Radboud University Press
Ubuntu Worldview as a Condition of Possibility for National Unity
- Antoinette Kankindi(author)
Export Metadata
- ONIX 3.1
- ONIX 3.0
- Thoth
- Project MUSECannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
- OAPENCannot generate record: Missing PDF URL
- JSTORCannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
- Google BooksCannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
- OverDriveCannot generate record: Missing Language Code(s)
- ONIX 2.1
- EBSCO HostCannot generate record: No PDF or EPUB URL
- ProQuest EbraryCannot generate record: No PDF or EPUB URL
- EBSCO Host
- CSV
- JSON
- OCLC KBARTCannot generate record: Missing Landing Page
- BibTeX
- CrossRef DOI depositCannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
- MARC 21 RecordCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
- MARC 21 MarkupCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
- MARC 21 XMLCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Title | Ubuntu Worldview as a Condition of Possibility for National Unity |
---|---|
Contributor | Antoinette Kankindi(author) |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.54195/FLRI3273_CH10 |
License | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
Publisher | Radboud University Press |
Published on | 2023-11-30 |
Long abstract | The spirit of Bandung can be summarized in the aspiration that the fate of Asian and African countries was neither to be determined by the Cold War divide, nor decided by the great metropolises of the world. Asia and Africa, 68 years later, have followed different paths. The Asian-African solidarity did not survive. The reason for this could be the fact that there was a difference between the <i>Ubuntu</i> solidarity and the many ideologies as well as influences that prevailed at the conference. This backdrop explains why the conference has not had a significant resonance in Africa, mainly in terms of national unity, which remains an aspiration. An examination of what was at play at Bandung indicates a few factors that could have made that aspiration achievable, even though such factors were either sidelined or overlooked. Using V. Y. Mudimbe and Kwasi Wiredu’s perspectives on African solidarity, this paper explores the different influences that carried the day at the conference. The aim is to show how the principle of solidarity derived from “<i>Ubuntu</i>” worldview as a condition of possibility for national unity was overlooked, yet it is the one needed for true nation-building. The conclusion of the paper demonstrates why the Bandung Conference, by inscribing itself in the line of global policy and international conferences underlying such policy, embraced the limitations that come from all globalizing attempts. Those attempts are bound to fail because of ignoring local values. Finally, the conclusion sketches the typically African values that happen to be, in reality, universal and, as such, might be the pillars of a battle against new forms of colonization hidden in global policies. |
Keywords |
|
Contributors
Antoinette Kankindi
(author)Antoinette Kankindi is Senior Lecturer teaching Ethics and Social Political Foundations of Law at the Law School, Strathmore University, Kenya. She is also a Research Fellow leading the Integrity Program working on mainstreaming Ethics and Integrity in public life. Kankindi has published studies in the area of the relationship between Ethics and Politics. Other research interests of hers cover political legitimacy, historical and new interpretations of the republican and liberal democracy traditions, as well as their impact on African ideals, values and institutions.