Skip to main content
  • Pricing
  • Policies
  • Support us
  • Login
Sign up
  1. Home
  2. Genetic Narratology
  3. 2. Metagenesis: Manuscripts, and How Metanarration and Metafiction Contribute to Their Analysis
Open Book Publishers

2. Metagenesis: Manuscripts, and How Metanarration and Metafiction Contribute to Their Analysis

  • Karin Kukkonen(author)
Chapter of: Genetic Narratology: Analysing Narrative across Versions(pp. 17–34)
  • Export Metadata
  • Metadata
  • Locations
  • Contributors
  • References

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.1
  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
    • EBSCO Host
    • ProQuest Ebrary
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Metadata
Title2. Metagenesis
SubtitleManuscripts, and How Metanarration and Metafiction Contribute to Their Analysis
ContributorKarin Kukkonen(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0426.02
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0426/chapters/10.11647/obp.0426.02
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
CopyrightKarin Kukkonen;
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2024-12-17
Long abstractThis article proposes that moments of metanarration and metafiction can make an important contribution to the project of a genetic, manuscript-oriented narratology. When literary texts reflect on their own madeness, this may be fictional invention, but it also can serve as a means to (re)focus the analysis of the manuscripts underlying the text. Metagenesis, I suggest, can be used to expand the genetic dossier and to bring manuscript genetics into further dialogue with narratology. It offers in particular the opportunity to draw on insights from embodied approaches to the study of narrative and literature, as well as bring manuscript genetics further into conversations around literary creativity. In the first section, then, I will define metagenesis and sketch out its place in an enlarged genetic dossier. In the second section, I propose an example analysis of two passages from Charlotte Brontë’s writings to demonstrate how metagenetics works in practice. The third section, finally, addresses theoretical and methodological challenges that may arise from such a dialogue between manuscript genetics, narratology and literary studies, and propose a number of ways in which they can be met.
Page rangepp. 17–34
Print length18 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Locations
Landing PageFull text URLPlatform
PDFhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0426/chapters/10.11647/obp.0426.02Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0426.02.pdfFull text URL
HTMLhttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0426/chapters/10.11647/obp.0426.02Landing pagehttps://books.openbookpublishers.com/10.11647/obp.0426/ch2.xhtmlFull text URLPublisher Website
Contributors

Karin Kukkonen

(author)
Professor in Comparative Literature at University of Oslo
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5240-3280

Karin Kukkonen is Professor in Comparative Literature at the University of Oslo. She serves as director of LCE—Centre for Literature, Cognition and Emotions and leads the ERC Project JEUX—Literary Games, Poetics and the Early Modern Novel (2024–2028). Kukkonen specialises in the long history of the novel, cognitive poetics, manuscript genetics and narratology. She has published studies on the manuscripts of Frances Burney (in her monograph How the Novel Found its Feet, 2019) and on the manuscripts for the Three Musketeers (in Orbis Litterarum, 2019). In her most recent work, Creativity and Contingency in Literary Writing (forthcoming), Kukkonen develops a model for creativity in literature on the basis of literary theory, author interviews and manuscript analysis.

