Skip to main content
  • Pricing
  • Policies
  • Support us
  • Login
Sign up
  1. Home
  2. Imagery of Hate Online
  3. 6. Memefication of antisemitism: Antisemitic content on TikTok—a multimodal ethnographic analysis
Open Book Publishers

6. Memefication of antisemitism: Antisemitic content on TikTok—a multimodal ethnographic analysis

  • Mohamed Salhi (author)
  • Yasmine Goldhorn (author)
Chapter of: Imagery of Hate Online(pp. 107–152)
  • Export Metadata
  • Metadata
  • Locations
  • Contributors
  • References

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.1
  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
    • EBSCO Host
    • ProQuest Ebrary
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Metadata
Title6. Memefication of antisemitism
SubtitleAntisemitic content on TikTok—a multimodal ethnographic analysis
ContributorMohamed Salhi (author)
Yasmine Goldhorn (author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0447.06
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0447/chapters/10.11647/obp.0447.06
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
CopyrightMohamed Salhi; Yasmine Goldhorn;
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2025-05-02
Long abstractTikTok, currently the largest social media platform, is a breeding ground for various forms and types of hate speech, including antisemitism. This chapter addresses and analyses the concealment and survival of antisemitic content on TikTok through encoded semiotic, multimodal resources as a challenge to the existing regulations against hate speech on social media platforms. The article analyses the strategic concealment of antisemitic language as deployed in posts (i.e. memes and visual humour) and comments on TikTok, and suggests that antisemitic content is concealed using encrypted, multi-layered, and suggestive language (i.e. dog whistles) in both textual and symbolic forms. Moreover, this chapter surveys a significant array of semiotic modes, including textual, iconographic, visual, and auditory resources to examine the strategically, and seemingly ‘humorous,’ ‘memetic,’ and ‘creative’ ways of producing and maintaining antisemitic content. The memefication of antisemitic content, this chapter further argues, contributes to the concealment, banalisation, and normalisation of exclusion of and hatred against Jews. To systematically survey and analyse encoded antisemitism in TikTok memes and understand its primary trends, means of survival, and the banalisation of hate, this chapter employs mixed methods of Multimodal Discourse Analysis (MMDA) and Online Ethnography.[ During the course of conducting this research, many of the antisemitic expressions and resources have been banned from TikTok, particularly after the surge of antisemitic content following the attacks on 7 October 2023 and the following events. After receiving an open letter (https://www.deartiktok.com) asking TikTok to do more to protect Jewish users against rising antisemitism, TikTok declared that they made an additional effort to delete content violating their rules on hateful behaviour and therefore globally removed 730,000 videos between 7 October and 31 October 2023 (TikTok 2023). ]
Page rangepp. 107–152
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Locations
Landing PageFull text URLPlatform
PDFhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0447/chapters/10.11647/obp.0447.06Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0447.06.pdfFull text URL
HTMLhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0447/chapters/10.11647/obp.0447.06Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0447/ch6.xhtmlFull text URLPublisher Website
Contributors

Mohamed Salhi

(author)
Lecturer / Researcher at Goethe University Frankfurt
https://www.fb03.uni-frankfurt.de/129559823/Mohamed_Salhi

Dr Mohamed Salhi is a researcher and lecturer at the institute of Political Science, Goethe University in Frankfurt, specialising in critical discourse analysis, far-right populism, crisis discourse, and visual politics.

Yasmine Goldhorn

(author)
Research Assistant at Goethe University Frankfurt
https://www.uni-frankfurt.de/117681293/Yasmine_Goldhorn

Yasmine Goldhorn is a master’s graduate in Sociology and a research assistant with the “RelcoDiff” research project. Her research interests broadly concern institutional antisemitism, antisemitism among teenagers, and gender inequality in labour markets.

