Skip to main content
Open Book Publishers

19. Imagination and justice: Teaching the future(s) of higher education through Africanfuturist speculative fiction

Chapter of: Higher Education for Good: Teaching and Learning Futures(pp. 445–472)

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Metadata
Title19. Imagination and justice
SubtitleTeaching the future(s) of higher education through Africanfuturist speculative fiction
ContributorFelicitas Macgilchrist(author)
Eamon Costello(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0363.19
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0363/chapters/10.11647/obp.0363.19
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
CopyrightFelicitas Macgilchrist, Eamon Costello
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2023-10-25
Long abstractHow might inclusion, equity, justice, care and sustainability be set to glimmer in higher education? This chapter draws on educational theory, critical research, and storytelling - in particular Africanfuturist science fiction - to dream new educational interfaces that are oriented for good. The chapter first maps out a 15 week course where students study the Africanfuturist science fiction novella Binti before writing their own storied futures for higher education in response. In the second half of the chapter another voice takes up the pen to imagine they are a student taking the course, and thus speculatively enact it. The chapter aims to open spaces for students and lecturers to: reflect on their (our) own positions in the academy, to critique the reproduction of classed, raced, gendered inequities in higher education through the encroachments of automation and platformisation, but then to generate futures that are oriented to justice.
Page rangepp. 445–472
Print length28 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Contributors

Felicitas Macgilchrist

(author)
Professor of Digital Education and Schools at University of Oldenburg
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2828-4127

Felicitas Macgilchrist is Professor of Digital Education and Schools at the University of Oldenburg (Germany). Her research explores the cultural politics of educational technology, taking up critical and speculative approaches. She is currently thinking about how design justice can be centred in edtech development, school practice and public discourse. She is co-editor of Learning, Media and Technology and toots occasionally at @discoursology@social.coop.

Eamon Costello

(author)
Associate Professor, Digital Learning at Dublin City University
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2775-6006
https://www.dcu.ie/researchsupport/research-profile?person_id=14193#tab-research

Eamon Costello is an associate professor of Digital Learning in Dublin City University (Ireland). He is deeply curious about the ways in which we can actively shape our world so that we can have better and more humane places where we can think, work, live and learn. He is an advocate of using the right tool for the job or sometimes none at all, for not everything can be fixed or should be built.

