Skip to main content
  • Pricing
  • Policies
  • Support us
  • Login
Sign up
  1. Home
  2. Imagery of Hate Online
  3. 4. Extremist internet memes as a means of persuasion:: A visual rhetorical approach
Open Book Publishers

4. Extremist internet memes as a means of persuasion:: A visual rhetorical approach

  • Eemeli Hakoköngäs (author)
  • Otto Halmesvaara (author)
Chapter of: Imagery of Hate Online(pp. 57–78)
  • Export Metadata
  • Metadata
  • Locations
  • Contributors
  • References

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.1
  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
    • EBSCO Host
    • ProQuest Ebrary
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Metadata
Title4. Extremist internet memes as a means of persuasion:
SubtitleA visual rhetorical approach
ContributorEemeli Hakoköngäs (author)
Otto Halmesvaara (author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0447.04
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0447/chapters/10.11647/obp.0447.04
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
CopyrightEemeli Hakoköngäs; Otto Halmesvaara;
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2025-05-02
Long abstractThis chapter provides an overview of a qualitative rhetorical analysis of internet memes created and disseminated by various extremist groups. We will address the rhetorical nature of memes and provide practicable steps for applying visual rhetorical analysis to unravel their persuasive content, form, and functions. Our approach will be illustrated through the analysis of a communication by the Finnish branch of the Nordic Resistance Movement (NRM). With a view to providing tools for future researchers studying internet memes, we will consider the limitations of rhetorical analysis and the ethical and copyright issues associated with the gathering and use of internet memes as research material. As its key message, this chapter suggests that paying attention to the visuality of communication is necessary in order to unravel the persuasive nature of memes. While internet memes are typically bound to a certain cultural context (e.g. Finland, Scandinavia), they can simultaneously act as an intercultural means of persuasion (e.g. across European extremist movements). Understanding the immediate rhetorical function of memes requires placing them in the specific context of political and societal discussion in which they were published. Defining the broader ideological work carried out by memes requires delving into their roots and their use in different contexts.
Page rangepp. 57–78
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Locations
Landing PageFull text URLPlatform
PDFhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0447/chapters/10.11647/obp.0447.04Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0447.04.pdfFull text URL
HTMLhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0447/chapters/10.11647/obp.0447.04Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0447/ch4.xhtmlFull text URLPublisher Website
Contributors

Eemeli Hakoköngäs

(author)
Lecturer at University of Helsinki
https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/fi/persons/juho-eemeli-hakok%C3%B6ng%C3%A4s

Dr Eemeli Hakoköngäs (D.Soc.Sci, Title of Docent) is a university lecturer in social psychology at the University of Helsinki, Finland. In his research, Hakoköngäs has focused on history politics, political psychology, and visual rhetoric in the Finnish context.

Otto Halmesvaara

(author)
Doctoral Researcher at University of Helsinki
https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/fi/persons/otto-halmesvaara

Otto Halmesvaara (M.Soc.Sci) is a doctoral researcher in social psychology at the University of Helsinki, Finland. Halmesvaara has studied far-right rhetoric, as well as topics such as shame and morality. In his forthcoming doctoral thesis, he addresses lay attitudes towards health information obtained from genetics.

