Radboud University Press
Rereading Eichmann in Jerusalem
- Hannah Marije Altorf (author)
Export Metadata
- ONIX 3.1
- ONIX 3.0
- Thoth
- Project MUSECannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
- OAPENCannot generate record: Missing PDF URL
- JSTORCannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
- Google BooksCannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
- OverDriveCannot generate record: Missing Language Code(s)
- ONIX 2.1
- EBSCO HostCannot generate record: No PDF or EPUB URL
- ProQuest EbraryCannot generate record: No PDF or EPUB URL
- EBSCO Host
- CSV
- JSON
- OCLC KBARTCannot generate record: Missing Landing Page
- BibTeX
- CrossRef DOI depositCannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
- MARC 21 RecordCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
- MARC 21 MarkupCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
- MARC 21 XMLCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Title | Rereading Eichmann in Jerusalem |
---|---|
Contributor | Hannah Marije Altorf (author) |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.54195/HSOV8373_CH12 |
License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
Publisher | Radboud University Press |
Published on | 2024-05-16 |
Long abstract | Hannah Marije Altorf, in her contribution, “Rereading <i>Eichmann in Jerusalem</i>,” tracks the dispute that emerged on Arendt’s <i>Eichmann in Jerusalem</i> (1963), one of the most controversial works of the twentieth century. The focus of the dispute has changed over time, though one constant is the accuracy of the facts presented. Whereas the debate of the facts is important, it will not take away the controversy, because facts never appear in isolation, but are always part of an arrangement or larger story. What is more, such a dispute can hide some causes of the controversy. Altorf offers a reading of <i>Eichmann in Jerusalem</i> that considers two stories as pivotal, namely the stories about two Germans, Feldwebel Anton Schmidt and Probst Heinrich Grüber. The reading shows that Arendt’s primary focus is on moral questions and moral collapse. |
Keywords |
|
Contributors
Hannah Marije Altorf
(author)Hannah Marije Altorf is a research fellow at the Iris Murdoch Research Centre, University of Chichester. She has written on the philosophical and literary works of Iris Murdoch and different forms of philosophical dialogue. She is the author of Iris Murdoch and the Art of Imagining (Continuum 2008) and, together with Mariëtte Willemsen, she translated The Sovereignty of Good into Dutch (Boom 2003). She is an experienced facilitator of Socratic dialogues in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, and Germany and is writing a book on public philosophy, tentatively called Thinking in Public.