References
  1. Add. MS. 43481, Fair copy manuscript of ‘Villette’ Vol. 2, 1852, London: British Library.
  2. BPM Bon98(8), ‘Roe Head Journal’. 14 October 1836, Haworth, Keighley: Brontë Parsonage Museum.
  3. Bernini, Marco (2014), ‘Supersizing Narrative Theory: On Intention, Material Agency, and Extended Mind-Workers’, Style, 48.3: 349–66, https://doi.org/10.5325/style.48.3.349.
  4. Add. MS. 43482, Fair copy manuscript of ‘Villette’ Vol. 3, 1852, London: British Library.
  5. Bernini, Marco (2022), Beckett and the Cognitive Method: Minds, Models and Explorative Narratives (New York: Oxford University Press).
  6. Biasi, Pierre-Marc De (1996), ‘What Is a Literary Draft? Toward a Functional Typology of Genetic Criticism’, Yale French Studies, 89: 26–58, https://doi.org/10.2307/2930337.
  7. Brontë, Charlotte [1830] (1987), ‘Strange Events by Lord Charles Wellesley’, in: An Edition of the Early Writings of Charlotte Brontë, ed. by Christine Alexander, vol. 1, The Glass Town Saga, 1826–1832 (Oxford: Blackwell).
  8. Brontë, Charlotte (1997), The Belgian Essays, ed. and trans. by Sue Lonoff (New Haven and London: Yale University Press).
  9. Brontë, Charlotte [1853] (2000), Villette, ed. by Margaret Smith and Herbert Rosengarten (New York: Oxford University Press).
  10. Brontë, Charlotte [1849] (2007), Shirley, ed. by Herbert Rosengarten and Margaret Smith (New York: Oxford University Press).
  11. Bryant, John (2002), The Fluid Text: A Theory of Revision and Editing for Book and Screen (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press).
  12. Campe, Rüdiger (2021), ‘Writing; The Scene of Writing’, MLN, 136.5: 971–83, https://doi.org/10.1353/mln.2021.0075.
  13. Clark, Andy (1998), ‘Magic Words: How Language Augments Human Computation’, in: Language and Thought: Interdisciplinary Themes, ed. by Jill Boucher and Peter Carruthers, 162–83 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511597909.011.
  14. Debray Genette, Raymonde (1979), ‘Génétique et Poétique: Le Cas Flaubert’, in: Essais de Critique Génétique (Paris: Flamarion).
  15. Debray Genette, Raymonde (1988), Métamorphoses Du Récit. Autour de Flaubert (Paris: Seuil).
  16. Ferrer, Daniel (2016), ‘Genetic Criticism with Textual Criticism: From Variant to Variation’, Variants : The Journal of the European Society for Textual Scholarship, 12–13: 57–64.
  17. Fforde, Jasper (2001), The Eyre Affair (London: Hodder & Stoughton).
  18. Gao, Timothy (2021), Virtual Play and the Victorian Novel: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Fictional Experience, vol. 127, Cambridge Studies in Nineteenth-Century Literature and Culture (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
  19. Gaskell, Elizabeth [1857] (1997), The Life of Charlotte Brontë, ed. by Elisabeth Jay (London: Penguin).
  20. Gilbert, Sandra M. (1979), The Madwoman in the Attic: The Woman Writer and the Nineteenth-Century Literary Imagination (New Haven: Yale University Press).
  21. Hanks, Lucy (2020), ‘Different Kinds of Silence: Revisions of Villette and the “Reader’s Romance”’, Journal of Victorian Culture , 25.3: 443–57, https://doi.org/10.1093/jvcult/vcaa010.
  22. Heritage, Barbara (2014), ‘Bronte and the Bookmakers: Jane Eyre in the Nineteenth-Century Marketplace’, Doctoral Dissertation (Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia). https://www.academia.edu/81020086/Bronte_and_the_Bookmakers_Jane_Eyre_in_the_Nineteenth_Century_Marketplace.
  23. Heritage, Barbara (2021), ‘Reading the Writing Desk: Charlotte Brontë’s Instruments and Authorial Craft’, Studies in Romanticism, 60.4: 503–22, https://doi.org/10.1353/srm.2021.0030.
  24. Kukkonen, Karin (forthcoming), Creativity and Contingency in Literary Writing (Bloomsbury).
  25. Marin, Ileana (2014), ‘Charlotte Brontë’s Busy Scissors Revising Villette’, Brontë Studies : Journal of the Brontë Society, 39.1: 42–53, https://doi.org/10.1179/1474893213Z.00000000094.
  26. Miller, Lucasta [2001] (2020), The Brontë Myth (London: Vintage).
  27. Murray, Janet H. (1997), Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace (New York: Free Press).
  28. Ratchford, Fannie Elizabeth (1949), The Brontes’ Web of Childhood (New York: Columbia University Press).
  29. Springer, Olga (2020), Ambiguity in Charlotte Brontë’s Villette, (Göttingen: V&R unipress).
  30. Van Hulle, Dirk (2017), ‘Cognition Enactment’, Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd’hui, 29.1: 185–98, https://doi.org/10.1163/18757405-02901016.
  31. Van Hulle, Dirk (2022), Genetic Criticism: Tracing Creativity in Literature (Oxford: Oxford University Press). https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192846792.001.0001.

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.1
  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
    • EBSCO Host
    • ProQuest Ebrary
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters

UK registered social enterprise and Community Interest Company (CIC).

Company registration 14549556

Metadata

  • By book
  • By publisher
  • GraphQL API
  • Export API

Thoth

  • About Us
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Service status

Contact

  • Email
  • Twitter
  • Mastodon
  • Github

Copyright © 2025 Thoth Open Metadata. Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.