Scottish Universities Press
Conviviality and standards: open access publishing after AI
- Will Luers (author)
Export Metadata
- ONIX 3.1Cannot generate record: No publications supplied
- ONIX 3.0
- ThothCannot generate record: No publications supplied
- Project MUSECannot generate record: No BIC or BISAC subject code
- OAPENCannot generate record: Missing PDF URL
- JSTORCannot generate record: No BISAC subject code
- Google BooksCannot generate record: No BIC, BISAC or LCC subject code
- OverDriveCannot generate record: No priced EPUB or PDF URL
- Thoth
- ONIX 2.1
- EBSCO HostCannot generate record: No PDF or EPUB URL
- ProQuest EbraryCannot generate record: No PDF or EPUB URL
- EBSCO Host
- CSV
- JSON
- OCLC KBART
- BibTeX
- CrossRef DOI depositCannot generate record: This work does not have any ISBNs
- MARC 21 RecordCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
- MARC 21 MarkupCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
- MARC 21 XMLCannot generate record: MARC records are not available for chapters
Title | Conviviality and standards |
---|---|
Subtitle | open access publishing after AI |
Contributor | Will Luers (author) |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.62637/sup.GHST9020.13 |
Landing page | https://books.sup.ac.uk/sup/catalog/book/sup-9781917341073/chapter/14 |
License | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
Copyright | Will Luers |
Publisher | Scottish Universities Press |
Published on | 2025-04-29 |
Long abstract | As new areas of academic research proliferate (and cross-pollinate), scholarly digital publishing makes it possible to grow online networks around research interests without relying on the slow, gate-keeping procedures of traditional print publishing. In this way, advances in digital technology continue to offer scholars a wider readership and more meaningful peer networks, but these benefits come at a cost. Without a reliable economic model, the labor of peer-reviewing, editing, formatting, distributing and marketing scholarly writing and research is, in many cases, taken on by the scholars themselves. Digital tools make publishing workflows considerably more efficient and faster, but the unpaid labor involved is still a hindrance to any sustainable models for publishing scholarly work. Automation is often framed as a tool to increase productivity and efficiency by diminishing the role of fallible humans in a technical process. In the case of digital editing, the automation of grammar and spell check is labor saved for a deeper and more attentive reading of a text, where more subtle errors might lie in the author’s very argument. AI publishing technologies promise to improve not only editing texts, but detecting plagiarism, checking sources, seeking out peer reviewers, converting files, formatting for multiple platforms, marketing on social media and analyzing metrics. What remains of scholarly digital publishing as an activity when AI and Machine Learning tools absorb the considerable technical labor involved? Scholars (as researchers, writers, editors, and publishers) might be freed to concentrate on ideas themselves. By removing technical barriers and potential friction in publishing workflows, AI and ML might make way for a greater flow among scholars in the evaluation and dissemination of research and theories. AI might make scholarly digital publishing more convivial. Ivan Illich, in his <em>Tools for Conviviality</em>, considers a convivial society as one in which individuals have the means, tools, incentives and desire for collaboration. Conviviality escapes a rigid hierarchical and standardized process and seeks out diverse and innovative voices because it is sustained by individuals who choose to be a part of something that is at once self-serving and for the greater good. Scholarly digital publishing, especially open-access publishing, is already modelling this kind of shared labour in the service of both the individual scholars seeking to publish their work and the fields of research made up of a community of peers. While there are concerns with any new AI technology, especially the human biases embedded in algorithms, AI tools targeted for repetitive publishing tasks can open an opportunity to shape a renaissance in convivial scholarly publishing that sacrifices neither academic standards nor individual innovation and creativity. |
Language | English (Original) |
Contributors
Will Luers
(author)Will Luers is a digital artist, writer and educator. His artwork and collaborations have garnered international recognition and been featured in festivals and conferences such as the Electronic Literature Organization, FILE (Brazil) and ISEA. Novelling, a generative work made in collaboration with poet Hazel Smith and sound artist Roger Dean, won the 2018 Robert Coover Award for Electronic Literature. Luers teaches web development, digital cinema and multimodal publishing in the Creative Media & Digital Culture program at Washington State University, Vancouver. He is the founder of the international online journal, The Digital Review, and is also the current Managing Editor at the electronic book review.