Skip to main content
Open Book Publishers

2. Tener demasiado

Chapter of: Tener Demasiado: Ensayos Filosóficos sobre el Limitarismo(pp. 17–68)

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: Missing Long Abstract
  • ONIX 2.1
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Metadata
Title2. Tener demasiado
ContributorIngrid Robeyns(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0354.02
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0354/chapters/10.11647/obp.0354.02
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
CopyrightIngrid Robeyns
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2024-02-19
Long abstractEste capítulo es una reimpresión de lo que se ha convertido en el artículo germinal sobre el limitarismo. Tras exponer la distinción entre el limitarismo intrínseco y el instrumental, la primera parte desarrolla dos argumentos a favor del limitarismo: el argumento democrático y el argumento de las necesidades básicas insatisfechas. La segunda parte desarrolla una concepción teórica del “poder de los recursos materiales”, que es la métrica en la que deberíamos poner la línea de riqueza. Después, se discute la distinción entre el limitarismo como una doctrina moral y como una doctrina política. El capítulo concluye respondiendo a dos objeciones contra el limitarismo.
Page rangepp. 17–68
Print length52 pages
LanguageSpanish (Translated_into)
Contributors

Ingrid Robeyns

(author)
Chair in Ethics of Institutions at Utrecht University
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2893-1814

Ingrid Robeyns holds the chair in Ethics of Institutions at Utrecht University. She received her PhD dissertation from Cambridge University in 2003 and has since been publishing widely on questions of distributive justice, inequalities, applied ethics, and methodological considerations. She served as the first Director of the Dutch Research School of Philosophy, as the former director of Utrecht University’s Ethics Institute, and as the eighth president of the Human Development and Capability Association. She has co-edited two edited volumes and three special journal issues, and has previously published the book Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice (2017, https://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0130) with Open Book Publishers. She currently has a contract with Allen Lane (UK) and Astra House (USA) for a trade book on limitarianism (with translation rights sold to seven other publishers), which is scheduled to appear in the winter of 2023–2024.

