Skip to main content
Open Book Publishers

Introduction: Articulating the Phenomenological Legacy of the Philosophy of Technology

Chapter of: Phenomenology and the Philosophy of Technology(pp. 1–24)

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.1
  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Metadata
TitleIntroduction
SubtitleArticulating the Phenomenological Legacy of the Philosophy of Technology
ContributorJochem Zwier(author)
Bas de Boer(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0421.00
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0421/chapters/10.11647/obp.0421.00
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
CopyrightJochem Zwier; Bas de Boer;
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2024-10-16
Long abstractIn the introduction, it is motivated why it is important to articulate the phenomenological legacy of the philosophy of technology. We introduce some of the key concerns within philosophy of technology, link those to the general project of phenomenology, and distinguish the phenomenological method from the scientific method. We introduce key figures in the history of phenomenology (e.g., Husserl, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty) and show how their mode of inquiry remains to influence contemporary philosophical reflections on technology. We discuss how phenomenology is typically used in such analyses and identify two different functions of phenomenology in the philosophy of technology: (1) a vehicle to articulate human (embodied) experiences in their interaction(s) with technology, and (2) a way of presenting technology as a general phenomenon that shapes how human beings understand themselves, others, and the world around them. In conclusion, we provide a summary of the chapters and discuss how they relate to the project of the book.
Page rangepp. 1–24
Print length24 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Contributors

Jochem Zwier

(author)
Researcher in philosophy of technology and Managing Director of the 4TU Centre for Ethics of Technology at Wageningen University & Research
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6602-019X
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jochem-Zwier

Jochem Zwier is a researcher in philosophy of technology and Managing Director of the 4TU Centre for Ethics of Technology at Wageningen University. His work is situated at the intersection of philosophy of technology and environmental thought. His research interests include phenomenology, hermeneutics, and philosophical anthropology.

Bas de Boer

(author)
Assistant Professor at University of Twente
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2009-2198
https://people.utwente.nl/s.o.m.deboer

Bas de Boer is an Assistant Professor in the philosophy section at the University of Twente. His research focuses on how technologies shape our understanding and experience of ourselves and the world we live in, with a specific focus on technologies in healthcare. His research interests are in philosophy of science, philosophy of medicine, and (post) phenomenology of technology. He authored How Scientific Instruments Speak: Postphenomenology and Technological Mediations in Neuroscientific Practice (Lexington Books, 2021).

References
  1. Blok, V. (2022). The ontology of technology beyond anthropocentrism and determinism: The role of technologies in the constitution of the (post)Anthropocene world. Foundations of Science, 28, 987–1005, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-022-09829-1
  2. de Boer, B. (2020). Experiencing objectified health: Turning the body into an object of attention. Medicine, Healthcare and Philosophy, 23, 401–411, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-020-0994-0
  3. de Boer, B. (2021). How scientific instruments speak: Postphenomenology and technological mediations in neuroscientific practice. Lexington Books.
  4. de Boer, B., & Verbeek, P.-P. (2022). Living in the flesh: Technologically mediated chiasmic relationships (in times of a pandemic). Human Studies, 45, 189–208, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-022-09625-7
  5. Cera, A. (2017). The technocene or technology as (neo)environment. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 21(2–3), 243–281, https://doi.org/10.5840/techne201710472
  6. Coeckelbergh, M. (2017). Using words and things: Language and the philosophy of technology. Routledge.
  7. Feenberg, A. (2015). Making the gestalt switch. In R. Rosenberger & P.-P. Verbeek (Eds), Postphenomenological investigations: Essays on human-technology relations (pp. 229–236). Lexington Books.
  8. Feenberg, A. (2017). Technosystem: The social life of reason. Harvard University Press.
  9. Gallagher, S. (1986). Body image and body schema: A conceptual clarification. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 7(4), 541–554.
  10. Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and time (J. Stambaugh, Trans.). State University of New York Press.
  11. Husserl, E. (1970). The crisis of the European sciences and transcendental phenomenology (D. Carr, Trans.). Northwestern University Press.
  12. Husserl, E. (1983). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: First book (F. Kerseten, Trans). Martinus Nijhoff.
  13. Husserl, E. (1989). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: Second book (R. Rojcewicz & A. Schuwer, Trans.). Kluwer.
  14. Ihde, D. (1979). Technics and praxis. D. Reidel Publishing Company.
  15. Ihde, D. (1991). Instrumental realism: The interface between philosophy of science and philosophy of technology. Indiana University Press.
  16. Ihde, D. (1993). Postphenomenology: Essays in the postmodern context. Northwestern University Press.
  17. Ihde, D. (2002). Bodies in technology. University of Minnesota Press.
  18. Ihde, D. (2012). Experimental phenomenology: Multistabilities (2nd edition). State University of New York Press, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781438442877
  19. Landes, D. A. (2013). Merleau-Ponty and the paradoxes of expression. Bloomsbury, https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472548061
  20. Latour, B. (2017). Facing Gaia: Eight lectures on the new climatic regime (C. Porter, Trans.). Polity Press.
  21. Lemmens, P., Blok, V., & Zwier, J. (2017). Toward a terrestrial turn in philosophy of technology: Guest editors’ introduction. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 21(2–3), 114–126, https://doi.org/10.5840/techne2017212/363
  22. Merleau-Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of perception (D. A. Landes, Trans.). Routledge.
  23. Rosenberger, R. (2014). Multistability and the agency of mundane artifacts: From speed bumps to subway benches. Human Studies, 37, 369–392, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-014-9317-1
  24. Rosenberger, R., & Verbeek, P.-P. (2015). A field guide to postphenomenology. In R. Rosenberger & P.-P. Verbeek (Eds), Postphenomenological investigations: Essays on human-technology relations (pp. 9–41). Lexington Books.
  25. Verbeek, P.-P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. Pennsylvania University Press.
  26. Verbeek, P.-P. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. University of Chicago Press.
  27. Zwier, J., & Blok, V. (2017). Saving earth: Encountering Heidegger’s philosophy of technology in the Anthropocene. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 21(2–3), 222–242, https://doi.org/10.5840/techne201772167
  28. Zwier, J., & Blok, V. (2019). Seeing through the fumes: Technology and asymmetry in the Anthropocene. Human Studies, 42, 621–646, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-019-09508-4
  29. Zwier, J., Blok, V., & Lemmens, P. (2016). Phenomenology and the empirical turn: A phenomenological analysis of postphenomenology. Philosophy & Technology, 29, 313–333, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0221-7