht? Zur (vermeintlichen) Einfachheit kleiner Texte am Beispiel von Internet-Memes“. In: Angela Schrott, Johanna Wolf, and Christine Pflüger (eds), Textkomplexität und Textverstehen. Berlin: De Gruyter, 195–230.
  46. Knobel, Michele and Colin Lankshear, 2006. “Online memes, affinities and cultural production”. In: Michele Knobel and Colin Lankshear (eds), A New Literacy Sampler. New York: Peter Lang, 199–227.
  47. Kress, Gunther, 2010. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge.
  48. ―, and Theo van Leeuwen, 2006 [1996]. Reading Images. The grammar of visual design. New York: Routledge.
  49. Kunst, Marlene, Pablo Porten-Cheé, Martin Emmer and Christiane Eilders, 2021. “Do ‘Good Citizens’ fight hate speech online? Effects of solidarity citizenship norms on user responses to hate comments”. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 18 (3), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2020.1871149
  50. Larsson, Göran, 2007. “Cyber-Islamophobia? The case of WikiIslam”. Contemporary Islam, 1 (1), 53–67. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-007-0002-2
  51. Matsuda, Mari J., 1989. “Public Response to Racist Speech. Considering the Victim’s Story”. Michigan Law Review, 87 (8), 2320−2381.
  52. May, Rob and Matthew Feldman, 2019. “Understanding the Alt-Right. Ideologues, ‘Lulz’ and Hiding in Plain Sight”. In: Maik Fielitz and Nick Thurston (eds), Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right. Online Actions and Offline Consequences in Europe and the US. Bielefeld: Transcript, 25199–22736.
  53. Meibauer, Jörg, 2013. Hassrede – von der Sprache zur Politik. In: Meibauer, Jörg (ed.), 2013. Hassrede/Hate Speech: Interdisziplinäre Beiträge zu einer aktuellen Diskussion. Gießen: Gießener Elektronische Bibliothek, 1–15. https://jlupub.ub.uni-giessen.de/items/daa10781-24f6-4cc9-978d-caf8ec8feee8
  54. Meier, Stefan, 2014. (Bild-)Diskurs im Netz. Konzept und Methode für eine semiotische Diskursanalyse im World Wide Web. Köln: Halem.
  55. Milner, Ryan M., 2013. “Media Lingua Franca: Fixity, Novelty, and Vernacular Creativity in Internet Memes”. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research, 14.0. https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/spir/article/view/8725
  56. Moore, Kerry, Paul Mason and Justin Lewis, 2008. The Representation of British Muslims in the National Print News Media 2000–2008. Cardiff: Cardiff School of Journalism, Media, and Cultural Studies.
  57. O’Driscoll, Joan, 2020. Offensive Language: Taboo, Offence and Social Control. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  58. Özarslan, Mehmet, 2014. “Introducing two new terms into the literature of hate speech, ‘hate discourse’ and ‘hate speech act’: Application of speech act theory to hate speech studies in the era of web 2.0”. Galatasaray Üniversitesi İletişim Dergisi, 20, 53–75.
  59. Pintak, Lawrence, Brian J. Bowe, and Jonathan Albright, 2021. “Influencers, Amplifiers, and Icons: A Systematic Approach to Understanding the Roles of Islamophobic Actors on Twitter”. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 99, 1–25.
  60. Saha, Punyajoy, Kiran Garimellab, Narla Komal Kalyana, Saurabh Kumar Pandeya, Pauras Mangesh Mehera, Binny Mathewa, and Animesh Mukherjee, 2023. “On the rise of fear speech in online social media”. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.10311
  61. Schäfer, Johannes and Elina Kistner, 2023. HS-EMO: Analyzing emotions in hate speech. Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS 2023). Association for Computational Linguistics, 165–173. https://aclanthology.org/2023.konvens-main.17.pdf
  62. Schäfer, Svenja, Isabella Rebasso, Ming M. Boyer and Anna M. Planitzer, 2024. “Can We Counteract Hate? Effects of Online Hate Speech and Counter Speech on the Perception of Social Groups”. Communication Research, 51 (5), 553–579. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502231201091
  63. Scheiber, Marcus, Troschke, Hagen and Krasni, Jan, 2024. Vom kommunikativen Phänomen zum gesellschaftlichen Problem: Wie Antisemitismus durch Memes viral wird. In: Susanne Kabatnik, Lars Bülow, Marie-Luis Merten and Robert Mroczynski (eds), Pragmatik multimodal (= Studien zur Pragmatik, Bd. 7), 257–284.
