Skip to main content
Open Book Publishers

2. The Role of Affective Dimensions in the Aesthetic Experience of Music

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Metadata
Title2. The Role of Affective Dimensions in the Aesthetic Experience of Music
ContributorDragan Janković(author)
Maja Mađarev (author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0389.02
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0389/chapters/10.11647/obp.0389.02
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
CopyrightDragan Janković; Maja Mađarev;
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2024-06-20
Long abstractA theoretical model is proposed, and two studies are conducted to test the hypothesis that aesthetic experiences may originate from a few basic mechanisms of affective processing related to emotion dimensions and cognitive evaluation. The results of the first study confirmed that aesthetic experience is strongly related to affective valence (pleasantness) and cognitive evaluation (familiarity) and moderately related to arousal. The results of the second study confirmed that the aesthetic experience of music can be substantially explained by the affective experience of meanings that are activated or constructed in the listener’s mind. The results indicate that people like music that activates pleasant, arousing, and familiar meanings. These results align with our proposal of a Valence, Arousal, and Cognitive evaluation (VACe) model of the aesthetic experience of music.
Page rangepp. 27–46
Print length20 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Contributors

Dragan Janković

(author)
Assistant Professor at University of Belgrade

Dragan Janković is an Assistant Professor at the Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade. He received his PhD in psychology from the University of Belgrade in 2015. He teaches several BA, MA, and PhD courses in developmental psychology, psychology of emotions, and psychology of art. His research focuses mainly on affective processing, multisensory perception, developmental psychology, and empirical aesthetics, with a special interest in visual arts and music. He is a member of he Regional Network Psychology and Music (RNPaM).

Maja Mađarev

(author)
Research Assistant at University of Belgrade

Maja Mađarev graduated from the Department of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade. She is a Research Assistant at the Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, and a Teaching Assistant at Developmental Psychology and Psychology of Art courses. Her main fields of interest are psychological aesthetics and affective processing.

