punctum books
Outward Bound: On Quentin Meillassoux's After Finitude
- Christian Thorne (author)
Chapter of: Speculations 3(pp. 273–289)
Export Metadata
- ONIX 3.0
- ThothCannot generate record: No publications supplied
- Project MUSECannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
- OAPENCannot generate record: Missing PDF URL
- JSTORCannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
- Google BooksCannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
- OverDriveCannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
- Thoth
- ONIX 2.1
- EBSCO HostCannot generate record: No PDF or EPUB URL
- ProQuest EbraryCannot generate record: No PDF or EPUB URL
- EBSCO Host
- CSV
- JSON
- OCLC KBART
- BibTeX
- CrossRef DOI depositCannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
- MARC 21 RecordCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
- MARC 21 MarkupCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
- MARC 21 XMLCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Title | Outward Bound |
---|---|
Subtitle | On Quentin Meillassoux's After Finitude |
Contributor | Christian Thorne (author) |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.21983/P3.0010.1.12 |
Landing page | https://punctumbooks.com/titles/speculations-iii/ |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ |
Copyright | Thorne, Christian |
Publisher | punctum books |
Published on | 2012-09-03 |
Long abstract | ilN’yapasdehors-texte. If post-structuralism has had a motto—a proverb and quotable provocation—then surely it is this, from Derrida’s Of Grammatology.1Text has no outside. There is nothing outside the text. It is tempting to put a conventionally Kantian construction on these words—to see them, I mean, as bumping up against an old epistemo-logical barrier: Our thinking is intrinsically verbal—in that sense, textual—and it is therefore impossible for our minds to get past themselves, to leave themselves behind, to shed words and in that shedding to encounter objects as they really are, in their own skins, even when we’re not thinking them, plastering them with language, generating little mind-texts about them. But this is not, in fact, what the sentence says. Derrida’s claim would seem to be rather stronger than that: not There are unknowable objects outside of text, but There are outside of text no objects for us to know. So we reach for another gloss—There is only text...ain’t nothing but text—except the sentence isn’t really saying that either, since to say that there is nothing outside text points to the possibility that there is, in a manner yet to be explained, something inside text, and this something would not itself have to be text, any more than caramels in a carrying bag have to be made out of cellophane. |
Page range | pp. 273–289 |
Print length | 17 pages |
Language | English (Original) |
Contributors