Skip to main content
Open Book Publishers

14. Rethinking mathematics education

Chapter of: Breaking Images: Iconoclastic Analyses of Mathematics and its Education(pp. 335–372)

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.1
  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Metadata
Title14. Rethinking mathematics education
ContributorAlan H. Schoenfeld(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0407.14
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0407/chapters/10.11647/obp.0407.14
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
CopyrightAlan Schoenfeld
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2024-12-11
Long abstractI am now concluding my fiftieth year as a professional mathematics educator. That benchmark provides an opportunity to reflect on the emergence of ideas and understandings over the past five decades, and the persistence of challenges that the field continues to face. To quote from the opening page of A Tale of Two Cities, “it was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the age of wisdom, it was the age of foolishness, it was the epoch of belief, it was the epoch of incredulity, it was the season of light, it was the season of darkness, it was the spring of hope, it was the winter of despair.” On the one hand, our intellectual advances have been extraordinary. We understand thinking, teaching, and learning in ways that transcend previous understandings. In this chapter, we take a chronological tour through such discoveries—the nature of problem solving, of teaching, of powerful learning environments. On the other hand, both social progress and institutional progress have been hard to come by. Schools and classrooms reflect the structural and racial ills of American society; mathematics instruction, while potentially meaningful and useful in people’s lives, has little to do with the kinds of sense-making it could support. If anything, school mathematics’ distance from meaningful issues in people’s lives serves to reify current structures rather than to problematize and challenge them. The chapter concludes with a proposal to address this state of affairs.
Page rangepp. 335–372
Print length38 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Contributors

Alan H. Schoenfeld

(author)
Elizabeth and Edward Conner Chair in Education at University of California, Berkeley
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1858-959X

Alan Schoenfeld is a Distinguished Professor at the University of California at Berkeley, where he holds the Elizabeth and Edward Conner Chair in Education and is affiliated professor of Mathematics. His career has been devoted to understanding and supporting powerful mathematics teaching and learning, at the individual, classroom, and systemic levels.

