Skip to main content
Open Book Publishers

12. You Don’t Get Scared of Monsters, You Get Scared for People: Creating Suspense across Versions in Stephen King’s IT

Chapter of: Genetic Narratology: Analysing Narrative across Versions(pp. 199–220)

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.1
  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
  • ONIX 2.1
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
  • BibTeX
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Metadata
Title12. You Don’t Get Scared of Monsters, You Get Scared for People
SubtitleCreating Suspense across Versions in Stephen King’s IT
ContributorVincent Neyt(author)
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0426.12
Landing pagehttps://www.openbookpublishers.com/books/10.11647/obp.0426/chapters/10.11647/obp.0426.12
Licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
CopyrightVincent Neyt;
PublisherOpen Book Publishers
Published on2024-12-17
Long abstractThis essay explores suspense in the context of the writing process of a classic suspense novel, Stephen King’s IT (1986). The methodology combines genetic criticism with a narratological analysis that focusses on pace, characterization, and focalization. King wrote three drafts of the novel between 1980 and 1985. The genetic dossier shows that only minimal alterations were required to the story events or their sequencing, but that King increased the length of the suspenseful scenes in the first half of the novel. Patterns in the revisions of these scenes reveal the importance the author identified in establishing a strong connection between the reader and the character in danger: the pace is lowered by giving more attention to the sensory experiences, the character traits, the direct speech and the thoughts and emotions of the focalizing characters. In King’s view, it is the readers’ connection with the protagonist in body and mind that grabs them and keeps them engaged.
Page rangepp. 199–220
Print length22 pages
LanguageEnglish (Original)
Contributors

Vincent Neyt

(author)
Researcher at University of Antwerp
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3825-8579

Vincent Neyt has a background in genetic criticism and digital scholarly editing. He is the technical developer of the Beckett Digital Manuscript Project (www.beckettarchive.org). In 2024 he completed the PhD Turning the Thumbscrews Tighter: Suspense Across Versions in Stephen King’s IT, as part of a research project at the University of Antwerp funded by the Research Foundation of Flanders.

References
  1. Bal, Mieke (2009), Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative, 3rd edition (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).
  2. Bálint, Katalin E. (2020), ‘Suspense’, in: The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology, ed. by Jan Van den Bulck (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0178.
  3. Beecher, Donald (2007), ‘Suspense’, Philosophy and Literature, 31.2: 255–79.
  4. Brewer, W.F. (1996), ‘The Nature of Narrative Suspense and the Problem of Rereading’, in: Suspense: Conceptualizations, Theoretical Analyses, and Empirical Explorations, ed. by Peter Vorderer et al. (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum), 107–27.
  5. Brewer, W.F., and E.H. Lichtenstein (1982), ‘Stories Are to Entertain: A Structural-Affect Theory of Stories’, Journal of Pragmatics, 6.5–6: 473–86.
  6. Carroll, Noël (1990), The Philosophy of Horror or Paradoxes of the Heart (New York: Routledge).
  7. de Toro, Alfonso (2011), ‘Time Structure in the Contemporary Novel’, in: Time: From Concept to Narrative Construct: A Reader, ed. by Jan Christoph Meister and Wilhelm Schernus (Berlin: De Gruyter), 109–42.
  8. Fludernik, Monika (1996), Towards a ‘Natural’ Narratology (London and New York: Routledge).
  9. Genette, Gérard (1980), Narrative Discourse, trans. by Jane E. Lewin (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).
  10. Gerrig, Richard, and David W. Allbritton (1990), ‘The Construction of Literary Character: A View from Cognitive Psychology’, Style, 24.3: 380–91.
  11. Gerrig, Richard J. (1996), ‘The Resiliency of Suspense’, in: Suspense: Conceptualizations, Theoretical Analyses, and Empirical Explorations, ed. by Peter Vorderer et al. (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum), 93–106.
  12. Gingrich, Brian (2018), The Pace of Modern Fiction: A History of Narrative Movement in Modernity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press). http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp012f75rb738.
  13. Hakemulder, Frank, Moniek M. Kuijpers, Ed S. Tan, Katalin Bálint, and Minura M. Doicaru (2017), Narrative Absorption (Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing).
  14. Hamon, Philippe (1977), ‘Pour un Statut Sémiologique du Personage’, in: Poétique du Récit, ed. by Roland Barthes et al. (Paris: Seuil), 115–80.
  15. Herman, Luc, and Bart Vervaeck (2019), Handbook of Narrative Analysis, 2nd edition (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press).
  16. Jahn, Manfred (1996), ‘Windows of Focalization: Deconstructing and Reconstructing a Narratological Concept’, Style, 30.2: 241–67.
  17. Jannidis, Fotis (2013), ‘Character’, in: The Living Handbook of Narratology, ed. by Peter Hühn et al. (Hamburg: Hamburg University). https://www-archiv.fdm.uni-hamburg.de/lhn/node/41.html.
  18. King, Stephen (1981), IT (first draft photocopy), Stephen King’s personal archive in Bangor, box 70, folders 4–5.
  19. King, Stephen (1986), IT (New York: Viking).
  20. King, Stephen (2012), On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft (London: Hodder).
  21. Kukkonen, Karin (2020), ‘The Speed of Plot. Narrative Acceleration and Deceleration’, Orbis Litterarum, 75: 73–85, https://doi.org/10.1111/oli.12251.
  22. Niederhoff, Burkhard (2011), ‘Focalization’, in: The Living Handbook of Narratology, ed. by Peter Hühn et al. (Hamburg: Hamburg University). https://www-archiv.fdm.uni-hamburg.de/lhn/node/18.html.
  23. Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith (2002), Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics, 2nd edition (London: Routledge).
  24. Schmid, Wolf (2010), Narratology: An Introduction (Berlin and New York: De Gruyter).
  25. Schneider, Ralf (2001), ‘Toward a Cognitive Theory of Literary Character: The Dynamics of Mental Model Construction’, Style, 35.4: 607–40.
  26. Schneider, Ralf (2013), ‘The Cognitive Theory of Character Reception: An Updated Proposal’, Anglistik: International Journal of English Studies, 24.2: 117–34.
  27. Smuts, Aaron (2008), ‘The Desire-Frustration Theory of Suspense’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 66.3: 281–90.
  28. Sternberg, Meir (1978), Expositional Modes and Temporal Ordering (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).
  29. Sternberg, Meir (2003a), ‘Universals of Narrative and Their Cognitivist Fortunes (I)’, Poetics Today, 24.3: 297–395.
  30. Sternberg, Meir (2003b), ‘Universals of Narrative and Their Cognitivist Fortunes (II)’, Poetics Today, 24.4: 517–638.
  31. Ueda, Akemi (2016), ‘Stanford Literary Lab uses Digital Humanities to Study Why We Feel Suspense’, https://news.stanford.edu/2016/02/18/literary-lab-suspense-021816/.
  32. Underwood, Tim, and Chuck Miller, ed. (1989), Bare Bones: Conversations on Terror with Stephen King (New York: Warner Books).
  33. Vorderer, Peter, Hans J. Wulff, and Mike Friedrichsen, ed. (1996), Suspense: Conceptualizations, Theoretical Analyses, and Empirical Explorations (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum).
  34. Zillman, Dolf (1980), ‘Anatomy of Suspense’, in: The Entertainment Functions of Television, ed. by P. H. Tannenbaum (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 133–63.