Skip to main content
Open Book Publishers

14. Living next to Etosha National Park: The case of Ehi-Rovipuka

Chapter of: Etosha Pan to the Skeleton Coast: Conservation Histories, Policies and Practices in North-west Namibia(pp. 375–402)

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.1
  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Metadata
Title14. Living next to Etosha National Park
SubtitleThe case of Ehi-Rovipuka
ContributorArthur Hoole (author)
Sian Sullivan(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0402.14
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0402/chapters/10.11647/obp.0402.14
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
CopyrightArthur Hoole; Sian Sullivan
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2024-08-02
Long abstractThis chapter considers the implications of being park-adjacent for ovaHerero pastoralists now living in Ehi-Rovipuka Conservancy. Using PhD research conducted in 2006 and 2007 as a baseline, the chapter focuses on three dimensions. First, some aspects of the complex and remembered histories of association with the western part of what is now Etosha National Park (ENP) are traced via a “memory mapping” methodology with ovaHerero elders. Second, experiences of living next to the park boundary are recounted and analysed, drawing on a structured survey with forty respondents. Most interviewees indicated that no benefits were received at the time from the national park. They also expressed desires for grazing rights––especially for emergency grazing during dry periods, as well as access to ancestral birthplaces, graves and traditional resource use areas, and involvement in joint tourism development ventures inside the park. Finally, different dimensions of local knowledge are recounted, including of wildlife presence and mobilities through the wider region, “veld-foods”, and school-children’s perceptions of ENP and the conservancy. Although the research reported here was carried out some years ago, circumstances in Ehi-Rovipuka have changed rather little. The conservancy remains along the border of a national park, and peoples’ histories of utilising, moving through, and being born and desiring to be buried in the western reaches of the park remain. The chapter argues that more awareness of how social, ecological and historical dimensions of the broader Etosha landscape are connected is essential for achieving biodiversity conservation outcomes.
Page rangepp. 375–402
Print length28 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Contributors

Arthur Hoole

(author)

Arthur Hoole is Canadian and he enjoyed a long and diverse career in park planning, wildlife conservation and environmental assessment. Early on he completed park planning assignments in Canada’s Banff National Park, Kluane National Park Reserve, Yukon and Nahanni National Park Reserve, among many other protected area planning and resource management projects in Western Canada. He then worked internationally, as a national parks advisor in Antigua and Barbuda, West Indies, followed by five years living in Zimbabwe as an advisor on natural resource management policies and programmes. These assignments engaged him with indigenous and local communities and his work focused on indigenous and local community governance in resource management and conservation. This culminated in his doctoral research interest in Namibia and the Etosha-Kunene region. He completed his PhD at the Natural Resources Institute, University of Manitoba, much inspired by his principal advisor Professor Fikret Berkes.

Sian Sullivan

(author)
Professor of Environment and Culture at Bath Spa University
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0522-8843
http://www.futurepasts.net/

Sian Sullivan is Professor of Environment and Culture at Bath Spa University. She is interested in discourses and practices of difference and exclusion in relation to ecology and conservation. She has carried out long-term research on conservation, colonialism, and culture in Namibia (www.futurepasts.net and www.etosha-kunene-histories.net), and also engages critically with the financialisation of nature (see www.the-natural-capital-myth.net). She has co-edited Political Ecology: Science, Myth and Power (2000), Contributions to Law, Philosophy and Ecology: Exploring Re-embodiments (2016), Valuing Development, Environment and Conservation: Creating Values that Matter (2018), and Negotiating Climate Change in Crisis (2021).