  64. Schulze, Heidi, Simon Greipl, Julian Hohner and Diana Rieger, 2022. “Zwischen Furcht und Feindseligkeit: Narrative Radikalisierungsangebote in Online-Gruppen”. In: Uwe Kemmesies, Peter Wetzels, Beatrix Austin, Christian Buscher, Axel Dessecker, Sven Hutter and Diana Rieger (eds), Motra-Monitor 2022. Wiesbaden: MOTRA Bundeskriminalamt – Forschungsstelle Terrorismus/Extremismus, 40–67.
  65. Schwarz-Friesel, Monika, 2021. Sprache und Emotion: Psycholinguistische Perspektiven. 2nd updated and expanded edn. Stuttgart: UTB.
  66. Segev, Elad, Asaf Nisenbaum, Solero Solero and Limor Shifman, 2015. “Families and Networks of Internet Memes: The Relationship between Cohesiveness, Uniqueness, and Quiddity Concreteness”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20 (4), 417–433.
  67. Shifman, Limor, 2014. Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  68. Silva, Cláudia, 2023. “Fighting Against Hate Speech: A Case for Harnessing Interactive Digital Counter-Narratives”. In: Lissa Holloway-Attaway and John T. Murray (eds), Interactive Storytelling. ICIDS 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14383. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47655-6_10
  69. Spitzmüller, Jürgen and Ingo Warnke, 2011. Diskurslinguistik. Eine Einführung in Theorien und Methoden der transtextuellen Sprachanalyse. Berlin: De Gruyter.
  70. Sponholz, Liriam, 2023. “Counter Speech: Practices of Contradiction on Hate Speech and their Effects”. In: Gisel Febel, Kerstin Knopf, and Martin Nonhoff (eds), Contradiction Studies – Exploring the Field. Contradiction Studies. Wiesbaden: Springer, 163–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37784-7_5
  71. Toffler, Alvin, 1980. The Third Wave. New York: Bantam.
  72. Topinka, Robert J., 2017. “Politically incorrect participatory media: Racist Nationalism on r/Imgoingtohellforthis”. New Media & Society, 20 (5), 2050–2069.
  73. UNESCO, 2021. “Education as a tool for prevention: addressing and countering hate speech, Expert meeting: 13-18 May 2020”. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379146
  74. UNESCO, 2023. “Addressing hate speech through education: A guide for policy makers”. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/addressing-hate-speech-through-education-guide-policy-makers
  75. Van Eerten, Jan-Jaap and Bertjan Doosje, 2019. Challenging Extremist Views on Social Media: Developing a Counter-Messaging Response. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429287145
  76. Warner, Michael and Julia Hirschberg, 2012. “Detecting Hate Speech on the World Wide Web”. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Language in Social Media. Montreal: Association for Computational Linguistics, 19–26. https://aclanthology.org/W12-2103.pdf
  77. Whittaker, Brian, 2002. “Islam and the British press after 9/11”. https://al-bab.com/ (full link to article no longer available).
  78. Wiggins, Bradley E., 2019. The Discourse Power of Memes in Digital Culture. Ideology, Semiotics and Intertextuality. London: Routledge.
  79. Wodak, Ruth, 2015. The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. Los Angeles: Sage.
  80. Yoon, Injeong, 2016. Why is it not a joke? Analysis of Internet memes associated with racism and hidden ideology of colourblindness. Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education, 33, 92–123.
  81. Zapata, Jimena, Justin Sulik, Clemens von Wulffen and Ophelia Deroy, 2024. “Bystanders’ collective responses set the norm against hate speech”. Humanit Soc Sci Commun, 11 (335). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02761-8
  82. Zappavigna, Michele, 2012. Discourse of Twitter and Social Media. How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London/New York: Continuum.

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.1
  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
    • EBSCO Host
    • ProQuest Ebrary
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters

UK registered social enterprise and Community Interest Company (CIC).

Company registration 14549556

Metadata

  • By book
  • By publisher
  • GraphQL API
  • Export API

Thoth

  • About Us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Service status

Contact

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Mastodon
  • Github

Copyright © 2025 Thoth Open Metadata. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.