UJ Press
7. Catholic schools for the deaf and apartheid (1948-1968)
- Mark James (author)
Chapter of: Proud to be Deaf: Saintliness in the Catholic Deaf community in South Africa from 1874-1994
Export Metadata
- ONIX 3.1Cannot generate record: No publications supplied
- ONIX 3.0
- ThothCannot generate record: No publications supplied
- Project MUSECannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
- OAPENCannot generate record: Missing License
- JSTORCannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
- Google BooksCannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
- OverDriveCannot generate record: Missing Language Code(s)
- Thoth
- ONIX 2.1
- EBSCO HostCannot generate record: No PDF or EPUB URL
- ProQuest EbraryCannot generate record: No PDF or EPUB URL
- EBSCO Host
- CSV
- JSON
- OCLC KBARTCannot generate record: Missing License
- BibTeXCannot generate record: Missing Author/Editor Details
- CrossRef DOI depositCannot generate record: No work or chapter DOIs to deposit
- MARC 21 RecordCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
- MARC 21 MarkupCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
- MARC 21 XMLCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Title | 7. Catholic schools for the deaf and apartheid (1948-1968) |
---|---|
Landing page | https://ujonlinepress.uj.ac.za/index.php/ujp/catalog/book/200 |
Publisher | UJ Press |
Published on | 2025-05-29 |
Long abstract | Catholic education for the deaf existed within the context of racial segregation first and then under apartheid after 1948. Catholic schools for the deaf were not exempt and this chapter recounts how schools for the deaf were necessarily racially segregated most radically after 1948. The Church hardly resisted these policies as it was dependent on government funding to cover the expense of paying teachers and covering the expenses for the technology required for maintaining the oral method of deaf education. In African schools for the deaf sign language was permitted because schools were more poorly funded and did not have the resources to pay for expensive technology. This is evaluated through the critical lens of Levinas’ understanding of the use of money in society. |