Skip to main content
Open Book Publishers

12. Cambio climático, justicia distributiva y límites “preinstitucionales” a la apropiación de recursos

Chapter of: Tener Demasiado: Ensayos Filosóficos sobre el Limitarismo(pp. 331–372)

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.1
  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Metadata
Title12. Cambio climático, justicia distributiva y límites “preinstitucionales” a la apropiación de recursos
ContributorColin Hickey(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0354.12
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0354/chapters/10.11647/obp.0354.12
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
CopyrightColin Hickey
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2024-02-19
Long abstractEn este artículo, argumento que los individuos están obligados, previo a la existencia de instituciones justas que lo exijan de ellos, a restringir su uso, o compartir los beneficios equitativamente de cualquier uso más allá de sus derechos, de la capacidad de absorción de la Tierra (EAC) de gases de efecto invernadero, como cuestión de justicia distributiva global, dentro de un rango justificable específico. Como parte de la búsqueda de una concepción adecuada de la moralidad climática, abordo esta tarea revisitando e inspirándome en dos argumentos prominentes de la filosofía política clásica para pensar acerca de las normas (derechos, permisos, límites, etc.) con respecto a la apropiación “preinstitucional” de los recursos sin dueño: Locke y Kant, respectivamente. Los recursos básicos que desarrollan—en conexión a normas fundamentales de igualdad y derechos a la autoconservación y libertad—para generar su esquema particular de porciones distributivas previo a la existencia de instituciones justas puede conectarse útil y plausiblemente con el recurso escaso, valioso, rival, no excluible, global y sin dueño que es la EAC, con el fin de fortalecer una imagen de los derechos climáticos individuales en el mundo contemporáneo. Es una imagen que viene acompañada de algunas implicaciones bastante radicales, especialmente para los muy favorecidos.
Page rangepp. 331–372
Print length42 pages
LanguageSpanish (Translated_into)
Contributors

Colin Hickey

(author)
Assistant Professor in the Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics at University of Amsterdam
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2275-8130

Colin Hickey is an Assistant Professor at the University of Amsterdam, in the Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics. Previously, he was a postdoctoral research associate at Princeton University in the University Center for Human Values and the High Meadows Environmental Institute, and before that he was a postdoctoral researcher at Utrecht University with the Fair Limits Project. He received his PhD in philosophy from Georgetown University. His work focuses on moral and political philosophy, especially issues of climate justice and responsibility.