References
  1. Alkire, Sabina. 2007. Choosing Dimensions: The Capability Approach and Multidimensional Poverty. In Nanak Kakwani & Jacques Silber (Eds.), The Many Dimensions of Poverty (pp.89–199). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  2. Alkire, Sabina & Foster, James. 2011. Counting and Multidimensional Poverty Measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 476–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.11.006.
  3. Anderson, Elizabeth. 1999. What’s the point of Equality? Ethics, 109, 287–337. https://doi.org/10.1086/233897
  4. Anderson, Elizabeth. 2010. Justifying the Capability Approach to Justice. In Harry Brighouse and Ingrid Robeyns (Eds.), Measuring Justice (pp.81–100) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810916.004
  5. Arneson, Richard. 2013. Egalitarianism. In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Open access at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism
  6. Atkinson, Anthony B. & Piketty, Thomas. 2007. Top Incomes over the 20th Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. Becker, Gary. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  8. Beitz, Charles. 1989. Political Equality: An Essay in Democratic Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  9. Bicchieri, Cristina. 2006. The Grammar of Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Broome, John. 2012. Climate Matters. New York: W.W. Norton.
  11. Casal, Paula. 2007. Why sufficiency is not enough. Ethics, 117, 296–336. https://doi.org/10.1086/510692
  12. Casal, Paula. 2016. “Por qué la suficiencia no basta.” En Igualitarismo: una discusión necesaria, editado por Javier Gallego S. y Thomas Bullemore L., traducido por Javier Gallego Saade, 263–95. Santiago de Chile: Centro de Estudios Públicos.
  13. Casal, Paula & Williams, Andrew. 1995. Rights, Equality and Procreation. Analyse und Kritik, 17, 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-1995-0107
  14. Chambers, Clare. 2009. Each Outcome Is Another Opportunity: Problems with the Moment of Equal Opportunity. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, 8, 374–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X09343066
  15. Christiano, Thomas. 2008. The Constitution of Equality: Democratic Authority and Its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198297475.001.0001
  16. Christiano, Thomas. 2010. The Uneasy Relationship between Democracy and Capital. Social Philosophy & Policy, 27, 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052509990082
  17. Christiano, Thomas. 2012. Money in Politics. In David Estlund (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy (pp.241–57). Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376692.013.0013
  18. Claassen, Rutger & Düwell, Marcus. 2013. The Foundations of Capability Theory: Comparing Nussbaum and Gewirth. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 16, 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-012-9361-8
  19. Conly, Sarah. 2005. The Right to Procreation: Merits and Limits. American Philosophical Quarterly, 42, 105–15.
  20. Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. 1999. If We Are So Rich, Why Aren’t We Happy? American Psychologist, 54, 821–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.10.821
  21. Cullety, Garrett. 2004. The Moral Demands of Affluence. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199258112.001.0001
  22. Dworkin, Ronald. 1981a. What Is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10, 198–246.
  23. Dworkin, Ronald. 1981b. Equality of What? Part 2: Equality of Resources. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10, 283–45.
  24. Facundo, Alvaredo, Atkinson, Anthony B., Piketty, Thomas & Saez, Emmanuel. 2013. The top 1 percent in international and historical perspective. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.27.3.3
  25. Folbre, Nancy. 2008. Valuing Children. Rethinking the Economics of the Family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  26. Forst, Rainer. 2012. The Right to Justification. Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice. New York: Columbia University Press.
  27. Frankfurt, Harry. 1987. What’s the point of Equality? Ethics, 98, 21–43.
  28. Gardiner, Stephen, Caney, Simon, Jamieson, Dale, Shue, Henry (Eds.). 2013. Climate Ethics. Essential Readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  29. Goodman, Alissa, Johnson, Paul & Webb, Steven. 1997. Inequality in the UK. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  30. Hacker, Jacob S. & Pierson, Paul. 2010. Winner-Take-All Politics: Public Policy, Political Organization, and the Precipitous Rise of Top Incomes in the United States. Politics & Society, 38, 152–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329210365042
  31. Hausman, Daniel M. & Sensat Waldren, Matt. 2011. Egalitarianism Reconsidered. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 8, 567–86. https://doi.org/10.1163/174552411X601067
  32. Holland, Breena. 2014. Allocating the Earth. A Distributional Framework for Protecting Capabilities in Environmental Law and Policy. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199692071.001.0001
  33. Knight, Jack & Johnson, James. 1997. What Sort of Political Equality Does Deliberative Democracy Require? In James Bohman and William Rehg (Eds.), Deliberative Democracy Essays on Reason and Politics (pp.279–319). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2324.003.0013
  34. Kuklys, Wiebke. 2006. Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach: Theoretical Insights and Empirical Applications. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-28083-9
  35. Machin, Dean J. 2013. Political Inequality and the ‘Super-Rich’: Their Money or (some of) Their Political Rights. Res Publica, 19, 121–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-012-9200-8
  36. Mankiw, N. Gregory. 2013. Defending the One Percent. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27, 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.27.3.21
  37. Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
  38. Nozick, Robert. 1991. Anarquía, Estado y utopía. Traducido por Rolando Tamayo. Buenos Aires-México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  39. Nussbaum, Martha. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality and Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  40. O’Neill, Martin. 2008. What Should Egalitarians Believe? Philosophy & Public Affairs, 36, 119–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2008.00130.x
  41. O’Neill, Martin & Williamson, Thad (Eds.). 2012. Property-Owning Democracy: Rawls and Beyond. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell.
  42. Overall, Christine. 2012. Why Have Children? The Ethical Debate. Boston: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8674.001.0001
  43. Phillips, Anne. 2004. Defending Equality of Outcome. Journal of Political Philosophy, 12, 1–19.
  44. Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  45. Piketty, Thomas & Saez, Emmanuel. 2003. Income Inequality in the United States: 1913–1998. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 68, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535135
  46. Pittman III, Frank S. 1985. Children of the Rich. Family Process, 24, 461–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1985.00461.x
  47. Rawls, John. 1999. A Theory of Justice, Revised Edition. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard.
  48. Rawls, John. 2012. Teoría de la justicia. Traducido por María Dolores González. Distrito Federal: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  49. Robeyns, Ingrid. 2005. The Capability Approach in Practice. Journal of Political Philosophy, 14, 351–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00263.x
  50. Robeyns, Ingrid. 2006. Selecting Capabilities for Quality of Life Measurement. Social Indicators Research, 74, 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-6524-1
  51. Robeyns, Ingrid. 2016. The Capability Approach. In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, open access at http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/capability-approach/
  52. Rowlingson, Karen & McKay, Stephen D. 2011. Wealth and the Wealthy. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
  53. Scanlon, Thomas. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  54. Scanlon, Thomas. 2003. Lo que nos debemos unos a otros. Traducido por Ernesr Weikert García. Barcelona: Editorial Paidós.
  55. Sen, Amartya. 1983. Poor, Relatively Speaking. Oxford Economic Papers, 35, 153–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041587
  56. Sen, Amartya. 1985. Commodities and Capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  57. Sen, Amartya. 1987. The Standard of Living. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  58. Shields, Liam. 2012. The Prospects of Sufficientarianism. Utilitas, 24, 101–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820811000392
  59. Singer, Peter. 1972. Famine, Affluence and Morality. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1, 229–43.
  60. Sønderholm, Jørn. 2013. World Poverty, Positive Duties, and the Overdemandingness Objection. Philosophy, Politics and Economics, 12, 308–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X12447779
  61. Stedman Jones, Daniel. 2012. Masters of the Universe. Hayek, Friedman, and the Birth of Neoliberal Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  62. UNDP. 2011. Human Development Report 2011. New York: Palgrave.
  63. Walzer, Michael. 1981. Philosophy and Democracy. Political Theory, 9, 379–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/009059178100900307
  64. Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice. New York: Basic Books.
  65. Weinberg, Justin. 2009. Norms and the Agency of Justice. Analyse & Kritik, 2, 319–38. https://doi.org/10.1515/auk-2009-0207
  66. Winters, Jeffrey A. 2011. Oligarchy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  67. Wolff, Jonathan & De-Shalit, Avner. 2007. Disadvantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  68. Woolley, Frances R. & Marshall, Judith. 1984. Measuring Inequality within the Household. Review of Income and Wealth, 40, 415–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1994.tb00084.x