punctum books
Thelyology: Apuleius’s Morphologies of Damage
- David Youd (author)
Chapter of: The Before and the After: Critical Asynchrony Now(pp. 91–112)
Export Metadata
- ONIX 3.1Cannot generate record: No publications supplied
- ONIX 3.0
- ThothCannot generate record: No publications supplied
- Project MUSECannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
- OAPENCannot generate record: Missing PDF URL
- JSTORCannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
- Google BooksCannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
- OverDriveCannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
- Thoth
- ONIX 2.1
- EBSCO HostCannot generate record: No PDF or EPUB URL
- ProQuest EbraryCannot generate record: No PDF or EPUB URL
- EBSCO Host
- CSV
- JSON
- OCLC KBART
- BibTeX
- CrossRef DOI depositCannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
- MARC 21 RecordCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
- MARC 21 MarkupCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
- MARC 21 XMLCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Title | Thelyology |
---|---|
Subtitle | Apuleius’s Morphologies of Damage |
Contributor | David Youd (author) |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.53288/0446.1.06 |
Landing page | https://punctumbooks.com/titles/the-before-and-the-after-critical-asynchrony-now/ |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
Copyright | David Youd |
Publisher | punctum books |
Published on | 2025-01-29 |
Long abstract | Proposing a new interpretative approach to Apuleius’s Metamorphoses, I attempt to shift the locus of deconstructive reading from the novel’s larger narratological structures to its smaller morphologies of bodies, words, and syntax. First, I retrace Derrida’s account in Archive Fever of the integral role of technical form to ontological possibility. As he reminds us, the signifier (the means of recording) reveals by repressing, producing lack even as it engenders the illusion of unitary wholeness. Against this semblance of completion, Derrida conjures the specter of radical alterity and irrecoverable loss that bedevil any archival endeavor. Archive Fever interfaces here with theorizations of late style: the tendency of the artist to turn away from resolution and closure as life’s close reveals its basic fragmentation rather than any essential unity. In both intellectual projects, the supplement meant to redeem the whole is twisted into a revelation of irreparable damage, and this logic of the perverted supplement can be said to condition Apuleius’s novelistic technique. Turning to Thelyphron’s autobiographical tale at the end of book two, I advance a mode of very close reading or “interpretive microscopy” focused on the intricacies of aesthetic form and style. At every turn, as my readings seek to show, Thelyphron transforms his narrative prostheses from archontic technologies of the self into the means of its undoing. |
Page range | pp. 91–112 |
Print length | 22 pages |
Language | English (Original) |
Keywords |
|
Contributors
David Youd
(author)PhD candidate in classics and critical theory at University of California, Berkeley
David Youd is a PhD candidate in classics and critical theory at University of California, Berkeley. His published work includes articles and essays on Euripides, Plautus, and Terence. His dissertation, “The Queer Art of Terence,” offers a rereading of Terence’s comedies through the lens of psychoanalysis and queer theory.