References
  1. Anderson, E. 1999. What is the point of equality? Ethics, 109, 287–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/233897
  2. Baatz, C. 2014. Climate change and individual duties to reduce GHG emissions. Ethics, Policy and Environment, 17, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2014.885406
  3. Baatz, C. 2016. Reply to my critics: justifying the fair share argument. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 19, 160–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2016.1205710
  4. Beitz, C. 2009. The Idea of Human Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
  5. Blomfield, M. 2013. Global common resources and the just distribution of emission shares. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 21, 283–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2012.00416.x
  6. Caney, S. 2012. Just emissions. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 40, 255–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12005
  7. Cripps, E. 2013. Climate Change and the Moral Agent: Individual Duties in an Interdependent World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Dolšak, N. and Ostrom, E. 2003. The challenges of the commons. In The Commons in the New Millennium: Challenges and Adaptations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 3–34.
  9. Gardiner, S. 2004. Ethics and global climate change. Ethics, 114, 555–600. https://doi.org/10.1086/382247
  10. Griffin, J. 2008. On Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  11. Herman, B. 1993. The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2026397
  12. Hickey, C., Rieder, T., and Earl, J. 2016. Population engineering and the fight against climate change. Social Theory and Practice, 42, 845–70. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract201642430
  13. Hill, T. 1991. Autonomy and Self-Respect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. IPCC. 2014. Summary for policymakers. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, C.B. Field, et al. (Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg2/ar5_wgII_spm_en.pdf
  15. IPCC. 2018. Summary for policy makers. Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report, V. Masson-Delmotte, et al., (Eds.). Geneva: World Meteorological Organization, https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/05/SR15_SPM_version_report_LR.pdf
  16. Jacobson, M., et al. 2017. 100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight all-sector energy roadmaps for 139 countries of the world. Joule, 1, 1–14, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.07.005
  17. Johnson, B. 2003. Ethical obligations in a tragedy of the commons. Environmental Values, 12, 271–87. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327103129341324
  18. Kant, I. 1996. The Metaphysics of Morals (MM), ed., M. Gregor, trans. M. Gregor. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Kant, I. 2008. La metafísica de las costumbres. Traducido por Adela Cortina Orts y Jesús Conill Sancho. Madrid: Tecnos.
  20. Kant, I. 2010. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (GW), ed., M. Gregor, trans., M. Gregor. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Kingston, E. and Sinnott-Armstrong, W. 2018. What’s wrong with joyguzzling? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 21, 169–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-017-9859-1
  22. Locke, J. 1963. Two Treatises of Government, rev. ed., ed., P. Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Locke, J. (2010). Segundo Tratado sobre el Gobierno Civil. Traducido por Carlos Mellizo. Madrid: Tecnos.
  24. Maltais, A. 2013. Radically non-ideal climate politics and the obligation to at least vote green. Environmental Values, 22, 589–608. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327113X13745164553798
  25. Mauritsen, T. and Pincus, R. 2017. Committed warming inferred from observations. Nature Climate Change, 7, 652–55. doi:10.1038/nclimate3357
  26. Miller, D. 2009. Global justice and climate change: How should responsibilities be distributed? In The Tanner Lectures on Human Values Vol. 28, Peterson, G. (Ed.). Salt Lake City, UT: The University of Utah Press.
  27. Neumayer, E. 2004. National carbon dioxide emissions: Geography matters. Area, 36, 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0004-0894.2004.00317.x
  28. Nickel, J. 2007. Making Sense of Human Rights, 2nd Ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  29. Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
  30. Nozick, Robert. 1991. Anarquía, Estado y utopía. Traducido por Rolando Tamayo. Buenos Aires-México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  31. Nussbaum, M. 2009. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  32. O’Neill, O. 2005. The dark side of human rights. International Affairs, 81, 427–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00459.x
  33. Raftery, A., et al. 2017. Less than 2°C warming by 2100 unlikely. Nature Climate Change, 7, 637–41. doi:10.1038/nclimate3352.
  34. Shue, H. 1996. Basic Rights, 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  35. Shue, H. 2014. Subsistence emissions and luxury emissions. In Climate Justice: Vulnerability and Protection. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.1993.tb00093.x
  36. Simmons, A. J. 1992. The Lockean Theory of Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  37. Simmons, A. J. 2001. Justification and Legitimacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  38. Singer, P. 2006. Ethics and climate change: A commentary on MacCracken, Toman and Gardiner. Environmental Values, 15, 415–22. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327106778226239
  39. Sinnott-Armstrong, W. 2005. It’s not my fault: Global warming and individual moral obligations. In his (co-ed.) Perspectives on Climate Change: Science, Economics, Politics, Ethics: Advances in the Economics of Environmental Research, Vol. 5. Amsterdam: Elsevier JAI, pp. 285–309.
  40. Sreenivasan, G. 1995. The Limits of Lockean Rights in Property. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  41. Stilz, A. 2009. Liberal Loyalty: Freedom, Obligation, and the State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  42. Traxler, M. 2002. Fair chore division for climate change. Social Theory and Practice, 28, 101–34. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract20022814
  43. U.S. EIA. 2017. International Energy Statistics. Available at: http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/IEDIndex3.cfm?tid=5&pid=5&aid=8 [Accessed 13 May 2020].
  44. UN. 2020. Goal 7: Affordable and clean energy. Sustainable Development Goals: 17 Goals to Transform Our World. Available at: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/energy/ [Accessed 13 May 2020].
  45. UN DESA (Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division). 2019. World Population Prospects 2019. Available at: https://population.un.org/wpp/Download/Standard/Population/ [Accessed 13 May 2020].
  46. UN FAO. 2019. The state of food security and nutrition in the world. Available at: http://www.fao.org/state-of-food-security-nutrition/en/ [Accessed 13 May 2020].
  47. UNDP. 2018. Human Development Reports. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/en/data [Accessed 13 May 2020].
  48. Vanderheiden, S. 2006. Climate change and the challenge of moral responsibility. Ethics and the Life Sciences, 85–92. https://doi.org/10.5840/jpr_2007_5
  49. Waldron, J. 2002. God, Locke, and Equality: Christian Foundations of John Locke’s Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  50. WHO. 2015. New report shows that 400 million do not have access to essential health services. 12 June. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2015/uhc-report/en/ [Accessed 13 May 2020].
  51. World Bank. 2016. Poverty overview. Available at: http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/overview [Accessed 13 May 2020]