Skip to main content
Open Book Publishers

10. What Does It Mean to Open Education? Perspectives on Using Open Educational Resources at a US Public University

  • Linda Vanasupa (author)
  • Amy Wiley (author)
  • Lizabeth Schlemer (author)
  • Dana Ospina (author)
  • Peter Schwartz (author)
  • Deborah Wilhelm (author)
  • Catherine Waitinas (author)
  • Kellie Hall (author)
Chapter of: Open Education: International Perspectives in Higher Education(pp. 199–220)

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
      Cannot generate record: Missing PDF URL
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: Missing Long Abstract
  • ONIX 2.1
    • EBSCO Host
      Cannot generate record: No PDF or EPUB URL
    • ProQuest Ebrary
      Cannot generate record: No PDF or EPUB URL
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Metadata
Title10. What Does It Mean to Open Education? Perspectives on Using Open Educational Resources at a US Public University
ContributorLinda Vanasupa (author)
Amy Wiley (author)
Lizabeth Schlemer (author)
Dana Ospina (author)
Peter Schwartz (author)
Deborah Wilhelm (author)
Catherine Waitinas (author)
Kellie Hall (author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0103.10
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0103/chapters/10.11647/obp.0103.10
Licensehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
CopyrightLinda Vanasupa; Amy Wiley; Lizabeth Schlemer; Dana Ospina; Peter Schwartz; Deborah Wilhelm; Catherine Waitinas; Kellie Hall
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2016-12-19
Page rangepp. 199-220
Print length21 pages
References
  1. About Carnegie Classification (2015), The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu
  2. Argyris, C. and Schön, D. A. (1989), Participatory Action Research and Action Science Compared, American Behavioral Scientist, 32(5), pp. 612–623, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002764289032005008
  3. Böhm, D. (1996), On Dialogue, London and New York: Routledge.
  4. Brint, S., Riddle M., Turk-Bicakci, L. and Levy, C. S. (2005), From the Liberal to the Practical Arts in American Colleges and Universities: Organizational Analysis and Curricular Change, Journal of Higher Education, 76, pp. 151–180, http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2005.0011
  5. Cech, E. A. (2014), Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education?, Science, Technology & Human Values, 39(1), pp. 42–72, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0162243913504305
  6. Eliot, T. S. (1920), The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock, Prufrock and Other Observations, New York: Routledge.
  7. Fiere, P. (1970), Pedagogy of the Oppressed (trans. by M. B. Ramos), New York: Continuum.
  8. Finkel, D. L. (2000), Teaching with Your Mouth Shut, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  9. Government Accountability Office (2013), College Textbooks: Students Have Greater Access to Textbook Information, http://www.gao.gov/assets/660/655066.pdf
  10. Hesse-Biber, S. N. and Leavy, P. (Eds.) (2010), Handbook of Emergent Methods, New York: Guilford Press.
  11. Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2015), Emotions, Learning, and the Brain: Exploring the Educational Implications of Affective Neuroscience (The Norton Series on the Social Neuroscience of Education), New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
  12. Jaegers, S. S. and Baily, T. (2010), Effectiveness of Fully Online Courses for College Students: Response to a Department of Education Meta-analysis, Community College Research Center, Columbia University, http://ccrc.tc.columbia.edu/publications/effectiveness-fully-online-courses.html
  13. Koch, J. (2014), An Economic Analysis of the Market for Textbooks: Current Conditions, New Developments and Policy Options [Online Conference Proceedings], http://www.jamesvkoch.com/uploads/Turning_the_Page_Lumina_Foundation_0713.pdf
  14. Krishnamurti [n.d.], Education and the Significance of Life, Chapter 2: The Right Kind of Education, http://www.jkrishnamurti.org/krishnamurti-teachings/view-text.php?tid=51&chid=66907
  15. Krishnamurti (1953), Second Talk in Madras, Krishnamurti’s Talks 1953 (Verbatim Report), Madras. J. Krishnamurti online, http://www.jkrishnamurti.org
  16. Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba. E. G. (1985), Naturalistic Inquiry, Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
  17. Leung, L. (2015), Should a Cal State Fullerton Math Professor be Forced to Have His Students Use $180 Textbook, Written by his Boss?, Orange County Register, http://www.ocregister.com/articles/bourget-688288-math-book.html
  18. McKeachie, W. J. and Svinicki, M. (Eds.) (2006), The College or University Culture, McKeachie’s Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research and Theory for College and University Teachers. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
  19. Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M. and Jones, K. (2010), Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies, U.S. Department of Education: Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development Policy and Program Studies Service, http://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/final report.pdf
  20. Mills, J., Bonner, A. and K. Francis (2006), The Development of Constructivist Grounded Theory, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, pp. 1–10.
  21. Northoff, G., Duncan, N. W. and Hayes, D. J. (2010), The Brain and its Resting State Activity — Experimental and Methodological Implications, Progress in Neurobiology, 92(4), pp. 593–600, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.09.002
  22. Reason, P. and Torbert, W. (2001), The Action Turn: Toward a Transformational Social Science, Concepts and Transformation, 6(1), pp. 1–37, http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/cat.6.1.02rea
  23. Saldana, J. (2012), The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, London: Sage Publications Ltd., http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-273-9
  24. Schwartz, P. (2016), Full Curricula for Two Classes: (1) Calculus Based Introductory Mechanics, and (2) Energy, Society, and the Environment, http://sharedcurriculum.wikispaces.com
  25. Senack, E. and Student Public Interest Research Groups (2014), Fixing the Broken Textbook Market: How Students Respond to High Textbook Costs and Demand Alternatives, http://www.studentpirgs.org/sites/student/files/reports/NATIONAL Fixing Broken Textbooks Report1.pdf
  26. Spreng, R. N., Stevens, W. D., Chamberlain, J. P., Gilmore, A. W. and Schacter, D. L. (2010), Default Network Activity, Coupled with the Frontoparietal Control Network, Supports Goal-directed Cognition, Neuroimage, 53(1), pp. 303–317, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.016
  27. Torbert, W. R. (1981), Why Educational Research has Been so Uneducational: The Case for a New Model of Social Science Based on Collaborative Inquiry, in P. Reason and J. Rowan (Eds.), Human Inquiry: A Sourcebook of New Paradigm Research, pp. 141–151, Chichester: Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
  28. Wright, M. C., Assar, N., Kain, E. L., Kramer, L., Howery, C. B., McKinney, K., et al. (2004), Greedy Institutions: The Importance of Institutional Context for Teaching in Higher Education, Teaching Sociology, 32(2), pp. 144–159, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0092055x0403200201
  29. Rossman, G. B. and Rallis, S. F. (1998), Learning in the Field: An Introduction to Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks: Sage.