Skip to main content
Open Book Publishers

4. Razones basadas en la autonomía a favor del limitarismo

  • Danielle Zwarthoed (author)
Chapter of: Tener Demasiado: Ensayos Filosóficos sobre el Limitarismo(pp. 103–146)

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.1
  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Metadata
Title4. Razones basadas en la autonomía a favor del limitarismo
ContributorDanielle Zwarthoed (author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0354.04
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0354/chapters/10.11647/obp.0354.04
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
CopyrightDanielle Zwarthoed
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2024-02-19
Long abstractEste artículo pretende dar razones basadas en la autonomía a favor del limitarismo. El limitarismo afirma que es de primordial importancia moral que nadie tenga demasiado. El artículo cuestiona el supuesto estándar de que tener más recursos materiales siempre aumenta la autonomía. Expone cinco mecanismos a través de los cuales tener demasiada riqueza material podría socavar la autonomía. Si estas hipótesis son verdaderas, una teoría de la justicia guiada por una preocupación por la autonomía apoyará una distribución limitarista de la riqueza. Finalmente, el artículo discute dos problemas que el limitarismo basado en la autonomía plantearía. Primero, en la medida en la que la coerción invade la autonomía, ¿las razones basadas en la autonomía legitiman medidas coercitivas para asegurar una distribución limitarista de la riqueza? Segundo, ¿un ethos limitarista es consistente con el incentivo de producir suficiente riqueza para asegurar la justicia distributiva?
Page rangepp. 103–146
Print length44 pages
LanguageSpanish (Translated_into)
Contributors

Danielle Zwarthoed

(author)

Danielle Zwarthoed is a historian and philosopher. At the time of publishing her article that is included in this volume, she was a lecturer at the Chair Hoover at the Université Catholique de Louvain. She is currently pursuing a second PhD-degree at the EHESS in Paris.

