Skip to main content
Open Book Publishers

1. Introducción a la filosofía del limitarismo

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Metadata
Title1. Introducción a la filosofía del limitarismo
ContributorIngrid Robeyns(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0354.01
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0354/chapters/10.11647/obp.0354.01
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
CopyrightIngrid Robeyns
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2024-02-19
Long abstractEste capítulo comienza con una descripción de la intuición básica del limitarismo: que puede haber situaciones en las que una persona ha acumulado demasiados recursos materiales. A continuación, hace algunos breves comentarios sobre el reciente surgimiento de esta literatura, así como de su desarrollo. Después, pasa a describir los tres objetivos del volumen: proveer un panorama de la literatura, proponer argumentos novedosos y poner en conversación más directa los debates sobre el limitarismo económico y el limitarismo ecológico. El capítulo concluye discutiendo algunas áreas para investigaciones futuras.
Page rangepp. 1–16
Print length16 pages
LanguageSpanish (Translated_into)
Contributors

Ingrid Robeyns

(author)
Chair in Ethics of Institutions at Utrecht University

Ingrid Robeyns holds the chair in Ethics of Institutions at Utrecht University. She received her PhD dissertation from Cambridge University in 2003 and has since been publishing widely on questions of distributive justice, inequalities, applied ethics, and methodological considerations. She served as the first Director of the Dutch Research School of Philosophy, as the former director of Utrecht University’s Ethics Institute, and as the eighth president of the Human Development and Capability Association. She has co-edited two edited volumes and three special journal issues, and has previously published the book Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice (2017, https://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0130) with Open Book Publishers. She currently has a contract with Allen Lane (UK) and Astra House (USA) for a trade book on limitarianism (with translation rights sold to seven other publishers), which is scheduled to appear in the winter of 2023–2024.

References
  1. Alì, Nunzio and Caranti, Luigi. 2021. How Much Economic Inequality Is Fair in Liberal Democracies? The Approach of Proportional Justice, Philosophy and Social Criticism, 47(7), 769–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453720987865
  2. Caranti, Luigi and Alì, Nunzio. 2021. The Limits of Limitarianism. Why Political Equality Is Not Protected by Robeyns’ Democratic Argument, Politica & Società, 89–116. http://doi.org/10.4476/100808
  3. Davis, Abigail, Hecht, Katharina, Burchardt, Tania, Gough, Ian, Hirsch, Donald, Rowlingson, Karen and Summers, Kate. 2020. Living on Different Incomes in London: Can Public Consensus Identify a ‘Riches Line’? London: Trust for London.
  4. Dumitru, Adelin-Costin. 2020. Republican Limitarianism and Sufficientarianism: A Proposal for Attaining Freedom as Non-Domination, Ethical perspectives, 27(4), 375–404. https://doi.org/10.2143/EP.27.4.3289451
  5. Green, Fergus. 2021. Ecological Limits: Science, Justice, Policy and the Good Life. Philosophy Compass, 16, e12740, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12740
  6. Harel Ben-Shahar, Tammy. 2019. Limitarianism and Relative Thresholds, manuscrito no publicado disponible en SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3404687
  7. Herzog, Lisa. Forthcoming. Liberal Egalitarianism beyond Methodological Atomism. In: Ingrid Robeyns (Ed.). Pluralizing Political Philosophy: Economic and Ecological Inequalities in Global Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Hickey, Colin. 2021. Climate Change, Distributive Justice, and “Pre-institutional” Limits on Resource Appropriation, European Journal of Philosophy, 29, 215–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12569
  9. Huseby, Robert. 2022. The Limits of Limitarianism. Journal of Political Philosophy, 3, 230–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12274
  10. Knight, Jack and Schwartzberg, Melissa (Eds). 2017. Wealth. NOMOS LVIII: Yearbook of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy. New York: NYU Press.
  11. Kramm, Matthias and Robeyns, Ingrid. 2020. Limits to Wealth in the History of Western Philosophy, European Journal of Philosophy, 28, 954–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.12535
  12. Malleson, Tom. 2023. Against Inequality. The Practical and Ethical Case for Abolishing the Superrich. New York: Oxford University Press.
  13. Neuhäuser, Christian. 2018. Reichtum als Moralisches Problem. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
  14. Plato. 2016. The Laws. Edited by Malcolm Schofield; translated by Tom Griffith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Platón. 1999. Diálogos VIII y IX. Leyes. Traducido por Francisco Lisi. Madrid: Gredos.
  16. Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknapp Press.
  17. Rawls, John. 2012. Teoría de la justicia. Traducido por María Dolores González. Distrito Federal: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  18. Robeyns, Ingrid. 2017. Having too much. In: Jack Knight and Melissa Schwartzberg (Eds). Wealth. NOMOS LVIII: Yearbook of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy. New York: NYU Press, pp. 1–44.
  19. Robeyns, Ingrid. 2019. What, If Anything, Is Wrong with Extreme Wealth? Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 20, 251–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2019.1633734
  20. Robeyns, Ingrid. 2022. Why Limitarianism? Journal of Political Philosophy, 30(2), pp. 249–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12275
  21. Robeyns, Ingrid, Buskens, Vincent, van de Rijt, Arnout, Vergeldt, Nina and van der Lippe, Tanja. 2021. How Rich Is Too Rich? Measuring the Riches Line, Social Indicators Research, 154, 115–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02552-z
  22. Roemer, John E. 2004. Eclectic Distributional Ethics, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 3(3), 267–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X04046238
  23. Schiessler, Eric. 2021. Spinoza and Economics. In: Yitzhak Y. Melamed (Ed.). A Companion to Spinoza. London: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 410–21.
  24. Schiessler, Eric. 2022. ‘On Hobsbown’ Blogpost. Digressions and Impressions, https://digressionsnimpressions.typepad.com/digressionsimpressions/2022/06/on-hobhouse-with-some-mention-ofpareto-and-rawls.html
  25. Shields, Liam. 2020. Sufficientarianism, Philosophy Compass, 15, e12704. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12704
  26. Singer, Peter. 1972. Famine, Affluence, and Morality, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(3), 229–43.
  27. Summers, Kate, Accominotti, Fabien, Burchardt, Tania, Hecht, Katharina, Mann, Elizabeth, and Mijs, Jonathan. 2022. Deliberating Inequality: A Blueprint for Studying the Social Formation of Beliefs about Economic Inequality, Social Justice Research, 35, 379–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-022-00389-0
  28. Timmer, Dick. 2019. Defending the Democratic Argument to Limitarianism: A Reply to Volacu and Dumitru. Philosophia, 47, 1331–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-018-0030-6
  29. Timmer, Dick. 2021a. Thresholds and Limits in Theories of Distributive Justice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University.
  30. Timmer, Dick. 2021b. Limitarianism: Pattern, Principle, or Presumption? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 38, 760–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/japp.12502
  31. Timmer, Dick. 2021c. Thresholds in Distributive Justice. Utilitas, 33, 422–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820821000194
  32. Timmer, Dick and Neuhäuser, Christian. Eds. 2022. Symposium on Limitarianism. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 25(5), pp. 717–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-022-10354-0
  33. Volacu, Alexandru and Dumitru, Adelin Costin. 2019. Assessing Non-Intrinsic Limitarianism. Philosophia, 47, 249–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-018-9966-9
  34. Zwarthoed, Danielle. 2019. Autonomy-based Reasons for Limitarianism, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 21, 1181–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-018-9958-7