References
  1. Amiel, T., Pezzo, T., Cruz, L. R. da, & Oliveira, L. A. (2021). Os modos de adesão e a abrangência do capitalismo de vigilância na educação brasileira. Perspectiva, 39(3), 1–22.
  2. https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-795X.2021.e80582
  3. Andreotti, V. O. de, Stein, S., Suša, R., Čajkova, T., d’Emilia, D., Jimmy, E., Calhoun, B., Amsler, S., Cardoso, C., Siwek, D., & Fay, K. (2019). Gesturing towards decolonial futures global citizenship otherwise study program.
  4. https://decolonialfutures.net.
  5. Anonymous Author. (2016). Data colonialism: Critiquing consent and control in “Tech for social change”. Model View Culture, 43.
  6. https://modelviewculture.com/pieces/data-colonialism-critiquing-consent-and-control-in-tech-for-social-change
  7. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
  8. Bayne, S. (2015). Teacherbot: Interventions in automated teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(4), 455–67.
  9. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2015.1020783
  10. Beer, D. (2018). The data gaze: Capitalism, power and perception. Sage.
  11. Benjamin, R. (2019). Race after technology. Polity.
  12. Bernard, T. (2021). From didactics to datafication: A critical reflection on virtual learning environments and the production of space. Journal for Students Affairs in Africa, 9(1), 197–204.
  13. https://doi.org/10.24085/jsaa.v9i1.1438
  14. Bock, A., Breiter, A., Hartong, S., Jarke, J., Jornitz, S., Lange, A., & Macgilchrist, F. (Eds), (2023). Die datafizierte Schule. Springer.
  15. Brookfield, S. D., & Preskill, S. (2005). Discussion as a Way of Teaching: Tools and
  16. Techniques for Democratic Classrooms. John Wiley & Sons.
  17. Brunton, F., & Nissenbaum, H. (2015). Obfuscation: A user’s guide for privacy and protest. MIT Press.
  18. Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. Routledge.
  19. Castellví, J., Escribano, C., Santos, R., & Marolla, J. (2022). Futures education: Curriculum and educational practices in Australia, Spain, and Chile. Comunicar, 30(73), 45–55.
  20. https://doi.org/10.3916/c73-2022-04
  21. Chavez, F. R. (2021). The anti-racist writing workshop. How to decolonize the creative classroom. Haymarket Books.
  22. Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design justice: Community-led practices to build the world we need. MIT Press.
  23. https://design-justice.pubpub.org/
  24. Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.
  25. Crawford, K., & Joler, V. (2018). Anatomy of an AI system.
  26. https://anatomyof.ai/
  27. Cronin, C., Zamora, M., & Bali, M. (n.d.). Equity Unbound.
  28. http://unboundeq.creativitycourse.org/
  29. Crowley, D. (2019). Binti’s r/evolutionary cosmopolitan ecologies. The Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry, 6(2), 237–56.
  30. https://doi.org/10.1017/pli.2018.54
  31. Czerniewicz, L. (2022). Multi-layered digital inequalities in HEIs: the paradox of the post-digital society. GUNI Report: New Visions for Higher Education towards 2030, 1–8.
  32. https://www.guni-call4action.org/article/multi-layered-digital-in equalities-heis-paradox-post-digital-society
  33. Dabiri, E. (2021). What white people can do next: From allyship to coalition. Penguin.
  34. Daly, A., Devitt, A. K., & Mann, M. (Eds), (2019). Good data. Institute of Network Cultures.
  35. Davis, E. S. (2020). Decolonizing knowledge in Nnedi Okorafor’s Binti trilogy. In A. S. Moore, & S. Pinto (Eds), Writing beyond the state. Post-sovereign approaches to human rights in literary studies (pp. 43–63). Springer.
  36. https://10.1007/978-3-030-34456-6_3
  37. Dixon-Román, E., Nichols, T. P., & Nyame-Mensah, A. (2020). The racializing forces of/in AI educational technologies. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 236–50.
  38. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1667825
  39. Dion, M. L., Sumner, J. L., & Mitchell, S. M. (2018). Gendered citation patterns across political science and social science methodology fields. Political Analysis, 26(3), 312–27.
  40. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.12
  41. Escobar, A. (2007). Worlds and knowledges otherwise. Cultural Studies, 21(2), 179–210.
  42. http://www.unc.edu/~aescobar/html/texts.html
  43. Facer, K. (2019a). Learning to live with a lively planet: Renewing the mission of the European University [Video]. Youtube.
  44. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zHml2ySV2w
  45. Facer, K. (2019b). Storytelling in troubled times: what is the role for educators in the deep crises of the 21st century? Literacy, 53(1), 2–13.
  46. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12176
  47. Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. In H. L. Dreyfus, & P. Rabinow (Eds), Michel Foucault: Beyond hermeneutics and structuralism (pp. 208–26). Harvester.
  48. Gabrys, J. (2018). Becoming planetary. E-Flux.
  49. https://www.e-flux.com/architecture/accumulation/217051/becoming-planetary
  50. Gourlay, L. (2021). Posthumanism and the digital university. Bloomsbury Academic.
  51. Gutiérrez, M. (2018). Data activism and social change. Palgrave.
  52. Hall, S. (1997). The work of representation. In S. Hall (Ed.), Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (pp. 13–64). Sage.
  53. Hanchey, J. N. (2020). Desire and the politics of africanfuturism. Women’s Studies in Communication, 43(2), 119–24.
  54. https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2020.1745589
  55. Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
  56. Harney, S., & Moten, F. (2013). The undercommons: Fugitive planning and Black study. Minor Compositions.
  57. Hicks, D. (2011). Dignity: Its essential role in resolving conflict. Yale University Press.
  58. Holbert, N., Dando, M., & Correa, I. (2020). Afrofuturism as critical constructionist design: building futures from the past and present. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(4), 328–44.
  59. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1754237
  60. hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. Routledge.
  61. Iske, S., Fromme, J., Verständig, D., & Wilde, K. (Eds), (2020). Big data, Datafizierung und digitale Artefakte. Springer VS.
  62. Jarke, J., & Breiter, A. (2019). Special issue: Datafication of education. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 1–6.
  63. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1573833
  64. Johnson, A. (Ed.), (2019). Drones and dreams: A speculative sprint story collection. Digital Asia Hub.
  65. https://www.digitalasiahub.org/publications/drones-and-dreams-a-s peculative-sprint-story-collection/
