Skip to main content
UJ Press

7. Catholic schools for the deaf and apartheid (1948-1968)

  • Mark James (author)

Export Metadata

  • ONIX 3.1
    Cannot generate record: No publications supplied
  • ONIX 3.0
    • Thoth
      Cannot generate record: No publications supplied
    • Project MUSE
      Cannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
    • OAPEN
      Cannot generate record: Missing License
    • JSTOR
      Cannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
    • Google Books
      Cannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
    • OverDrive
      Cannot generate record: Missing Language Code(s)
  • ONIX 2.1
    • EBSCO Host
      Cannot generate record: No PDF or EPUB URL
    • ProQuest Ebrary
      Cannot generate record: No PDF or EPUB URL
  • CSV
  • JSON
  • OCLC KBART
    Cannot generate record: Missing License
  • BibTeX
    Cannot generate record: Missing Author/Editor Details
  • CrossRef DOI deposit
    Cannot generate record: No work or chapter DOIs to deposit
  • MARC 21 Record
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 Markup
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
  • MARC 21 XML
    Cannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Metadata
Title7. Catholic schools for the deaf and apartheid (1948-1968)
Landing pagehttps://ujonlinepress.uj.ac.za/index.php/ujp/catalog/book/200
PublisherUJ Press
Published on2025-05-29
Long abstractCatholic education for the deaf existed within the context of racial segregation first and then under apartheid after 1948. Catholic schools for the deaf were not exempt and this chapter recounts how schools for the deaf were necessarily racially segregated most radically after 1948. The Church hardly resisted these policies as it was dependent on government funding to cover the expense of paying teachers and covering the expenses for the technology required for maintaining the oral method of deaf education. In African schools for the deaf sign language was permitted because schools were more poorly funded and did not have the resources to pay for expensive technology. This is evaluated through the critical lens of Levinas’ understanding of the use of money in society.