References
  1. Angelescu, Laura. 2014. Rich People, an Overview. In Alex C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 5566–69). Dordrecht: Springer, Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2521
  2. Atkinson, Anthony B., Piketty, Thomas & Saez, Emmanuel. 2011. Top Incomes in the Long Run of History. Journal of Economic Literature, 49, 3–71. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.49.1.3
  3. Benson, Paul. 2005. Taking Ownership: Authority and Voice in Autonomous Agency. In Joel Anderson & John Christman (Eds.), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism (pp. 101–26). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610325.007
  4. Blanchflower, David G. & Oswald, Andrew J. 2004. Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1359–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00168-8
  5. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1979. La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Éditions de Minuit.
  6. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1998. La distinción. Criterios y bases sociales del gusto. Traducido por María del Carmen Ruiz de Elvira. Buenos Aires-México: Taurus.
  7. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Questions de sociologie. Paris: Editions de Minuit.
  8. Brickman, Philip, Coates, Dan & Janoff-Bulman, Ronnie. 1978. Lottery winners and accident victims: Is happiness relative? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 917–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.8.917
  9. Casal, Paula. 2007. Why sufficiency is not enough. Ethics, 117, 296–336. https://doi.org/10.1086/510692
  10. Casal, Paula. 2016. “Por qué la suficiencia no basta.” En Igualitarismo: una discusión necesaria, editado por Javier Gallego S. y Thomas Bullemore L., traducido por Javier Gallego Saade, 263–95. Santiago de Chile: Centro de Estudios Públicos.
  11. Christman, J. 1987. Autonomy: a defense of the split-level self. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 23, 281–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1987.tb01623.x
  12. Crouch, Colin. 2003. Commercialization or citizenship: the case of education. In Commercialization or Citizenship: Education Policy and the Future of Public Services. Fabian Society, London.
  13. Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 1999. If We Are So Rich, Why Aren’t We Happy? American Psychologist, 54, 821–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.10.821
  14. Cummins, Robert A. 2000. Personal Income and Subjective Well-being: A Review. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 133–58. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010079728426
  15. Currie, Janet & Gahvari, Firouz. 2008. Transfers in Cash and In-Kind: Theory Meets the Data. Journal of Economic Literature, 46, 333–83. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.46.2.333
  16. Dart, Tom. 2014. Texas Teenager Suffering “affluenza” Avoids Jail for Second Time. In The Guardian, 6 February 2014, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/06/texas-teenager-affluenza-escapes-jail-second-time
  17. Diener, Edward. 2000. Subjective Well-Being: The Science of Happiness and a Proposal for a National Index, American Psychologist, 55, 34–43.
  18. Diener, Edward & Biswas-Diener, Robert. 2002. Will Money Increase Subjective Well-Being? Social Indicators Research, 57, 119–69. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014411319119
  19. Diener, Edward & Oishi, Shigehiro. 2000. Money and happiness: Income and subjective well-being across nations. In Edward Diener & Suh, Eunkook M. (Eds.), Culture and Subjective Well-being (pp. 185–218). Cambridge: MIT Press.
  20. Diener, Edward, Horwitz, Jeff & Emmons, Robert A. 1985. Happiness of the Very Wealthy. Social Indicators Research, 16, 263–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00415126
  21. Dworkin, Gerald. 1988. The Theory and Practice of Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  22. Easterlin, Richard A. 1973. Does Money Buy Happiness? The Public Interest, 30, 3–10.
  23. Easterlin, Richard A. 1995. Will raising the incomes of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27, 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(95)00003-BEasterlin 2001
  24. Eckenroth, Danielle. 2015. Wealthy Justice: The Role Wealth Plays in Sentencing and in the Affluenza Defense Notes. New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement, 41, 443–62.
  25. Elster, Jon. 1982. Sour grapes - utilitarianism and the genesis of wants. In Amartya K. Sen & Bernard Williams (Eds.), Utilitarianism and Beyond (pp. 219–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611964.013
  26. Festinger, Leon. 1962. Cognitive Dissonance. Scientific American, 207, 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1062-93
  27. Frank, Robert H. 1999. Luxury fever: why money fails to satisfy in an era of excess. New York: Free Press.
  28. Frankfurt, Harry G. 1988. The Importance of What We Care About: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818172
  29. Frey, Bruno S. & Stutzer, Alois. 2002. What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research? Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 402–35. https://doi.org/10.1257/002205102320161320
  30. Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  31. Friedman, Marilyn A. 1986. Autonomy and the Split-Level Self. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 24, 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1986.tb00434.x
  32. Gosseries, Alex. 2011. Qu’est-Ce Que Le Suffisantisme? Philosophiques, 38, 465–91. https://doi.org/10.7202/1007460ar
  33. Hume, David. 1751. An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals. London: Printed for A. Millar.
  34. Khader, Serene. J. 2011. Adaptive Preferences and Women’s Empowerment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  35. Kollmuss, Anja & Agyeman, Julian. 2002. Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers to pro-Environmental Behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8, 239–60, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
  36. Mackenzie, Catriona. 2014. Three Dimensions of Autonomy. In Andrea Veltman & Mark Piper (Eds.), Autonomy, Oppression, and Gender (pp. 15–41). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199969104.003.0002
  37. Maurin, Éric. 2009. La peur du déclassement: une sociologie des récessions. Paris: Seuil.
  38. McLeod, Carolyn. 2002. Self-trust and reproductive autonomy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  39. Mirrlees, James A. 1971. An Exploration in the Theory of Optimum Income Taxation. The Review of Economic Studies, 38, 175–208. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296779
  40. Monin, Benoît. 2008. Cognitive Dissonance. In W.A. Darity (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. (pp. 599–601) Farmington Hill, MA: Macmillan.
  41. Morton, Jennifer M. 2011. Toward an Ecological Theory of the Norms of Practical Deliberation. European Journal of Philosophy, 19, 561–84.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0378.2010.00400.x
  42. Musgrave, Richard Abel. 1959. The theory of public finance: a study in public economy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  43. Myers, David G. 2000. The Funds, Friends, and Faith of Happy People. The American Psychologist, 55, 56–67. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.56
  44. Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
  45. Nozick, Robert. 1991. Anarquía, Estado y utopía. Traducido por Rolando Tamayo. Buenos Aires-México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  46. Nussbaum, Martha C. 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  47. Oshana, Marina. 2006. Personal Autonomy in Society. Aldershot, Hants, England; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
  48. Pinçon, Michel & Pinçon-Charlot, Monique. 2016. Sociologie de la bourgeoisie. Paris: La Découverte.
  49. Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  50. Rawls, John. 2012. Teoría de la justicia. Traducido por María Dolores González. Distrito Federal: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  51. Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  52. Rawls, J. (2002). La justicia como equidad. Una reformulación. Editado por Erin Kelly. Barcelona: Paidós.
  53. Raz, Joseph. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  54. Robeyns, Ingrid. 2011. The Capability Approach. In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/capability-approach/.
  55. Robeyns, Ingrid. 2017. Having Too Much. In J. Knight & M. Schwartzberg (Eds.), NOMOS LVII: Wealth. Yearbook of the American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy (pp. 1–44). New York: New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.18574/9781479849291-003
  56. Robeyns, Ingrid. 2018. Where do people put the riches-line [Blog post]. Retrieved from: http://crookedtimber.org/2018/01/06/where-do-people-put-the-riches-line/.
  57. Sen, Amartya. 1985. Commodities and Capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  58. Slemrod, Joel. 2006. The Consequences of Taxation. Social Philosophy & Policy, 23, 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052506060171
  59. Spears, Dean. 2014. Decision costs and price sensitivity: Field experimental evidence from India. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 97, 169–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.06.012
  60. Thurow, Lester C. 1976. Government Expenditures: Cash or In-Kind Aid? Philosophy & Public Affairs, 5, 361–81.
  61. Waldron, Jeremy. 1988. Autonomy and Perfectionism in Raz’s Morality of Freedom Symposium: The Works of Joseph Raz. Southern California Law Review, 62, 1097- 1152.
  62. Westlund, Andrea C. 2009. Rethinking Relational Autonomy. Hypatia, 24, 26–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01056.x
  63. White, Stuart. 2010. A Modest Proposal? Basic Capital vs. Higher Education Subsidies. British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 12, 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2009.00392.x