References
  1. Augustin, M.D., Wagemans, J., & Carbon, C-C. (2012). All is beautiful? Generality vs. specificity of word usage in visual aesthetics. Acta Psychologica, 139(1), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.10.004
  2. Barrett, L.F., & Wager, T.D. (2006). The structure of emotion: Evidence from neuroimaging studies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(2), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00411.x
  3. Berlyne, D.E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  4. Bornstein, R.F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265
  5. Brattico, E., & Pearce, M. (2013). The neuroaesthetics of music. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(1), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031624
  6. Cespedes-Guevara, J., & Eerola, T. (2018). Music communicates affects, not basic emotions—A constructionist account of attribution of emotional meanings to music. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 215. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00215
  7. Collier, G.L. (2007). Beyond valence and activity in the emotional connotations of music. Psychology of Music, 35(1), 110–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735607068890
  8. Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6(3–4), 169–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068
  9. Fechner, G.T. (1866). Das Associationsprincip in der Aesthetik [The aesthetic association principle]. Zeitschrift für bildende Kunst, 20, 179–191.
  10. Fontaine, J.R.J., Scherer, K.R., Roesch, E.B., & Ellsworth, P.C. (2007). The world of emotions is not two-dimensional. Psychological Science, 18(12), 1050–1057. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02024.x
  11. Istók, E., Brattico, E., Jacobsen, T., Krohn, K., Müller, M., & Tervaniemi, M. (2009). Aesthetic responses to music: A questionnaire study. Musicae Scientiae, 13(2), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/102986490901300201
  12. Janković, D. (2000a). Konotativni aspekt značenja: Utvrđivanje latentnih dimenzija [Connotative aspect of meaning: Establishing the latent dimensions]. Psihologija, 33(1–2), 199–220. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_334
  13. Janković, D. (2000b). Konotativni aspekt značenja: Konstrukcija konotativnog diferencijala [Connotative aspect of meaning: Construction of the connotative differential]. Psihologija, 33(1–2), 221–238. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_reff_332
  14. Janković, D. (2014). Razvoj estetske preferencije slika [Development of aesthetic preference of visual stimuli] (Publication No. 123456789/4956) [Doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade, Serbia]. National Repository of Dissertations in Serbia. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_nardus_4956
  15. Janković, D. (2015). Cross-modal nature of evaluative meaning. In A. Galmonte & R. Actis-Grosso (eds), Different psychological perspectives on cognitive processes: Current research trends in Alps-Adria region (pp. 58–75). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  16. Janković, D., Mađarev, M., & Živković, I. (2019). Aesthetic preference of photographs: The role of affective experience. In K. Damnjanović, O. Tošković, & S. Marković (eds), Proceedings of the XXV scientific conference Empirical studies in psychology (pp. 92–94). Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade. http://empirijskaistrazivanja.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/proceedings_EIP_2019.pdf
  17. Juslin, P.N., & Sloboda, J.A. (eds). (2010). Handbook of music and emotion: Theory, research, applications. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230143.001.0001
  18. Juslin, P.N., & Västfjäll, D. (2008). Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(5), 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X08005293
  19. Konečni, V.J. (2005). The aesthetic trinity: Awe, being moved, thrills. Bulletin of Psychology and the Arts, 5(2), 27–44. http://konecni.ucsd.edu/pdf/2005%20Aesthetic%20Trinity,%20Bulletin%20of%20P.%20and%20A.pdf
  20. Konečni, V.J. (2008). Does music induce emotion? A theoretical and methodological analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.115
  21. Lang, P.J., Bradley, M.M., & Cuthbert, B.N. (1998). Emotion, motivation, and anxiety: Brain mechanisms and psychophysiology. Biological Psychiatry, 44(12), 1248–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3223(98)00275-3
  22. Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion & adaptation. Oxford University Press.
  23. Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489–508. https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811
  24. Marković, S. (2012). Components of aesthetic experience: Aesthetic fascination, aesthetic appraisal, and aesthetic emotion. i-Perception, 3(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1068/i0450aap
  25. Murphy, S.T. & Zajonc, R.B. (1993). Affect, cognition, and awareness: Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 723–739. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.723
  26. Nordenstreng, K. (1968). A comparison between the semantic differential and similarity analysis in the measurement of musical experience. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 9(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1968.tb00521.x
  27. Ortlieb, S.A., Kügel, W.A., & Carbon, C-C. (2020). Fechner (1866): The aesthetic association principle–A commented translation. i-Perception, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669520920309
  28. Osgood, C.E., Suci, G.J., & Tannenbaum, P.H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. University of Illinois Press.
  29. Parsons, M.J. (1987). How we understand art: A cognitive developmental account of aesthetic experience. Cambridge University Press.
  30. Reber R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
  31. Russell, J.A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714
  32. Russell, J.A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145
  33. Salimpoor, V.N., Benovoy, M., Longo, G., Cooperstock, J.R., & Zatorre, R.J. (2009). The rewarding aspects of music listening are related to degree of emotional arousal. PLoS ONE, 4(10), Article e7487. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0007487
  34. Scherer, K.R. (2001). Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. In K.R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (eds), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, method, research (pp. 92–120). Oxford University Press.
  35. Scherer, K., & Zentner, M. (2008). Music evoked emotions are different–More often aesthetic than utilitarian. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(5), 595–596. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X08005505
  36. Silvia, P.J. (2010). Confusion and interest: The role of knowledge emotions in aesthetic experience. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(2), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017081
  37. Silvia, P.J. (2012). Human emotions and aesthetic experience: An overview of empirical aesthetics. In A.P. Shimamura & S.E. Palmer (eds), Aesthetic science: Connecting minds, brains, and experience (pp. 250–275). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732142.003.0058
  38. Thayer, R.E. (1996). The origin of everyday moods: Managing energy, tension, and stress. Oxford University Press.
  39. Trkulja, M., & Janković, D. (2012). Towards three-dimensional model of affective experience of music. In E. Cambouropoulos, C. Tsougras, P. Mavromatis, & K. Pastiadis (eds), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference ICMPC­ESCOM (pp. 1016–1017). Aristotle University.
  40. Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J., & Tellegen, A. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 820–838. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.820
  41. Wedin, L. (1972). A multidimensional study of perceptual-emotional qualities in music. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 13(1), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1972.tb00072.x
  42. Wundt, W. (1896). Grundriss der Psychologie [Outline of psychology]. Engelmann.
  43. Živanović, M., Vukčević-Marković, M., & Bogunović, B. (2018). Structure of subjective experience of classical music. Psihologija, 51(4), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.2298/PSI170116009Z