References
  1. APA, 2020. “Publication manual of the American psychological association”. American Psychological Association.
  2. Askanius, T. and Nadine K., 2021. “Murder fantasies in memes: fascist aesthetics of death threats and the banalization of white supremacist violence”. Information, Communication & Society 24 (16), 2522–2539. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1974517
  3. Bilewicz, M. and W. Soral, 2020. “Hate speech epidemic: The dynamic effects of derogatory language on intergroup relations and political radicalization”. Political Psychology, 41 (S1), 3–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12670
  4. Burke, S. and S. Goodman, 2012. “’Bring back Hitler’s gas chambers’: Asylum seeking, Nazis and Facebook–a discursive analysis”. Discourse and Society, 23 (1), 19–33.
  5. Davidson, B. I., D. Wischerath, D. Racek, D. A. Parry, E. Godwin, J. Hinds and A. G. Cork, 2023. “Platform-controlled social media APIs threaten open science”. Nature Human Behaviour, 7 (12), 2054–2057. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01750-2
  6. Davis, C., M. Glantz and D. Novak, 2016. “’You Can’t Run Your SUV on Cute. Let’s Go!’: Internet Memes as Delegitimizing Discourse”. Environmental Communication, 10 (1), 62–83.
  7. Dawkins, R., 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press.
  8. DeCook, J. R., 2018. “Memes and symbolic violence: #proudboys and the use of memes for propaganda and the construction of collective identity”. Learning, Media and Technology, 43 (4), 485–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1544149
  9. Ekman, M., 2018. “Anti-refugee mobilization in social media: The case of soldiers of Odin”. Social Media + Society, 4, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118764431
  10. Forchtner, B., and C. Kølvraa, 2017. “Extreme right images of radical authenticity: Multimodal aesthetics of history, nature, and gender roles in social media”. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 4 (3), 252–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2017.1322910
  11. Foss, S. K., 2005. “Theory of visual rhetoric”. In: K. Smith, S. Moriarty, G. Barbatsis and K. Kennedy (eds), Handbook of Visual Communication: Theory, Methods, and Media. Routledge, 141–152.
  12. Gal, N., 2019. “Ironic humor on social media as participatory boundary work”. New Media and Society, 21 (3), 729–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818805719
  13. ―, Shifman L. and Z. Kampf, 2016. “’It gets better’: Internet memes and the construction of collective identity”. New Media & Society, 18, 1698–1714. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814568784
  14. Hahner, L. A., 2013. “The riot kiss: Framing memes as visual argument”. Argumentation and Advocacy, 49, 151–166.
  15. Hakoköngäs, E. and Inari Sakki, 2019. “The past as a means of persuasion: Visual political rhetoric in Finnish dairy product advertising”. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 7, 507–524. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v7i1.1107
  16. ―, and Inari Sakki, 2023. “Multimodal nationalist rhetoric in Finland: From banal to extreme political persuasion”. In: W., Wei, and J., Schnell (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Descriptive Rhetorical Studies and World Languages. London: Routledge, 234–248. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003195276
  17. ―, O. Halmesvaara, J. Martikainen, and Inari Sakki, 2024. “Meemit ja fasismin estetiikka: Visuaalinen retorinen analyysi Pohjoismaisen Vastarintaliikkeen viestinnästä Suomessa. [Memes and the aesthetics of fascism: A visual rhetorical analysis of the Internet memes of the Finnish branch of the Nordic Resistance Movement]”. Kulttuurintutkimus, 1 (41), 41–59.
  18. ―, O. Halmesvaara, and Inari Sakki, 2020. “Persuasion through bitter humor: Multimodal discourse analysis of rhetoric in internet memes of two far-right groups in Finland”. Social Media + Society, 6 (2), 2056305120921575. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120921575
  19. Hatakka, N., 2020. “Expose, debunk, ridicule, resist! Networked civic monitoring of populist radical right online action in Finland”. Information, Communication & Society, 23 (9), 1311–1326. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1566392
  20. Horsti, K., 2015. “Techno-cultural opportunities: The anti-immigration movement in the Finnish mediascape”. Patterns of Prejudice, 49 (4), 343–366.
  21. Huntington, H. E., 2013. “Subversive memes: Internet memes as a form of visual rhetoric”. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research, 3. https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/spir/article/view/8886
  22. ―, 2016. “Pepper spray cop and the American dream: Using synecdoche and metaphor to unlock internet memes’ visual political rhetoric”. Communication Studies, 67 (1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2015.1087414
  23. Hübscher, M., 2023. “Algorithmic Antisemitism on Social Media”. In: M. Weitzman, R. J. Williams and Wald, J. (eds), The Routledge History of Antisemitism. London: Routledge, 364–372.
  24. Jenkins, E., 2014. “The modes of visual rhetoric: Circulating memes as expressions”. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 100 (4), 442–466.
  25. Kelly, N., 2023. “A Critical Analysis: Key Strategies of Far-Right Online Visual Propaganda”. In: R. Montasari (ed.), “Applications for Artificial Intelligence and Digital Forensics in National Security”. Springer, 127–141.
