punctum books
Extraterritorial State Action in the Global Interest: The Promise of Unilateralism
- Cedric Ryngaert (author)
Chapter of: Extraterritorialities in Occupied Worlds(pp. 215–241)
Export Metadata
- ONIX 3.0
- ThothCannot generate record: No publications supplied
- Project MUSECannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
- OAPENCannot generate record: Missing PDF URL
- JSTORCannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
- Google BooksCannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
- OverDriveCannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
- Thoth
- ONIX 2.1
- EBSCO HostCannot generate record: No PDF or EPUB URL
- ProQuest EbraryCannot generate record: No PDF or EPUB URL
- EBSCO Host
- CSV
- JSON
- OCLC KBART
- BibTeX
- CrossRef DOI depositCannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
- MARC 21 RecordCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
- MARC 21 MarkupCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
- MARC 21 XMLCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Title | Extraterritorial State Action in the Global Interest |
---|---|
Subtitle | The Promise of Unilateralism |
Contributor | Cedric Ryngaert (author) |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.21983/P3.0131.1.14 |
Landing page | https://punctumbooks.com/titles/extraterritorialities-in-occupied-worlds/ |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
Copyright | Ryngaert, Cedric |
Publisher | punctum books |
Published on | 2016-02-16 |
Long abstract | Ad-vocates of “global justice” or “cosmopolitanism” propound that ethical duties are universal, and apply regardless of nationality, citizenship, race etc. In pure cosmo-politanism, individuals owe ethical duties towards other individuals who are worse off, wherever on earth they may be. Individual agency is not particularly practical, however. Therefore, global justice advocates have proposed to mediate individuals’ ethical duties via institutions, in particular international (gov-ernmental) organizations.1 In this institutional view, international organizations ought to be oriented towards furthering cosmopolitan ideals and tackling collective action problems, such as protecting human rights and the environment, guaranteeing collective security, and ensuring distributive justice, in particular alleviating world poverty.2 Some such in-stitutions, such as the United Nations, have been duly created. But because of design faults, political unwillingness, or resource limits, they have not been able to deliver on the promises they initially held: human rights are still trampled on, corruption remains rampant, and global warming contin-ues unabated. |
Page range | pp. 215–241 |
Print length | 27 pages |
Language | English (Original) |
Contributors