References
  1. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble & R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289–325). Lawrence Erlbaum. 
  2. 1998 California Proposition 227. (2022, August 1). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1998_California_Proposition_227
  3. Burkhardt, H., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2019). Formative assessment in mathematics. In R. Bennett, H. Andrade, & G. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment in the disciplines (pp. 35–67). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315166933-3
  4. Burkhardt, H., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (in preparation). Assessment and mathematical literacy: A brief introduction. International Encyclopedia of Education, 4th Edition.
  5. Center for American Progress. (2019, August 7). Systemic inequality: Displacement, exclusion, and segregation. American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/race/reports/2019/08/07/472617/systemic-inequality-displacement-exclusion-segregation/
  6. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. http://www.corestandards.org
  7. Egede, L., & Walker, R. (2020). Structural racism, social risk factors, and Covid-19: A dangerous convergence for Black Americans. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(12). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2023616
  8. Gamow, G. (1947). One Two Three… Infinity. Viking.
  9. Gaylord-Harden, N., Adams-Bass, V., Bogan, E., Francis, L., Scott, J., Seaton, E., & Williams, J. (2020, September 9). Addressing Inequities in Education: Considerations for Black children and youth in the era of COVID-19. SRCD. https://www.srcd.org/research/addressing-inequities-education-considerations-black-children-and-youth-era-covid-19
  10. Gutiérrez, R. (2013). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 37–68. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.44.1.0037
  11. Gutstein, E. (2006). Reading and writing the world with mathematics: Toward a pedagogy for social justice. Taylor & Francis.
  12. Gutstein, E., & Peterson, B. (Eds.). (2015). Rethinking mathematics: Teaching social justice by the numbers. Rethinking Schools.
  13. Halmos, P. (1980). The heart of mathematics. American Mathematical Monthly, 87(7), 519–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.1980.11995081
  14. Herman, J., Epstein, S., Leon, S., La Torre Matrundola, D., Reber, S., & Choi, K. (2014). Implementation and effects of LDC and MDC in Kentucky districts. University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
  15. Herman, R., Boruch, R., Powell, R., Flesichman, S, & Maynard, R. (2006). Overcoming the challenges: A response to Alan H. Schoenfeld’s ‘What doesn’t work’. Educational Researcher, 35(2), 22–23. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035002022
  16. Kozol, J. (1992). Savage inequalities. Harper Perennial.
  17. Lappan, G., & Phillips, E. (2009). A designer speaks. Educational Designer, 1(3). http://www.educationaldesigner.org/ed/volume1/issue3/article11
  18. Martin, D. B. (2009). Researching race in mathematics education. Teachers College Record, 111(2), 295–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100208
  19. Martin, D. B. (2019). Equity, inclusion, and antiblackness in mathematics education. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 22(4), 459–478, https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2019.1592833
  20. Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey, K. (1982). Thinking mathematically. Addison-Wesley.
  21. McKinney de Royston, M., & Vossoughi, S. (2021, January 18). Fixating on pandemic “learning loss” undermines the need to transform education. Truthout, https://truthout.org/articles/fixating-on-pandemic-learning-loss-undermines-the-need-to-transform-education/
  22. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
  23. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. NCTM.
  24. National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. National Academy Press.
  25. Pólya, G. (1957). How to solve it. Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1945)
  26. Pólya, G. (1954). Mathematics and plausible reasoning. Princeton University Press.
  27. Pólya, G. (1981). Mathematical discovery. Wiley. (Original work published 1962-1965)
  28. Research for Action. (2015). MDC’s influence on teaching and Learning. Research for Action. https://www.researchforaction.org/publications/mdcs-influence-on-teaching-and-learning
  29. Ridgway, J., Crust, R., Burkhardt, H., Wilcox, S., Fisher, L., & Foster, D. (2000). MARS report on the 2000 tests. Mathematics Assessment Collaborative.
  30. Rothstein, R. (2017). The color of law. Liveright.
  31. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Academic Press.
  32. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1988) When good teaching leads to bad results: The disasters of well taught mathematics classes. Educational Psychologist, 23(2), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2302_5
  33. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1989). Explorations of students’ mathematical beliefs and behavior. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(4), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.20.4.0338
  34. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). MacMillan.
  35. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2004). The math wars. Educational Policy, 18(1), 253–286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904803260042
  36. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2006a). What doesn’t work: The challenge and failure of the What Works Clearinghouse to conduct meaningful reviews of studies of mathematics curricula. Educational Researcher, 35(2), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035002013
  37. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2006b). Reply to comments from the What Works Clearinghouse on What Doesn’t Work. Educational Researcher, 35(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035002023
  38. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2008). Problem solving in The United States, 1970–2008: Research and theory, practice and politics. ZDM Mathematics Education, 39(5-6), 537–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0038-z
  39. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2017). Teaching for robust understanding of essential mathematics. In T. McDougal (Ed.), Essential mathematics for the next generation: What and how students should learn (pp. 104–129). Tokyo Gagukei University.
  40. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2020a). Mathematical practices, in theory and practice. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52(6), 1163–1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01162-w
  41. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2020b). Reframing teacher knowledge: A research and development agenda. ZDM, 52(2), 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01057-5
  42. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2021). Reflections on 50 years of research & development in science education: What have we learned? And where might we be going? In A. Hofstein, A. Arcavi, B.-S. Eylon, & A. Yarden (Eds.), (2021). Long-term research and development in science education: What have we learned? (pp. 387–412). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004503625_017
  43. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2022). Why are learning and teaching mathematics so difficult? In M. Danesi (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive mathematics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44982-7_10-1
  44. Schoenfeld, A. H., & Burkhardt, H. (March 20, 2012). Content specifications the Summative Assessment of the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. https://portal.smarterbalanced.org/library/en/mathematics-content-specifications.pdf
  45. Schoenfeld, A. H., & Pearson, P. D. (2009) The reading and math wars. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, & D. Plank (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 560–580). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203880968-51
  46. Schoenfeld, A. H., & The Teaching for Robust Understanding Project. (2018). An Introduction to the Teaching for Robust Understanding (TRU) framework. Graduate School of Education. Retrieved from https://truframework.org.
  47. Senk, S. L., & Thompson, D. R. (Eds.). (2002). Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn? Erlbaum.
  48. Urban Institute. (2020). Structural racism. https://www.urban.org/features/structural-racism-america
  49. US Department of Education. (2003). Identifying and implementing educational practices supported by rigorous evidence: A user friendly guide. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/evidence_based/evidence_based.asp
  50. Wilkerson, I. (2020). Caste. Random House.