References
  1. Andersson, C.J. 1861. Lake Ngami or Explorations and Discovery During Four Years of Wanderings in the Wilds of Southwestern Africa. New York: Harper & Brothers.
  2. Berry, H.H. 1997. Historical review of the Etosha region and its subsequent administration as a National Park. Madoqua 20(1): 3–10, https://hdl.handle.net/10520/AJA10115498_453
  3. Berry, H.H., Rocher, C.J.V., Paxton, M. and Copper, T. 1997. Origin and meaning of place names in Etosha National Park. Madoqua 20(1): 13–35, https://journals.co.za/doi/pdf/10.10520/AJA10115498_454
  4. Blaikie, P. 2006. Is small really beautiful? Community-based natural resource management in Malawi and Botswana. World Development 34(11): 1942–57, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.023
  5. Ehi-Rovipuka Conservancy 2002. Annual Natural Resources Report. Otjokavare, Namibia.
  6. Ehi-Rovipuka Conservancy 2003. Annual Natural Resources Report. Otjokavare, Namibia.
  7. Ehi-Rovipuka Conservancy 2004. Annual Natural Resources Report. Otjokavare, Namibia.
  8. Ehi-Rovipuka Conservancy 2005. Annual Natural Resources Report. Otjokavare, Namibia.
  9. Hauptfleisch, M., Blaum, N., Liehr, S., Hering, R., Kraus, R., Tausendfruend, M., Cimenti, A., Lüdtke, D., Rauchecker, M. and Uiseb, K. 2024. Trends and barriers to wildlife-based options for sustainable management of savanna resources: The Namibian case. In von Maltitz, G.P., Midgley, G.F., Veitch, J., Brümmer, C., Rötter, R.P., Viehberg, F.A. and Veste, M. (eds.) Sustainability of Southern African Ecosystems Under Global Change. Berlin: Springer Nature, 499–525, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10948-5_18
  10. Hinz, W.O. 2003. Without Chiefs There Would be No Game: Customary Law and Nature Conservation. Windhoek: Out of Africa Publishers.
  11. Hoole, A.F. 2008. Community-Based Conservation and Protected Areas in Namibia: Social-Ecological Linkages for Biodiversity. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Manitoba.
  12. Hoole, A. and Berkes, F. 2010. Breaking down fences: Recoupling social-ecological systems for biodiversity conservation in Namibia. Geoforum 41(2): 304–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.10.009
  13. Infield, M. 2001. Cultural values: A forgotten strategy for building community support for protected areas in Africa. Conservation Biology 13(3): 800–02, https://www.jstor.org/stable/3061464
  14. Malan, J.S. and Owen-Smith, G.L. 1974. The ethnobotany of Kaokoland. Cimbebasia. (B) 2(5): 131–78.
  15. NACSO 2004. Namibia’s Communal Conservancies: A Review of Progress 2003. Windhoek: Namibian Association of CBNRM Support Organisations.
  16. NACSO, 2006. Namibia’s Communal Conservancies: A Review of Progress and Challenges in 2005. NACSO. Windhoek.
  17. Rudner, I. and Rudner, J. 1974[1899]. Journey in Africa Through Angola, Ovampoland and Damaraland 1895-1896 by P. Möller. C. Struik: Cape Town.
  18. Stander P. and Esterhuizen, A. n.d. Detailed Survey on the State of Human Wildlife Conflict in Ehi-rovipuka and Omatendeka Conservancies. Ministry of Environment and Tourism ICEMA Project. Windhoek.
  19. Sullivan, S. 1998. People, Plants and Practice in Drylands: Sociopolitical and Ecological Dynamics of Resource Use by Damara Farmers in Arid North-west Namibia, including Annexe of Damara Ethnobotany. Ph.D. Anthropology, University College London, http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1317514/
  20. Sullivan, S. 1999. Folk and formal, local and national: Damara knowledge and community conservation in southern Kunene, Namibia. Cimbebasia 15: 1–28.
  21. Sullivan, S. 2002. ‘How can the rain fall in this chaos?’ Myth and metaphor in representations of the north-west Namibian landscape. In LeBeau, D. and Gordon, R.J. (eds.) Challenges for Anthropology in the ‘African Renaissance’: A Southern African Contribution. Windhoek: University of Namibia Press, 255–265, 315–317.
  22. Sullivan, S. 2005. Detail and dogma, data and discourse: Food-gathering by Damara herders and conservation in arid north-west Namibia. In Homewood, K. (ed.) Rural Resources and Local Livelihoods in Sub-Saharan Africa. Oxford: James Currey and University of Wisconsin Press, 63–99, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-06615-2_4
  23. World Resources Institute, UNDP, UNEP and World Bank 2005. World Resources 2005: The Wealth of the Poor-Managing Ecosystems to Fight Poverty. Washington: World Resources Institute.