References
  1. Askanius, Tina and Nadine Keller, 2021. “Murder fantasies in memes: fascist aesthetics of death threats and the banalization of white supremacist violence”. Information, Communication & Society, 24 (16), 2522–2539, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1974517
  2. Bainotti, Lucia, Sarah Burkhardt, Yan Cong, Jingyi Zhu, Jesper Lust, Kate Babin, Salma Esserghini, Iliass Ayaou, Amine Kerboute, Micky L. Mocombe, Frédéric Lecat, Amina Mohamed, Simran Tamber, Devin Mitter, Sama K. Ooryad, Jasmin Leech, Tommaso Elli and Kristen Zheng, 2022. Tracing the Genealogy and Change of TikTok Audio Memes. Digital Methods Winter School, University of Amsterdam.
  3. Bhat, Prashanth and Ofra Klein, 2020. “Covert hate speech: white nationalists and dog whistle communication on Twitter”. In: Gwen Bouvier and Judith E. Rosenbaum (eds), Twitter, the Public Sphere, and the Chaos of Online Deliberation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 151–172.
  4. Bhatia, Tej K., 2018. “Accent, intelligibility, mental health, and trauma”. World Englishes, 37 (3), 421–431. https://10.1111/weng.12329
  5. Billig, Michael, 2001. “Humour and hatred: the racist jokes of the Ku Klux Klan”. Discourse & Society, 12 (3), 276–289.
  6. Bliuc, Ana-Maria, Nicholas Faulkner, Andrew Jakubowicz and Craig McGarty, 2018. “Online networks of racial hate: A systematic review of 10 years of research on cyber-racism”. Computers in Human Behavior, 87, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.026
  7. Brandeis Magazine, 2022. “Code Words and Crumbs: Deciphering QAnon Messaging”. Brandeis Magazine. https://www.brandeis.edu/magazine/2022/summer/inquiry/qanon.html
  8. Breidenstein, Georg, Stefan Hirschauer, Herbert Kalthoff and Boris Nieswand, 2020. Ethnographie. Die Praxis der Feldforschung. München: UVK Verlag.
  9. Canale, Germán, 2023. A Multimodal and Ethnographic Approach to Textbook Discourse. London: Routledge.
  10. Chevrette, Roberta and Christopher M. Duerringer, 2020. “Bros Before Donald Trump: Resisting and Replicating Hegemonic Ideologies in the #BROTUS Memes After the 2016 Election”. In: Gwen Bouvier and Judith E. Rosenbaum (eds), Twitter, The Public Sphere, and the Chaos of Online Deliberation. Cham: Springer, 235–266.
  11. DeCook, Julia R., 2018. “Memes and symbolic violence: #proudboys and the use of memes for propaganda and the construction of collective identity”. Learning, Media and Technology, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1544149
  12. Dellwing, Michael, Alessandro Tietz and Marc A. Vreca, 2021. Digitaler Naturalismus: Grundlagen der Ethnografie in der Onlineforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer.
  13. Dicks, Bella, Bambo Soyinka and Aamanda Coffey, 2006. “Multimodal ethnography”. Qualitative Research, 6 (1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794106058876
  14. Donovan, Joan, Becca Lewis and Brian Friedberg, 2019. “Parallel Ports. Sociotechnical Change from the Alt-Right to Alt-Tech”. In: Maik Fielitz and Nick Thurston (eds), Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right. Online Actions and Offline Consequences in Europe and the US. Bielefeld: Transcript, 49–66.
  15. Dundes, Alan and Thomas Hauschild, 1983. “Auschwitz Jokes”. Western Folklore, 42 (4), 249–260.
  16. Ebner, Julia, 2019. “Counter-Creativity: Innovative Ways to Counter Far-Right Communication Tactics”. In: Maik Fielitz and Nick Thurston (eds), Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right. Online Actions and Offline Consequences in Europe and the US. Bielefeld: Transcript, 169–182.
  17. Greene, Viveca S., 2019. “‘Deplorable’ Satire: Alt-Right Memes, White Genocide Tweets, and Redpilling Normies”. Studies in American Humor, 5 (1), 31–69.
  18. Guillén-Nieto, V., 2023. “DISMANTLING HATE SPEECH: TIME FOR LINGUISTS TO STEP UP”. Degruyter, 14 April. https://blog.degruyter.com/dismantling-hate-speech-time-for-linguists-to-step-up/
  19. Guy, Jean S., 2019. “Digital Technology, Digital Culture and Metric/Nonmetric Distinction”. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 55–61.
  20. Harriman, Nigel, Neil Shortland, Ma Su, Tyler Cote, Marcia. A. Testa and Elena Savoia, 2020. “Youth Exposure to Hate in the Online Space: An Exploratory Analysis”. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17 (22), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228531
