Skip to main content
Open Book Publishers

More Eyes on Crime? The Rhetoric of Mediated Mugshots

  • Sarah Young (author)
Chapter of: Introducing Vigilant Audiences(pp. 307–330)

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: Missing Language Code(s)
  • ONIX 2.1
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Metadata
TitleMore Eyes on Crime?
SubtitleThe Rhetoric of Mediated Mugshots
ContributorSarah Young (author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0200.12
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0200/chapters/10.11647/obp.0200.12
Licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
CopyrightSarah Young
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2020-10-14
Long abstractThe “Mugshot of the Day” (MotD) program, run by Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MCSO) in Phoenix, AZ, from 2011 to 2016, allowed the public to vote daily on a favorite mugshot which elevated the top photos to the Office’s leaderboard and often resulted in the increased visibility of female arrestees. I argue that by doing this, MCSO used the exigency of entertainment on participatory platforms to temporarily coalesce a group of digital vigilantes into being, in order to weaponise visibility. Making this claim is complicated, however, and requires not only that online mugshot consumers can be viewed as digital vigilantes, but also the belief that entertainment can facilitate this role and that there can be a relationship between the state and digital vigilantism (DV). Overall, this claim and discussion is beneficial because it not only identifies who digital vigilantes can target but it also contributes to evolving definitions of who can, and how one participates, in vigilantism in a digital world.
Page rangepp. 307-330
Print length23 pages