  26. Kilby, L. and H. Lennon, 2021. “When words are not enough: Combined textual and visual multimodal analysis as a critical discursive psychology undertaking”. Methods in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metip.2021.100071
  27. King, G., J. Pan, and M. E. Roberts, 2017. “How the Chinese government fabricates social media posts for strategic distraction, not engaged argument”. American Political Science Review, 111 (3), 484–501. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000144
  28. Knobel, M. and C. Lankshear, 2006. “Online memes, affinities and cultural production”. In: C. Bingum and M. Peters (eds), A new literacy sampler. Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 199–227.
  29. Kracauer, S., 1995. The mass ornament. Weimar essays [Ornament der Masse, 1963]. Translated by Thomas Y. Levin. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  30. Kress, G. and T. van Leeuwen, 2006. Reading Images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
  31. ―, and T. van Leeuwen, 2002. “Colour as a semiotic mode: Notes for a grammar of colour”. Visual Communication, 1 (3), 343–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/147035720200100306
  32. Livingstone, S., 2003. The changing nature of audiences: From the mass audience to the interactive media user. A companion to media studies. New York: Wiley & Sons, 337–359.
  33. Lu, Y. and J. Pan, 2021. “Capturing clicks: How the Chinese government uses clickbait to compete for visibility”. Political Communication, 38 (1–2), 23–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1765914
  34. Malmqvist, K., 2015. “Satire, racist humour and the power of (un)laughter: On the restrained nature of Swedish online racist discourse targeting EU-migrants begging for money”. Discourse and Society, 26 (6), 733–753.
  35. Martikainen, J. and Inari Sakki, 2021. “Myths, the Bible, and Romanticism as ingredients of political narratives in Finns Party election video”. Discourse, Context & Media 39, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100466
  36. Merrill, S., 2023. “Memory, Iconicity, and Virality in Action: Exploring Protest Photos Online”. In A. Rigney and S. Thomas (eds), The Visual Memory of Protest. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 133–156. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.5610579
  37. Mihelj, S. and C. Jiménez‐Martínez, 2021. ”Digital nationalism: Understanding the role of digital media in the rise of ‘new’ nationalism”. Nations and Nationalism, 27 (2), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12685
  38. Mosse, G. L., 1999. “Aesthetics and society: Some considerations”. Journal of Contemporary History, 31 (2), 245–252.
  39. Perelman, C., 1979. “The new rhetoric: A theory of practical reasoning”. In: C. Perelman (ed.), The New Rhetoric and the Humanities. Berlin: Springer, 1–42.
  40. Ranta, M., 2016. “The (pictorial) construction of collective identities in the Third Reich”. Language and Semiotic Studies, 2 (3), 107–124.
  41. ―, 2017. “Master narratives and the pictorial construction of Otherness: Anti-Semitic images in the Third Reich and beyond”. Contemporary Aesthetics, 15 (1), Article 25.
  42. Ravndal, J. A., 2020. “The Emergence of Transnational Street Militancy: A Comparative Case Study of the Nordic Resistance Movement and Generation Identity”. Journal for Deradicalization, 25, 1–34.
  43. Rose, G., 2016. Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials. California: Sage.
  44. Sakki, Inari and E. Hakoköngäs, 2022. “Dialogical construction of hate speech in established media and online discussions”. In: K. Pettersson and E. Nortio (eds), The Far-Right Discourse of Multiculturalism in Intergroup Interactions: A Critical Discursive Perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 85–111. http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89066-7_4
  45. ―, E. Hakoköngäs, and K. Pettersson, 2018. “Past and Present Nationalist Political Rhetoric in Finland: Changes and Continuities”. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 37, 160–180. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0261927X17706945
  46. Shifman, Limor, 2014. Memes in digital culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  47. ―, 2013. “Memes in a digital world: Reconciling with a conceptual troublemaker”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18 (3), 362–377.
  48. Thorleifsson, C., 2021. “From cyberfascism to terrorism: On 4chan/pol/ culture and the transnational production of memetic violence”. Nations and Nationalism, 28 (1), 286–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12780
  49. Yoon, I., 2016. “Why is it not just a joke? Analysis of Internet memes associated with racism and hidden ideology of colorblindness”. Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education, 33 (1), 92–123.
  50. Young, J. E., 2009. “Nazi aesthetics in historical context”. In: R. Clifton Spargo and Robert M. Ehrenreich (eds), After Representation? The Holocaust, Literature, and Culture. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press, 89–98.

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.1
  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
    • EBSCO Host
    • ProQuest Ebrary
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters

UK registered social enterprise and Community Interest Company (CIC).

Company registration 14549556

Metadata

  • By book
  • By publisher
  • GraphQL API
  • Export API

Thoth

  • About Us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Service status

Contact

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Mastodon
  • Github

Copyright © 2025 Thoth Open Metadata. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.