Skip to main content
Open Book Publishers

12. Art and anti-mathematics

Chapter of: Breaking Images: Iconoclastic Analyses of Mathematics and its Education(pp. 269–290)

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Metadata
Title12. Art and anti-mathematics
ContributorHouman Harouni(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0407.12
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0407/chapters/10.11647/obp.0407.12
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
CopyrightHouman Harouni
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2024-12-11
Long abstractScattered across history and cultures, we encounter instances of people trying to limit or reject the expansion and application of mathematics. These actions, which we can refer to as “anti-mathematics”, are particularly common among artists of the modern era. This chapter tries to decipher, through a close reading of a large group of examples, the different motivations and desires that give rise to anti-mathematics across different contexts. The author argues that such actions are attempts at shielding particular ways of life from the encroachment of forces (economic, philosophical, and administrative) that use mathematics as their main instrument. In art, the pain and confusion caused by the uses of mathematics can be hurled back at those uses and expose their underlying violence. Anti-mathematics, however, does not only expose. It always creates new zones, new approaches, new products for thinking and life. The author finally connects these historical examples with the experience of children in contemporary schools and suggests that a study of anti-mathematics might be the key to developing an autonomous and rational relationship to the irrationality of mathematized reason.
Page rangepp. 269–290
Print length22 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Contributors

Houman Harouni

(author)
Lecturer at the Harvard Graduate School of Education at Harvard University
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9056-6038

Houman Harouni is a Lecturer at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. His work addresses the potential of institutions for maintaining or changing social relations.