  66. Jungk, R., & Müllert, N. R. (1987). Future workshops: How to create desirable futures. Institute for Social Inventions.
  67. Knox, J., Williamson, B., & Bayne, S. (2019). Machine behaviourism: Future visions of “learnification” and “datafication” across humans and digital technologies. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 31–45.
  68. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1623251
  69. Kwet, M. (2017). Operation Phakisa Education: Why a secret? Mass surveillance, inequality, and race in South Africa’s emerging national e-education system. First Monday, 22(12).
  70. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v22i12.8054
  71. Lackey, C. (1994). Social science fiction: Writing sociological short stories to learn about social issues. Teaching Sociology, 22(2), 166–73.
  72. https://doi.org/10.2307/1318562
  73. Le Guin, U. K. (2019 [1976]). The Left Hand of Darkness. Penguin.
  74. Lerman, L., & Borstel, J. (2003). Liz Lerman’s Critical Response Process: A method for getting useful feedback on anything you make, from dance to dessert. ‎ Liz Lerman Dance Exchange.
  75. Lipmanowicz, H., & McCandless, K. (2013). The surprising power of liberating structures. Liberating Structures Press.
  76. https://www.liberatingstructures.com
  77. Macgilchrist, F., Allert, H., & Bruch, A. (2020). Students and society in the 2020s: Three future “histories” of education and technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 76–89.
  78. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2019.1656235
  79. Macgilchrist, F., Hartong, S., & Jornitz, S. (2023). Algorithmische Datafizierung und Schule: kritische Ansätze in einem wachsenden Forschungsfeld. In K. Scheiter, & I. Gogolin (Eds), Bildung für eine digitale Zukunft (Edition ZfE) (pp. 317–38). Springer VS.
  80. Mbembe, A. (2022, January 11). How to develop a planetary consciousness [Interview]. Noema.
  81. https://www.noemamag.com/how-to-develop-a-planetary-consciousness
  82. Mignolo, W. D. (2009). Epistemic disobedience, independent thought and decolonial freedom. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(7–8), 159–81.
  83. Milan, S., & Treré, E. (2019). Big data from the South(s): Beyond data universalism. Television & New Media, 20(4), 319–35.
  84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419837739
  85. Muñoz, J. E. (2019). Cruising utopia: The then and there of queer futurity. New York University Press.
  86. Okorafor, N. (2015). Binti. Tor.
  87. Okorafor, N. (2017a). Binti: Home. Tor.
  88. Okorafor, N. (2017b). Binti: The night masquerade. Tor.
  89. Okorafor, N. (2017c). Sci-fi stories that imagine a future Africa.
  90. https://www.ted.com/talks/nnedi_okorafor_sci_fi_stories_that_imagine_a_future_africa
  91. Okorafor, N. (2019). Africanfuturism defined.
  92. https://nnedi.blogspot.com/2019/10/africanfuturism-defined.html
  93. Parra, H., Cruz, L., Amiel, T., & Machado, J. (2018). Infraestruturas, economia e política informacional: o caso do google suite for education. Mediações – Revista de Ciências Sociais, 23(1), 63–99.
  94. https://doi.org/10.5433/2176-6665.2018v23n1p63
  95. Pink, S., & Postill, J. (2019). Imagining mundane futures. Anthropology in Action, 26(2), 31–41.
  96. https://doi.org/10.3167/aia.2019.260204
  97. Prinsloo, P. (2020). Data frontiers and frontiers of power in (higher) education: A view of/from the Global South. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(4), 366–83.
  98. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1723537
  99. Quijano, A. (2010). Coloniality and modernity/rationality. In W. D. Mignolo, & A. Escobar (Eds), Globalization and the decolonial option (pp. 22–32). Routledge.
  100. Raffaghelli, J. E. (2022). Alfabetización en datos y justicia social ¿Un oxímoron? Respuestas desde la contra-hegemonía. Revista Izquierdas, 51, 1–18.
  101. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8361359
  102. Reh, S., & Ricken, N. (2012). Das Konzept der Adressierung. Zur Methodologie einer qualitativ-empirischen Erforschung von Subjektivation. In I. Miethe, & H. R. Müller (Eds), Qualitative Bildungsforschung und Bildungstheorie (pp. 36–55). Barbara Budrich.
  103. Ricken, N., Casale, R., & Thompson, C. (Eds), (2019). Subjektivierung. Erziehungswissenschaftliche Theorieperspektiven. Beltz Juventa.
  104. Rodriguez, C. (2001). Fissures in the mediascape: An international study of citizen’s media. Hampton Press.
  105. Särkelä, E., & Suoranta, J. (2020). The method of empathy-based stories as a tool for research and teaching. The Qualitative Report.
  106. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4124
  107. Selwyn, N., Hillman, T., Eynon, R., Ferreira, G., Knox, J., Macgilchrist, F., & Sancho-Gil, J. M. (2020). What’s next for ed-tech? Critical hopes and concerns for the 2020s. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(1), 1–6.
  108. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1694945
  109. Sørensen, E. (2009). The Materiality of learning: Technology and knowledge in educational practice. Cambridge University Press.
  110. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576362.
  111. Suoranta, J., Teräs, M., Teräs, H., Jandrić, P., Ledger, S., Macgilchrist, F., & Prinsloo, P. (2021). Speculative social science fiction of digitalization in higher education: From what is to what could be. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(2), 224–36.
  112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00260-6
  113. UNESCO (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education.
  114. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707.locale=en
  115. Vetter, A. (2023). Konviviale Technik. Empirische Technikethik für eine Postwachstumsgesellschaft. Transcript.
  116. Wagener-Böck, N., Macgilchrist, F., Rabenstein, K., & Bock, A. (2023). From automation to symmation: Ethnographic perspectives on what happens in front of the screen. Postdigital Science and Education, 5(1), 136–51.
  117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00350-z
  118. Wallin, A., Koro-Ljungberg, M., & Eskola, J. (2019). The method of empathy-based stories. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 42(5), 525–35.
  119. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2018.1533937
  120. Williamson, B. (2018). Big data and education. Sage.
  121. Youdell, D. (2006). Subjectivation and performative politics: Butler thinking Althusser and Foucault: intelligibility, agency and the raced-nationed-religioned subjects of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27(4), 511–28.
  122. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile Books.