Skip to main content
Open Book Publishers

5. Artistic Practice as Embodied Learning: Reconnecting Pedagogy, Improvisation, and Composition

Chapter of: Teaching Music Performance in Higher Education: Exploring the Potential of Artistic Research(pp. 135–164)

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.1
  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Metadata
Title5. Artistic Practice as Embodied Learning
SubtitleReconnecting Pedagogy, Improvisation, and Composition
ContributorRobert Sholl(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0398.07
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0398/chapters/10.11647/obp.0398.07
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
CopyrightRobert Sholl
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2024-05-27
Long abstractAlmost fourty-five years ago, Joseph Kerman proposed the notion of getting out of analysis, in fact a strategy through criticism to broaden its formalist parameters (Kerman, 1980). Kerman’s argument was flawed in many respects as Agawu pointed out; analysis was necessary in his view to teach “undergraduate music theory” and “basic musical literacy,” (Agawu, 2004: 269) something Kerman would not have denied. Yet these debates, and their continuation (Horton 2020; Cavett et al. 2023) have missed something more fundamental, especially as ideological ivory towers and territories needed protection. Over the last fourty years the rise of theory courses, has led to a schism between theory as a discipline and theory as a necessary precursor to practice (for learning repertoire, improvisation and composition); this is till prevalent in Universities and conservatoires today. This issue has not been helped by the interdisciplinarity of musicology, by the concomitant continual expansion of the curriculum, and the move away in many university departments from study of ‘the dots’ to other equally-valid forms of engagement with music. Part of this separation results from an educational ideal that differentiation is necessary before integration, something that the somatic thinker Mosche Feldenkrais advocated, but the ‘integration’ element, has more often been left to chance. This study seeks to make a pedagogical synthesis between theory improvisation and composition, allowing the teacher and student to move freely between these areas, and the student to develop their own sense of autonomy. Artistic research is premised on knowing something, on having some ‘petrol in the tank’, and especially on the ability to make aesthetic choices. This paper develops a critical and reflexive method to do begin this task. It begins by presenting a creative rethinking of species counterpoint, a foundation for thinking in Schenkerian analysis (Forte and Gilbert, 1983, also played out through Kennan 1987, Schubert 2003, Davidian 2015, and Denisch 2017) through Bach’s Goldberg Variations (1741). This develops a resource for pedagogy and practice through teaching musical techniques of composition. I present a layered-cake of musical lines against the figured bass of the theme (moving from semibreves to quavers) as an exercise that inculcates various aspects of var. 1 of the ‘Goldbergs’, and then I explore the codes and ramifications of this that allow both historical sensitivity and creative development. This contextualized exercise provides a stepping-stone to a discussion of Variation 1 (prefigured in my species example), and the development of complete variations beginning with a given “invention” (Dreyfus 1997), and then moving to the composition of new ideas. I suggest how these exercises can be used for teaching improvisation and show how this invaluable connection can be developed through other models (‘la folia’ for example). This model of thinking is historically connected to partimenti (Gjerdingen 2010, 2020), and, following Feldenkrais’s thinking (Sholl 2019, 2021), I provide different solutions to the same exercises. This strategy attempts to promote an “adaptive flexibility” (Thelen and Smith 2004) in which students can enactively and organically learn musical and technical fluency, while also developing their creativity and autonomy.
Page rangepp. 135–164
Print length30 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Contributors

Robert Sholl

(author)
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9734-2645

Robert Sholl teaches at The Royal Academy of Music and the University of West London, and is an Assistant organist at Arundel Cathedral. His has written extensively on twentieth-century music, including Messiaen Studies, and James MacMillan Studies, ed. with George Parsons (both Cambridge University Press, 2007 and 2021), Contemporary Music and Spirituality ed. with Sander van Maas (Routledge, 2017), The Feldenkrais Method in Creative Practice(Bloomsbury, 2021), and on musical improvisation to film (published in Princeton’s journal Perspectives of New Music). He is the editor of Olivier Messiaen in Context (Cambridge University Press, forthcoming), and the author of a biography of Messiaen for Reaktion’s ‘Critical Lives’ series. Robert studied in Melbourne, then in Paris (with Olivier Latry, and at the Sorbonne, Paris IV), and in London (at King’s College). In 2016-17 he played all of Olivier Messiaen’s organ works, and in 2021-3 all of Louis Vierne's organ symphonies, the complete Duruflé organ works, and major works of Charles Tournemire at Arundel Cathedral. He has given recitals at the St John’s Smith Square, St Paul’s Cathedral, Westminster Abbey, and twice at the Madeleine and at Notre-Dame de Paris.