  21. Hübscher, Monika and Sabine von Mering, 2022. Antisemitism on Social Media. London: Routledge Publications.
  22. Hawley, George, 2017. Making Sense of the Alt-Right. New York: Columbia University Press.
  23. Hine, Christine, 2015. Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied, and Everyday. New York: Routledge.
  24. IHRA, 2016. “Working definition of antisemitism”. International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance. https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism
  25. Kress, Gunther, 1993. “Against arbitrariness: the social production of the sign as a foundational issue in critical discourse analysis”. Discourse & Society, 4 (2, Special Issue: Critical Discourse Analysis), 169–191.
  26. ―, and Theo van Leeuwen, 2001. Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
  27. Lemke, Jay L., 1995. Textual Politics: Discourse and Social Dynamics. London: Taylor and Francis.
  28. LeVine, Philip and Ron Scollon, 2004. “Multimodal Discourse Analysis as the Confluence of Discourse and Technology”. In: Philip LeVine and Ron Scollon (eds), Discourse and Technology: Multimodal Discourse Analysis. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, 1–6.
  29. Machin, David and Andrea Mayr, 2012. How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage.
  30. Martin, Rod A. and Thomas E. Ford, 2018. The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. Oxford: Academic Press.
  31. May, Rob and Matthew Feldman, 2019. “Understanding the Alt-Right: Ideologues, ‘Lulz’ and Hiding in Plain Sight”. In: Maik Fielitz and Nick Thurston (eds), Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right. Online Actions and Offline Consequences in Europe and the US. Bielefeld: Transcript, 25–36.
  32. McKerrell, Simon and Lyndon C. Way, 2017. “Understanding Music as Multimodal Discourse”. In: Lyndon C. Way and Simon McKerrell (eds), Music as Multimodal Discourse: Semiotics, Power and Protest. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 1–20.
  33. McNamee, Lacy. G., Britanny L. Peterson, and Jorge Peña, 2010. “A Call to Educate, Participate, Invoke and Indict: Understanding the Communication of Online Hate Groups”. Communication Monographs, 77 (2), 257–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751003758227
  34. Meddaugh, Priscilla M. and Jack Kay, 2009. “Hate Speech or ‘Reasonable Racism?’ The Other in Stormfront”. Journal of Mass Media Ethics: Exploring Questions of Media Morality, 24 (4), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900520903320936
  35. Menon, Pratiksha T., 2023a, “Racist Humor: Explanatory Readings”. Jstor Daily, 18 August. https://daily.jstor.org/racist-humor-exploratory-readings/
  36. Menon, Pratiksha T., 2023b, “No Joke: Using humor to mask and normalize hatred and bigotry has a long, ugly history”. Jstor Daily, 30 August. https://daily.jstor.org/no-joke/
  37. Messerschmidt, Astrid, 2010. “Flexible Feindbilder -Antisemitismus und der Umgang mit Minderheiten in der deutschen Einwanderungsgesellschaft”. In: Wolfram Stender, Guido Follert and Mihri Özdogan (eds), Konstellationen des Antisemitismus. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 9–108.
  38. Miller-Idriss, Cynthia, 2017. The Extreme Gone Mainstream: Commercialization and Far Right Youth Culture in Germany. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  39. ―, 2019. “What Makes a Symbol Far Right? Co-opted and Missed Meanings in Far-Right Iconography”. In: Maik Fielitz and Nick Thurston (eds), Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right. Online Actions and Offline Consequences in Europe and the US. Bielefeld: Transcript, 123–137.
  40. Milner, Ryan M., 2012. The World Made Meme: Discourse and Identity in Participatory Media [PhD Dissertation]. University of Kansas.
  41. New York Times, 2023. “TikTok Pushes Back Against Claims It Fuels Antisemitism”. New York Times, 2 November. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/02/business/tiktok-antisemitism-claims-israel-palestinians.html
  42. Önnerfors, Andreas, 2018. ’Finspång’ – An Execution Meme of the Swedish Radical Right Ignites the Political Discourse. Center for Analysis of the Radical Right, 6 July. https://www.radicalrightanalysis.com/2018/07/06/fins
