Skip to main content
Open Book Publishers

1. De Morgan and Mathematics

Chapter of: Augustus De Morgan, Polymath: New Perspectives on his Life and Legacy(pp. 2–28)

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Metadata
Title1. De Morgan and Mathematics
ContributorAdrian Rice(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0408.01
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0408/chapters/10.11647/obp.0408.01
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
CopyrightAdrian Rice
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2024-09-04
Long abstractIf Augustus De Morgan is remembered at all today, it is primarily for the pair of algebraic laws that bear his name, for he proved no major theorem, made no notable mathematical discoveries, and published no magnum opus. Indeed, it is hard to identify much in today’s mathematics for which he was responsible. Yet he was described by contemporaries as ‘one of the most eminent mathematicians and logicians of his time’ and ‘one of the profoundest and subtlest thinkers of the nineteenth century’. And his mathematical publications spanned a far greater array of subjects than his current limited fame would suggest, including algebra, logic, probability, actuarial mathematics, differential equations, mathematical education, and the history of mathematics—some of which will be discussed in more detail in subsequent chapters. In this chapter, we explore the range of De Morgan’s activities as a mathematician, including his mathematical research, his philosophy of the subject, and his work as the first professor of mathematics at University College London. In doing so, we aim to answer two questions: why was De Morgan’s mathematical reputation so high in the nineteenth century? And why, in comparison, is he so little-known today?
Page rangepp. 2–28
Print length27 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Contributors

Adrian Rice

(author)
Dorothy and Muscoe Garnett Professor of Mathematics at Randolph–Macon College
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8731-312X

Adrian Rice is the Dorothy and Muscoe Garnett Professor of Mathematics at Randolph-Macon College, Virginia, USA. He has held visiting positions at the University of Virginia (1998-99) and the University of Oxford (2014-15). His research focuses on the history of mathematics in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, with particular emphasis on the work of Augustus De Morgan. Previous books include Mathematics in Victorian Britain, co-edited with Raymond Flood and Robin Wilson (Oxford University Press, 2011) and Ada Lovelace: The Making of a Computer Scientist, co-authored with Christopher Hollings and Ursula Martin (Bodleian Library, 2018).