References
  1. Agawu, Kofi, ‘How We Got out of Analysis, and How to Get Back in Again’, Music Analysis, 23.2/3 (July–October 2004), pp. 267–86
  2. Benjamin, Thomas, The Craft of Tonal Counterpoint with examples from the works of J. S. Bach (New York and London: Routledge, 2003), https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203494110
  3. Bernstein, Nikolai, Dexterity and its Development, ed. by Mark Latash and Michael Turvey (New York: Psychology Press, 1986)
  4. Caines, Rebecca and Ajay Heble (eds), The Improvisation Studies Reader: Spontaneous Acts (New York: Routledge, 2015), https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203083741
  5. Cavett, Esther, ed and compiler, ‘Valuing the Surplus: Perspectives on Julian Horton’s Article “On the Musicological Necessity of Music Analysis”’, with contributions by Kofi Agawu, Gurminder K. Bhogal, Esther Cavett, Jonathan Dunsby, Julian Horton, Alexandra Monchick, Ian Pace, Henry Stobart, and Simon Zagorski-Thomas, in Music Analysis, 32.3, 412–71, https://doi.org/10.1111/musa.12221
  6. Chaffin, Roger, Gabriela Imreh, and Mary Crawford, Practicing Perfection: Memory and Piano Performance (New York: Psychology Press, 2002), https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410612373
  7. Christensen, Thomas, Robert Gjerdingen, Dirk Moelants, and Giorgio Sanguinetti, Partimento and Continuo Playing in Theory and in Practice (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2010)
  8. Davidian, Teresa, Tonal Counterpoint for the 21st Century Musician: An Introduction (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2015)
  9. Denisch, Beth, Contemporary Counterpoint: Theory and Application (Boston, MA: Berklee Press, 2017)
  10. Doğantan-Dack, Mine, ‘Expanding the Scope of Music Theory: Artistic Research in Music Performance’, Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Musiktheorie, 19/2 (2022), https://www.gmth.de/zeitschrift/artikel/1169.aspx?fbclid=IwAR26sZcGvqUEtw3s9NG5rzGdm56D3N41Z_s5HFfKZQZOGh0CbuVA_GyO3z8
  11. Dreyfus, Laurence, Bach and the Patterns of Invention (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997)
  12. Evans, Dylan, An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis (London: Routledge, 1996)
  13. Feldenkrais, Mosche, Body & Mature Behavior: A Study of Anxiety, Sex, Gravitation & Learning (New York: International Universities Press Inc., 1966).
  14. Feldenkrais, Mosche, Dr Mosche Feldenkrais at Alexander Yanai, ed. by Ellen Soloway, trans. by Anat Baniel (Paris: International Feldenkrais Federation, 1994), Lesson 22: ‘Sitting on the Floor with the help of your hands’, pp. 131–36
  15. ——, Embodied Wisdom: The Collected Papers of Mosche Feldenkrais, ed. by Elizabeth Beringer (Berkeley, CA: Somatic Resources and North Atlantic Books, 2010)
  16. ——, ‘Lecture: Learning, Free Choice, Individuality’, New York, Quest Workshop (San Diego, CA: Feldenkrais Resources, 1981)
  17. ——, Thinking and Doing (Longmont, CO: Genesis II, 2013)
  18. Førisdal, Anders, Christina Kobb, and Erlend Hovland (eds), Music & Practice, 10 (2023), https://www.musicandpractice.org/volume-10/
  19. Fraser, Alan, Play the Piano with your Whole self: Refine the Physical to Free Your Inner Musician: Biotensegrity, the Inner Conductor, & Expressively Directed Micro-Timing at the Piano (Novi Sad: The Piano Somatics Press: 2022)
  20. Forte, Allen, and Steven E. Gilbert, Introduction to Schenkerian Analysis: Form and Content in Tonal Music (New York: W. W. Norton, 1982)
  21. ——, Instructor’s Manual for Introduction to Schenkerian Analysis (New York: W. W. Norton, 1982)
  22. Gorton, David and Stefan Östersjö, ‘Austerity Measures I: performing the Discursive Voice’, in Voices, Bodies, Practices: Performing Musical Subjectivities, ed. by Catherine Laws, William Brooks, David Gorton, Thanh Thủy Nguyễn, Stefan Östersjö, and Jeremy J. Wells (Leuven: Leuven University Press, 2019), pp. 29–79
  23. Gjerdingen, Robert, Child Composers in the Old Conservatories: How Orphans Became Elite Musicians (New York: Oxford University Press, 2020)
  24. Henke, Silvia, Dieter Mersch, Thomas Strässle, Jörg Wiesel, and Nicolaj van der Meulen, Manifesto of Artistic Research: A Defense Against Its Advocates (Zurich: Diaphanes, 2020)
  25. Ho, Jocelyn, ‘Corporeal Musical Structure: A Gestural-Kinesthetic Approach to Tōru Takemitsu’s Rain Tree Sketch II’, Music Theory Online, 27.4 (December 2021), https://mtosmt.org/issues/mto.21.27.4/mto.21.27.4.ho.html
  26. Horton, Julian, ‘On the Musicological Necessity of Musical Analysis’, Musical Quarterly, 103.1–2 (2022), 62–104