  43. Parekh, Bhikhu, 2012. “Is There a Case for Banning Hate Speech?” In: Michael Herz and Peter Molnar (eds), The Content and Context of Hate Speech: Rethinking Regulation and Responses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 37–56.
  44. Peck, Andrew, 2017. “The Memetic Vernacular: Everyday Arguments in the Digital Age”. [Dissertation] University of Wisconsin-Madison Digital Library. https://search.library.wisc.edu/digital/AJ4NABMHUJVLXF9B
  45. Pérez, Raúl, 2017. “Racism without Hatred? Racist Humor and the Myth of ‘Color-blindness’”. Sociological Perspectives, 60 (5, Special Issue: New Frontiers in the Study of Colorblind Racism), 956–974. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121417719699
  46. ―, 2022. The Souls of White Jokes: How Racist Humor Fuels White Supremacy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  47. Pflaeging, Jana, John A. Bateman and Janina Wildfeuer, 2021. “Empirical Multimodality Research: The State of Play”. In: Jana Pflaeging, John A. Bateman and Janina Wildfeuer (eds), Empirical Multimodality Research: Methods, Evaluations, Implications. Berlin: De Gruyter, 3–34.
  48. Saint-Amand, Pierre and Jennifer C. Gage, 1994. “Terrorizing Marie Antoinette”. Critical Inquiry, 20 (3), 379–400.
  49. Schnabel, Deborah and Eva Berendsen, 2024. Report #Nahostkonflikt. Die TikTok-Intifada - Der 7. Oktober und die Folgen im Netz. Analysen und Empfehlungen der Bildungsstätte Anne Frank.
  50. Shifman, Limor, 2013. “Memes in a Digital World: Reconciling with a Conceptual Troublemaker”. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 18 (3), 362–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12013
  51. ―, 2014. Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  52. Strick, Simon, 2021. Rechte Gefühle. Bielefeld: Transcript.
  53. Suk, Julie C., 2012. “Denying Experience: Holocaust Denial and the Free-Speech Theory of the State”. In: Michael Herz and Peter Molnar (eds), The Content and Context of Hate Speech: Rethinking Regulation and Responses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 144–163.
  54. TikTok, 2023. “The Truth About TikTok Hashtags and Content During the Israel-Hamas War”. https://newsroom.tiktok.com/en-us/the-truth-about-tiktok-hashtags-and-content-during-the-israel-hamas-war
  55. Torices, José R., 2021. “Understanding Dogwhistles Politics”. Theoria, 36 (3), 231–339. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.22510
  56. Tuters, Marc, 2019. “LARPing & Liberal Tears: Irony, Belief and Idiocy in the Deep Web Vernacular”. In: Maik Fielitz and Nick Thurston (eds), Post-Digital Cultures of the Far Right. Online Actions and Offline Consequences in Europe and the US. Bielefeld: Transcript, 37–48.
  57. Van Leeuwen, Theo, 2004. “Ten Reasons Why Linguists Should Pay Attention to Visual Communication”. In: Philip LeVine and Ron Scollon (eds), Discourse and Technology: Multimodal Discourse Analysis. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, 7–19.
  58. WSJ, 2021. “Investigation: How TikTok’s Algorithm Figures Out Your Deepest Desires”. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/video/series/inside-tiktoks-highly-secretive-algorithm/investigation-how-tiktok-algorithm-figures-out-your-deepest-desires/6C0C2040-FF25-4827-8528-2BD6612E3796
  59. Weaver, Simon, 2011. “Jokes, rhetoric and embodied racism: a rhetorical discourse analysis of the logics of racist jokes on the internet”. Ethnicities, 11 (4), 413–435.
  60. Weimann, Gabriel and Natalie Masri, 2022. “New Antisemitism on TikTok”. In: Monika Hübscher and Sabine von Mering (eds), Antisemitism on Social Media. Milton Park: Taylor and Francis, 167–180.
  61. Wiggins, Bradley E., 2019. The Discursive Power of Memes in Digital Culture: Ideology, Semiotics, and Intertextuality. London: Routledge.

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.1
  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
    • EBSCO Host
    • ProQuest Ebrary
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters

UK registered social enterprise and Community Interest Company (CIC).

Company registration 14549556

Metadata

  • By book
  • By publisher
  • GraphQL API
  • Export API

Thoth

  • About Us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Service status

Contact

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Mastodon
  • Github

Copyright © 2025 Thoth Open Metadata. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.