References
  1. Aristotle. (1984). Physics. In W. D. Ross (Trans.), The complete works of Aristotle. Princeton University Press.
  2. Augustine. (1995). De doctrina Christiana [On Christian Doctrine]. Clarendon.
  3. Bakunin, M. A. (1910). God and the state. Freedom.
  4. Barber, B. (1990). Social studies of science. Transaction.
  5. Belk, R. W. (2005). Exchange taboos from an interpretive perspective. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1501_3
  6. Byron, G. G. B. (1899). The works of Lord Byron. J. Murray.
  7. Comte, A. (1876). System of positive polity. Longmans, Green, & Company.
  8. Davis, N. Z. (1960). Sixteenth-century French arithmetics on the business life. Journal of the History of Ideas, 21(1), 18–48.
  9. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1994). What is philosophy? Columbia University Press.
  10. DeLyria, J., & Robinson, S. M. (2011, March 23). ‘When it’s not your turn’: The quintessentially Victorian vision of Ogden’s ‘The Wire’. Hooded Utilitarian. https://www.hoodedutilitarian.com/2011/03/when-its-not-your-turn-the-quintessentially-victorian-vision-of-ogdens-the-wire
  11. Dickens, C. (1854). Hard times: For these times. Bradbury & Evans.
  12. Dixon-Román, E. J. (2014). Deviance as pedagogy: From nondominant cultural capital to deviantly marked cultural repertoires. Teachers College Record, 116(8), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411600802
  13. Dostoevsky, F. (2011). Notes from underground. Knopf Doubleday.
  14. Fauvel-Gouraud, F. (1845). Phreno-mnemotechny: Or, the art of memory. Wiley and Putnam.
  15. Flaubert, G. (1893). Correspondance. G. Charpentier.
  16. Friberg, J. (2005). Unexpected links between Egyptian and Babylonian mathematics. World Scientific.
  17. Githuku, S. (2001). Taboos on counting. In M. Getui, K. Holter, & V. Zinkuratire (Eds.), Interpreting the Old Testament in Africa: Papers from the International Symposium on Africa and the Old Testament in Nairobi, October 1999 (pp. 113–118). Peter Lang.
  18. Hansson, S. O. (2018). The rise and fall of the anti-mathematical movement. In S. O. Hansson (Ed.), Technology and mathematics: Philosophical and historical investigations (pp. 305–323). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93779-3
  19. Harkness, D. E. (2007). The Jewel House: Elizabethan London and the scientific revolution. Yale University Press.
  20. Harouni, H. (2015a). Reframing the discussion on word problems: A political economy. For the Leaning of Mathematics, 35(2), 27–32.
  21. Harouni, H. (2015b). Toward a political economy of mathematics education. Harvard Educational Review, 85(1), 50–74.
  22. Harouni, H. (forthcoming). Anti-mathematics: A programmatic study.
  23. Heaviside, O. (1893). Electromagnetic theory. ‘The Electrician’ Printing and Publishing Company.
  24. Heidegger, M. (1969). Discourse on thinking. Harper & Row.
  25. Hoptman, L. J., & Pospiszyl, T. (2002). Primary documents: A sourcebook for Eastern and Central European art since the 1950s. Museum of Modern Art. Distributed by the MIT Press.
  26. Hundertwasser, F. (1958). Mouldiness manifesto against rationalism in architecture. Hundertwasser Archive. https://www.hundertwasser.at/english/texts/philo_verschimmelungsmanifest.php
  27. Karberg, R., Jalving, A., & Jalving, C. (1995). Hundertwasser: The phenomenon. In Hundertwasser, Arken (pp. 15–43). Museum of Modern Art.
  28. Koyré, A. (1966). Études d’histoire de la pensée scientifique [Studies in the history of scientific thought]. Presses Univeritaires de France.
  29. Marx, K. (1970). A contribution to the critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Cambridge University Press.
  30. Matson, W. (2001). Zeno moves! In A. Preus (Ed.), Essays in Ancient Greek philosophy VI: Before Plato (pp. 87–108). State University of New York Press.
  31. Mesquita, M., Restivo, S., & D’Ambrosio, U. (2011). Asphalt children and city streets: A life, a city and a case study of history, culture, and ethnomathematics in São Paulo. Sense.
  32. Newton, I. (1952). Opticks: Or a treatise of the reflections, refractions, inflections & colours of light. Dover.
  33. Novalis (2021). Mathematical fragments. Symphilosophie International Journal of Philosophical Romanticism, 3, 273–290.
  34. Park, S.-M. S. (2013). Census and censure: Sacred threshing floors and counting taboos in 2 Samuel 24. Horizons in Biblical Theology, 35(1), 21–41.
  35. Parra, N. (2004). Antipoems: How to look better & feel great. New Directions.
  36. Peitgens, H. O., & Richter, P. H. (1986). The beauty of fractals: Images of complex dynamical systems. Springer.
  37. Ranciére, J. (1991) The ignorant schoolmaster: Five lessons in intellectual emancipation.
  38. Stanford University Press.
  39. Read, C. (1898). Logic, deductive and inductive. Simpkin, Marshall, Hamilton, Kent, & Co.
  40. Salmon, N. (2001). The limits of human mathematics. Philosophical Perspectives, 13, 93-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/0029-4624.35.s15.5
  41. Schliesser, E. (2011). Newton’s challenge to philosophy: A programmatic essay. The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 1(1), 101–128.
  42. Schliesser, E. (2017). Adam Smith: Systematic philosopher and public thinker. Oxford University Press.
  43. Simon, D., & Burns, E. (Directors). (2002). Lessons (Season 1, Episode 8) [Television series episode]. In The Wire. Blown Deadline Productions; HBO Entertainment.
  44. Simon, D., & Burns, E. (Directors). (2008). Not for attribution (Season 5, Episode 3) [Television series episode]. In The Wire. Blown Deadline Productions; HBO Entertainment.
  45. Smarandache, F. (2012). Aftermath & antimath. Zip.
  46. Smith, D. E. (1935). Euclid, Omar Khayyam, and Saccheri. Scripta Mathematica, 3(1), 5–10.
  47. Sonnenschein, S., et al. (1889, June 5). A first Euclid. Bookseller: A Newspaper of British and Foreign Literature, 577.
  48. Turgenev, I. S. (2015). The novels of Ivan Turgenev: Dream tales and prose poems. BiblioBazaar.
  49. Urton, G. (1997). The social life of numbers: A Quechua ontology of numbers and philosophy of arithmetic. University of Texas Press.
  50. Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Swets & Zeitlinger.
  51. White, E. C. (1919). Mathematics and anti-mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 19(1), 20–37.
  52. Wigner, E. (1960). The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160130102
  53. Wolfe, C. T. (2017). Vital anti-mathematicism and the ontology of the emerging life sciences: From Mandeville to Diderot. Synthese, 196(9), 3633–3654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1350-y
  54. Young, T. (1813). An introduction to medical literature, including a system of practical nosology, intended as a guide to students, and an assistant to practitioners. Underwood and Blacks.
  55. Zakai, A. (2010). Jonathan Edwards’s philosophy of nature: The re-enchantment of the world in the age of scientific reasoning. T & T Clark.