References
  1. Anon, ‘Our Book Shelf’, Nature, 7 July 1870, 186.
  2. Bell, Eric Temple, Men of Mathematics (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1937).
  3. Benson, James Bourne, ‘Some Recollections of University College in the Sixties’, MS (1921), UCL Special Collections, Materials for the history of UCL, Mem. 1B/3.
  4. Boole, George, The Mathematical Analysis of Logic (Cambridge: Macmillan, 1847).
  5. De Morgan, Augustus, ‘An Introductory Lecture delivered at the Opening of the Mathematical Classes in the University of London, Novr. 5th, 1828’, UCL Special Collections, MS ADD 3.
  6. ―, On the Study and Difficulties of Mathematics (London: Baldwin & Cradock, 1831).
  7. ―, The Elements of Algebra (London: Taylor & Walton, 1835).
  8. ―, A Treatise on the Calculus of Functions (London: Baldwin & Cradock, 1836). [Later published in Encyclopaedia Metropolitana, Pure Sciences, 2 (1845), 305–92.]
  9. ―, A Treatise on the Theory of Probabilities (London: Baldwin & Cradock, 1837). [Later published in Encyclopaedia Metropolitana, Pure Sciences, 2 (1845), 393–490.]
  10. [―], Review of Théorie Analytique des Probabilités (by P.-S. Laplace), Dublin Review, 3 (1837), 237–48, 338–54.
  11. ―, ‘Mathematics’, in The Penny Cyclopaedia, ed. by George Long, 15 (London: Charles Knight, 1839), pp. 11–14.
  12. ―, ‘On the Foundation of Algebra II’, Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 7 (1841), 287–300.
  13. ―, ‘Probability, Probabilities, Theory of’, in The Penny Cyclopaedia, ed. by George Long, 19 (London: Charles Knight, 1841), pp. 24–30.
  14. ―, The Differential and Integral Calculus (London: Baldwin & Cradock, 1842).
  15. ―, ‘On Divergent Series and Various Points of Analysis Connected with Them’, Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 8 (1844), 182–203.
  16. ―, ‘On the equation (D + a)n y = X’, Cambridge Mathematical Journal, 4 (1844), 60–62.
  17. ―, ‘On the Foundation of Algebra, No. IV, on Triple Algebra’, Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 8 (1844), 241–54.
  18. ―, ‘Algebra’, in Supplement to the Penny Cyclopaedia, ed. by George Long (London: Charles Knight, 1845), vol. 1, pp. 74–78.
  19. ―, Trigonometry and Double Algebra (London: Taylor, Walton, & Maberly, 1849).
  20. ―, ‘On Some Points in the History of Arithmetic’, Companion to the Almanac for 1851, 5–18.
  21. ―, ‘The Progress of the Doctrine of the Earth’s Motion between the Times of Copernicus and Galileo, being Notes on the Ante-Galilean Copernicans’, Companion to the Almanac for 1855, 5–25.
  22. ―, ‘On the Syllogism, No. III and on Logic in General’, Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 10 (1858), 173–320.
  23. [―], Review of William Whewell’s Novum organum renovatum, The Athenæum, 1628 (8 January 1859), 42–44.
  24. [―], Review of William Whewell’s The Philosophy of Discovery, The Athenæum, 1694 (14 April 1860), 501–03.
  25. ―, ‘Speech of Professor De Morgan, President, At the First Meeting of the Society, January 16th, 1865’, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 1st ser., 1 (1865), 1–9.
  26. ―, On the Syllogism, and Other Logical Writings, ed. by Peter Heath (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1966).
  27. Despeaux, Sloan Evans, and Adrian C. Rice, ‘Augustus De Morgan’s Anonymous Reviews for The Athenæum: A Mirror of a Victorian Mathematician’, Historia Mathematica, 43 (2016), 148–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hm.2015.09.001
  28. Durand-Richard, Marie-José, ‘Genèse de l’algèbre en Angleterre: une influence possible de J. Locke’, Revue d’Histoire des Sciences, 43 (1990), 129–80.
  29. Gaither, Carl C., and Alma E. Cavazos-Gaither, ed., Gaither’s Dictionary of Scientific Quotations (New York: Springer, 2012).
  30. Groetsch, C. W., ‘De Morgan’s Series Test’, The College Mathematics Journal, 47 (2016), 136–37. https://doi.org/10.4169/college.math.j.47.2.136
  31. Guicciardini, Niccolò, The Development of Newtonian Calculus in Britain 1700-1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).
  32. Halsted, George Bruce, ‘De Morgan to Sylvester’, The Monist, 10 (1900), 188–97.
  33. Hamilton, William Rowan, Lectures on Quaternions (Dublin: Hodges & Smith, 1853).
  34. Hardy, G. H., Divergent Series (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1949).
  35. Heinemann, Anna-Sophie, Quantifikation des Prädikats und Numerisch Definiter Syllogismus. Die Kontroverse zwischen Augustus De Morgan und Sir William Hamilton: Formale Logik zwischen Algebra und Syllogistik (Münster: Mentis, 2015).
  36. Hobart, Michael E., and Joan L. Richards, ‘De Morgan’s Logic’, in Handbook of the History of Logic. Volume 4: British Logic in the Nineteenth Century, ed. by Dov M. Gabbay and John Woods (Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2008), pp. 283–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1874-5857(08)80010-6
  37. Hodgkin, Thomas, ‘University College, London, Fifty Years Ago’, The Northerner, 1 (1901), 75.
  38. Hollings, Christopher, Ursula Martin and Adrian Rice, ‘The Lovelace–De Morgan Mathematical Correspondence: A Critical Re-appraisal’, Historia Mathematica, 44 (2017), 202–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hm.2017.04.001
  39. ―, Ada Lovelace: The Making of a Computer Scientist (Oxford: Bodleian Library Publishing, 2018).
  40. Jevons, William Stanley, ‘De Morgan, Augustus’, Encyclopædia Britannica, 9th edn, vol. 8 (Edinburgh: Adam & Charles Black, 1877), pp. 64–67.
  41. Katz, Victor J., and Karen Hunger Parshall, Taming the Unknown: A History of Algebra from Antiquity to the Early Twentieth Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2014). https://doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691149059.001.0001
  42. Kline, Morris, Mathematical Thought From Ancient to Modern Times (New York: Oxford University Press, 1972).
  43. Koppelman, Elaine, ‘The Calculus of Operations and the Rise of Abstract Algebra’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 8 (1971–72), 155–242.
  44. Laíta, Luis María, ‘Influences on Boole’s Logic: The Controversy between William Hamilton and Augustus De Morgan’, Annals of Science, 36 (1979), 45–65.
  45. Merrill, Daniel D., Augustus De Morgan and the Logic of Relations (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2047-7
  46. Panteki, Maria, ‘French “logique” and British “logic”: On the Origins of Augustus De Morgan’s Early Logical Inquiries, 1805–1835’, Historia Mathematica, 30 (2003), 278–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0315-0860(03)00025-9
  47. Pycior, Helena M. ‘Augustus De Morgan’s Algebraic Work: The Three Stages’, Isis, 74 (1983), 211–26. https://doi.org/10.1086/353244
  48. Ranyard, Arthur Cowper, Obituary Notice of Augustus De Morgan, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 32 (1871–72), 112–18.
  49. Rice, Adrian, ‘Augustus De Morgan: Historian of Science’, History of Science, 34 (1996), 201–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/007327539603400203
  50. ―, ‘Mathematics in the Metropolis: A Survey of Victorian London’, Historia Mathematica, 23 (1996), 376–417. https://doi.org/10.1006/hmat.1996.0039
  51. ―, ‘What Makes a Great Mathematics Teacher? The Case of Augustus De Morgan’, The American Mathematical Monthly, 106 (1999), 534–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/2589465
  52. Rice, Adrian C., Robin J. Wilson, and J. Helen Gardner, ‘From Student Club to National Society: The Founding of the London Mathematical Society in 1865’, Historia Mathematica, 22 (1995), 402–21. https://doi.org/10.1006/hmat.1995.1032
  53. Richards, Joan L., ‘Augustus De Morgan, the History of Mathematics, and the Foundations of Algebra’, Isis, 78 (1987), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1086/354328
  54. Roscoe, Henry Enfield, The Life and Experiences of Sir Henry Enfield Roscoe (London: Macmillan, 1906).
  55. Rouse Ball, Walter William, A History of the Study of Mathematics at Cambridge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1889).
  56. Russell, A. S., ‘Augustus De Morgan, a Forgotten Worthy’, The Listener, 14 (24 Dec. 1935), 1161.
  57. Smith, David Eugene, History of Mathematics, 2 vols. (Boston: Ginn, 1923).
  58. Yeldham, Florence A., The Teaching of Arithmetic through Four Hundred Years 1535–1935 (London: Harran, 1936).