  27. Kennan, Kent Wheeler, Counterpoint Based on Eighteenth Century Practice, 3rd edn. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1987)
  28. Kerman, Joseph, ‘How We Got into Analysis, and How to Get out’, Critical Inquiry, 7.2 (Winter 1980), pp. 311–31
  29. Lacan, Jacques, Seminar XI, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis, ed. by Jacques-Alain Miller, trans. by Alan Sheridan (London: Karnac, 2004)
  30. ——, Seminar VII, The Ethics of Psychoanalysis, 1959–60, ed. by Jacques-Alain Miller, trans. by Dennis Porter (London and New York: Routledge, 1992).
  31. LaRue, Jan, Guidelines for Style Analysis: Models for Style Analysis, a Companion Text, 2nd edn, ed. by Marian Green LaRue (Detroit: Harmonie Park, 2011)
  32. Lewis, George E., and Benjamin Piekut, The Oxford Handbook of Critical Improvisation Studies (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016), https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195370935.001.0001
  33. Leong, Daphne, Performing Knowledge: Twentieth-Century Music in Analysis and Performance (New York: Oxford University Press, 2019), https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190653545.001.0001
  34. McCaw, Dick, ‘Learning through Feeling: How the Ideas of Nikolai Bernstein and Moshe Feldenkrais Apply to Performer Training’, The Feldenkrais Method in Creative Practice: Dance, Music, and Theatre, ed. by Robert Sholl (London: Methuen, 2021), pp. 55–72, https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350158412.ch-003
  35. McManus, Chris, Right Hand, Left hand: The Origins of Asymmetry in Brains, Bodies, Atoms, and Cultures (London: Phoenix, 2002)
  36. Mortensen, John J., The Pianist’s Guide to Historical Improvisation (New York: Oxford University Press, 2020)
  37. Pace, Ian, ‘In Defence of Analytically-Informed Performance’. Keynote Paper presented at the International Encounters on Music Theory and Analysis Conference, 6 November 2019, São Paolo, Brazil, https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/30386/
  38. Rogg, Lionel, Improvisation Course for Organists (Fleurier: Schola Cantorum, 1988)
  39. Russell, Roger, ‘Radical Practice: Practising Performance and Practising Oneself is the Same Activity’, The Feldenkrais Method in Creative Practice: Dance, Music, and Theatre, ed. by Robert Sholl (London: Methuen, 2021), pp. 83–102
  40. Salzer, Felix, and Carl Schachter, Counterpoint in Composition: The Study of Voice-Leading (New York: Columbia University Press, 1989)
  41. Sarath, Edward, Music Theory through Improvisation: A New Approach to Musicianship training (New York: Taylor and Francis, 2010)
  42. Schmalfeldt, Janet, ‘Who’s Keeping the Score?’ In Investigating Musical Performance: Theoretical Models and Intersections, ed. by Gianmario Borio, Giovanni Giuriati, Alessandro Cecchi, and Marco Lutzu (New York: Routledge, 2020), pp. 91–101, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429026461-10
  43. Schubert, Peter, Modal Counterpoint, Renaissance Style (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003)
  44. Sholl, Robert, ‘Feldenkrais’s Touch, Ephram’s Laughter, Gould’s Sensorium: Listening and Musical Practice between Thinking and Doing’, Journal of the Royal Musical Association, 144.2 (2019), 397–428, https://doi.org/10.1080/02690403.2019.1651500
  45. Stoiber, Franz Josef, Fascination Organ Improvisation: A Study and Practice Book (Kassel: Bärenreiter, 2018)
  46. Street, Alan, ‘The Rhetorico-Musical Structure of the “Goldberg” Variations: Bach’s “Clavier-Übung” IV and the “Institutio Oratoria” of Quintilian’, Music Analysis, 6.1/2 (March–July 1987), 89–131
  47. Swinkin, Jeffrey, Performative Analysis: Reimagining Music Theory for Performance (Rochester, NY: Rochester University Press, 2016), https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc16ncq
  48. Thelen, Esther, ‘The Central Role of Action in Typical and Atypical Development’, in Movement and Action in Learning and Development: Clinical Implications of Pervasive Developmental Disorders, ed. by Ida J. Stockman (San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2004), pp. 49–73
  49. Thelen, Esther, and Linda B. Smith, ‘Dynamic Systems Theories’, in Handbook of Child Psychology, 5th edn, ed. by William Damon (New York: J. Wiley, 2006), pp. 258–312
  50. Thelen, Gregor Schöner, Christian Scheier, and Linda B. Smith, ‘The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24 (2001), 1–86, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x01003910
  51. Žižek, Slavoj, Surplus-Enjoyment: A Guide for the Non-Perplexed (London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022)