| Title | The Genesis of the Self |
|---|---|
| Contributor | George Herbert Mead (author) |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.32376/3f8575cb.297ffefc |
| Landing page | https://www.mediastudies.press/pub/mead-genesis/ |
| License | https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ |
| Publisher | mediastudies.press |
| Published on | 2021-07-15 |
| Short abstract | THE SELF THAT is central to all so-called mental experience has appeared only in the social conduct of human vertebrates. |
| Long abstract | THE SELF THAT is central to all so-called mental experience has appeared only in the social conduct of human vertebrates. It is just because the individual finds himself taking the attitudes of the others who are involved in his conduct that he becomes an object for himself. It is only by taking the rôles of others that we have been able to come back to ourselves. […] It is interesting to note that in the development of the individual child, there are two stages which present the two essential steps in attaining self-consciousness. The first stage is that of play, and the second that of the game, where these two are distinguished from each other. In play in this sense, the child is continually acting as a parent, a teacher, a preacher, a grocery man, a policeman, a pirate, or an Indian. It is the period of childish existence which Wordsworth has described as that of “endless imitation.” It is the period of Froebel’s kindergarten plays. In it, as Froebel recognized, the child is acquiring the rôles of those who belong to his society. This takes place because the child is continually exciting in himself the responses to his own social acts. In his infant dependence upon the responses of others to his own social stimuli, he is peculiarly sensitive to this relation. Having in his own nature the beginning of the parental response, he calls it out by his own appeals. The doll is the universal type of this, but before he plays with a doll, he responds in tone of voice and in attitude as his parents respond to his own cries and chortles. [...] That is, one calls or tends to call out in himself the same response that he calls out in the other. |